Feature | August 18, 2014| Yvonne Li

How You Should – and Should Not – Be Sharing Medical Information With Patients

A Review of HIPAA security practices to keep in mind when sharing patient data

HIPAA, HIPPA, cyber security, securing health records, securing patient records

The healthcare industry is becoming more mobile and efficient than ever before thanks to the adoption of technologies such as electronic health records (EHR) and electronic sharing, storing and accessing of medical data. These advances have all helped to give patients a more dynamic and comprehensive healthcare experience. They have also helped empower patients to take control of their own healthcare history and information.   

While this is a positive step for healthcare, the rapidly changing landscape makes privacy and security threats a greater issue. As the risk of data breaches increase, complying with guidelines, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule and Security Rule, becomes more complicated. Penalties can range from $100 to $50,000 per violation, so healthcare providers should take every precaution to ensure the privacy and safety of shared information. 

Outdated Channels Heighten Privacy Risks 
As more options for storing and sharing patient information emerge, others become outdated and more prone to risk, and should no longer be used by healthcare providers or patients. Although they might be convenient, channels to avoid include e-mail, CDs and other well-known online file sharing services that send information in a non-encrypted format. 
E-mail, is a ubiquitous method of communication across all industries, both for professional and personal use. E-mail makes it easy for a doctor or patient to send and share medical histories or test results. Unfortunately, too many security breaches have shown that this is not a secure means of data exchange. It cannot be guaranteed that the data is encrypted both “in flight” and “at rest.” Furthermore, the e-mail provider varies from person to person, making it difficult to keep track of the security measures in place. 
Another common method of exchanging medical data is on CDs, which is not only unsafe, but inefficient as well. They take time to create and mail, translating into potential delays in diagnosis and overall care delivery. Postage costs and the cost of the CD itself are also a consideration. More importantly, the mail is not a secure or reliable means of transferring information, as it can be intercepted. Having private medical data fall into the wrong hands puts medical professionals and patients at serious risk. Losing or misplacing the CD is also an issue.  
A more recent method — online and cloud-based data storage websites — is proliferating, offering heightened levels of security and privacy control. While these new channels can significantly reduce risk, it is important to understand the differences among them. For example, physicians should be particularly careful using services that are not HIPPA compliant or certified. Under HIPAA rules, it is the responsibility of the healthcare provider to ensure the safety of patient information and data breaches. These incidences can result in fines totaling thousands of dollars. 
Educating Patients and Providing Safe Means for Data Exchange 
While the patient can choose to use whichever medium they want without having to worry about incurring regulatory issues, providers have an opportunity — and increasingly an obligation — to educate patients on the risks associated with non-secure methods and leaks of their private information. For instance, medical identity theft is on the rise. In a 2008 report, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimated this affected 250,000 victims, based on Federal Trade Commission survey data from 2006.[1] More recently, the Ponemon Institute calculated that there were 1.84 million victims of medical identity theft in 2013. This constitutes a 21 percent increase over the previous year.[1] Additionally, leaked medical records could lead to prejudice during the employment process as well as with personal insurance rates. Even personal storage on computers and hard drives should be done with caution as these are frequently subjected to various viruses designed to obtain personal information as well as theft and/or loss.
Not only can providers educate, they also can offer patients a secure service as an added value to their experience. Secure cloud-storage and exchange services that provide a fast and convenient link between patients and doctors do exist. Using HIPAA complaint providers is the safest and most easily accessible way to exchange patient information. There are a number of services available, both free and for a cost, depending on the level of functionality and storage needed in the practice.   
When choosing a cloud storage or data exchange provider, it is imperative to research what each service does and does not offer when it comes to security, and data breach compensation. Knowing the location of your service partner’s data center and their security procedures ensures that your data is fully protected and compliant even when faced with a natural disaster or a security breach. Ask questions regarding backup and disaster recovery procedures to know the consequences in case your data is ever lost. Check for downtime procedures and level of customer support guaranteed by the service provider. In addition, the provider should be willing to sign a business associate agreement (BAA), which reduces some provider liability for breaches on the server side. From the data exchange perspective, it is also important for providers to be able to track send and retrieve activities between patients and other doctors. 
As the demand for quick and direct communications between doctors, or doctors and patients grows, it is important to remember that not all methods of file sharing are created equal. E-mail, CDs and non-secure online and cloud-based data storage websites should be avoided when transferring private and critical medical data, due to potential compromised privacy risks and additional incurred costs. 
To ensure protection of patient privacy, research your data exchange provider to ensure their security protocols fall in line with HIPAA guidelines and reflect the needs of your patients and your practice. It is equally important to educate patients on how to utilize the same services when exchanging information to ensure compliancy on both ends. 
Editor’s note: Yvonne Li is vice president of business development for the SurMD, SurDoc Corp. The company specializes in healthcare cloud security, offering a line of HIPAA compliant products using proprietary security algorithms. For more information, visit www.surmd.com.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Medical Identity Theft Environmental 
Scan” (October 2008)
2. State of California Department of Justice, “Medical Identity Theft Recommendations for the Age of Electronic Medical Records” https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/privacy/medical_id_theft_r...

Related Content

PICOM, Scimage, Cardiac PACS, CVIS

ScImage's PICOM system is an example of a CVIS that unifies the IT needs of several cardiovascular service lines into a single cardiology department reporting and image management system. This includes cardiac imaging, echo, ECG management and cath lab reporting. 

Feature | Cardiac PACS| October 08, 2015 | Dave Fornell
Cardiovascular information systems (CVIS or cardiac PACS) have undergone a transformation over the past few years to
CMS, Stage 3 Meaningful Use final rule, ONC, healthcare IT, electronic health records, EHR
Feature | Information Technology| October 07, 2015
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final version of Stage 3 Meaningful Use (MU)...
News | Business| October 06, 2015
GE Healthcare announced the creation of a new business unit, Sustainable Healthcare Solutions (SHS), that will develop...
News | Enterprise Imaging| October 01, 2015
October 1, 2015 — Infinitt North America will feature the Infinitt Healthcare Platform (IHP) at RSNA 2015.
ONC, Federal Health IT Strategic Plan 2015-2020, information technology, healthcare
Feature | Information Technology| September 22, 2015
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology...
Frost & Sullivan, top medical technologies, growth, healthcare

Corindus CorPath Vascular Robotic System image courtesy of Corindus Vascular Robotics.

Feature | Information Technology| September 22, 2015
Frost & Sullivan released its list of top medical technologies for 2015, featuring an array of sophisticated...

Big data from regional health exchanges can help identify patients who are at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease and stroke based on blood pressure readings and trends from their office visits over time that arestored in the electronic health records. This information can be used to target these patients with more followups, education and more intensive prevention programs. 

Feature | Information Technology| September 22, 2015 | Jeff Zagoudis and Dave Fornell
As healthcare converts to an entirely electronic health record (EHR)-based system, it opens up new opportunities to m
ICER, CardioMEMS, Entresto, congestive heart failure, cost-effectiveness

CardioMEMS image courtesy of St. Jude Medical.

News | Heart Failure| September 16, 2015
The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) has released a new report offering a comprehensive review of...
Mortara, ELI 280, TouchScreen ECG, ECG advances, new ECG technology

The Mortara Eli 280 is part of a new generation of ECG systems that integrate touchscreen monitors to improve workflow.

Feature | ECG| September 16, 2015 | Dave Fornell
The resting electrocardiogram (ECG) has been used as a basic cardiac diagnostic for a century, and while the premise
Michigan, See You in 7, heart failure, readmissions, ACC
News | Patient Engagement| September 15, 2015
Michigan hospitals participating in the American College of Cardiology’s “See You in 7” program demonstrated important...
Overlay Init