Feature | March 20, 2009| Dave Fornell

If Radial Access Helps Increase Patient Safety, Why Aren’t More Doctors Using It?

During TCT 2009 this past fall in Washington D.C. I had the chance to listen to Shigeru Saito, M.D., FACC, ShonanKamakura General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, explain reasons why he feels transradial artery access for interventional procedures is better than the U.S. standard of femoral access. Dr. Shigeru is among the biggest advocates in the world for transradial access, and is a self-described transradial intervention (TRI) evangelist. Living up to that title, he travels the globe each year to spread the word about the benefits of TRI and train physicians. Last year alone he visited 35 countries.

The first TRI was attempted in 1992. Dr. Shigeru said he started using the procedure in 2004 and since has become its biggest proponent. He advocates radial access as a way to help cut door-to-balloon times, because he says once doctors get familiar with TRI they can perform procedures faster than femoral access. He also said from his experience there is a high instance of complications using femoral access — primarily bleeding and incision site infection.

These same safety issues were highlighted in a recent meta-analysis of data on patients who underwent interventional procedures using either the femoral or radial access techniques. The study was published online in November in the American Heart Journal. The study found radial access significantly decreases risk of major bleeding compared to femoral access. Data also showed a trend toward fewer deaths and ischemic events using radial access.

Sanjit S. Jolly, M.D., of McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada and fellow researchers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL from 1980 to April 2008 and conference abstracts from 2005 to April 2008 to identify randomized trials comparing radial vs. femoral access and examined cases for major bleeding, death, myocardial infarction and procedural times. They found 21 randomized trials with more than 5,400 patients. Their analysis showed radial access offered a significant reduction in major bleeding events and led to better outcomes compared to femoral access. Radial access also led to shorter hospital stays, the researchers found.

While these numbers seem promising, TRI accounts for a small number of the overall procedures conducted worldwide. In the U.S. the technique is rarely used and there is a lot of debate among American doctors about it. Dr. Shigeru classified the debate whether to use TRI as a fight between young and old interventionalists.

One of the arguments against using the access method has been hand ischemia induced by the procedure. There is also a steep learning curve to master the radial access technique, which is not taught at most U.S. medical schools.

Another reason why TRI has not been well received in the U.S. may be based on patient preferences. They generally don’t want scars on their wrists, which are much more visible than the groin. Second, it was pointed out in the TCT session patients need to be more heavily sedated because they tend to fight clinicians who are attempting to puncture their wrists.

We would be interested in hearing back from cardiologists who have attempted radial access and discontinued its use, and from those who adopted it as their preferred access method. My e-mail is [email protected].

Related Content

SCAI 2016, PCI, bleeding risk, bivalirudin, NCDR risk calculator, clinical trial
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| May 06, 2016
The largest risk-directed study by a national hospital system demonstrates a 40 percent decline in bleeding events for...
News | Cardio-oncology| May 06, 2016
The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) has released an expert consensus statement...
CSI, Cardiovascular Systems Inc, Diamondback 360 Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System, OAS, ORBIT II study, three-year results, SCAI 2016
News | Atherectomy Devices| May 06, 2016
May 6, 2016 — Cardiovascular Systems Inc.
TOBA-BTK study, twelve-month results, SCAI 2016, Tack Endovascular System, critical limb ischemia
News | Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)| May 05, 2016
Intact Vascular Inc. announced that positive twelve-month results from its Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty – Below-...
SCAI, cath lab, best practices, guidelines, 2016
News | Cath Lab| May 05, 2016
May 5, 2016 — The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) published an update to its 2012 pap
FDA, CDRH, national evaluation system, medical device development
Feature | Business| May 04, 2016
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it is building the foundations of a national evaluation system to...
radiation dose in the cath lab
News | Radiation Dose Management| May 02, 2016
May 2, 2016 — Starting at the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) 2016 annual meeting May
Feature | Business| April 28, 2016 | Dave Fornell
 
Technology | Stents Peripheral| April 27, 2016
Veniti Inc. announced the first successful treatment with the Vici Verto Venous Stent System of a patient suffering...
Auris Surgical Robotics, acquisition, Hansen Medical
News | Robotic Systems| April 26, 2016
Auris Surgical Robotics Inc. and Hansen Medical Inc. announced that they have signed a definitive merger agreement...
Overlay Init