Feature | March 20, 2009| Dave Fornell

If Radial Access Helps Increase Patient Safety, Why Aren’t More Doctors Using It?

During TCT 2009 this past fall in Washington D.C. I had the chance to listen to Shigeru Saito, M.D., FACC, ShonanKamakura General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, explain reasons why he feels transradial artery access for interventional procedures is better than the U.S. standard of femoral access. Dr. Shigeru is among the biggest advocates in the world for transradial access, and is a self-described transradial intervention (TRI) evangelist. Living up to that title, he travels the globe each year to spread the word about the benefits of TRI and train physicians. Last year alone he visited 35 countries.

The first TRI was attempted in 1992. Dr. Shigeru said he started using the procedure in 2004 and since has become its biggest proponent. He advocates radial access as a way to help cut door-to-balloon times, because he says once doctors get familiar with TRI they can perform procedures faster than femoral access. He also said from his experience there is a high instance of complications using femoral access — primarily bleeding and incision site infection.

These same safety issues were highlighted in a recent meta-analysis of data on patients who underwent interventional procedures using either the femoral or radial access techniques. The study was published online in November in the American Heart Journal. The study found radial access significantly decreases risk of major bleeding compared to femoral access. Data also showed a trend toward fewer deaths and ischemic events using radial access.

Sanjit S. Jolly, M.D., of McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada and fellow researchers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL from 1980 to April 2008 and conference abstracts from 2005 to April 2008 to identify randomized trials comparing radial vs. femoral access and examined cases for major bleeding, death, myocardial infarction and procedural times. They found 21 randomized trials with more than 5,400 patients. Their analysis showed radial access offered a significant reduction in major bleeding events and led to better outcomes compared to femoral access. Radial access also led to shorter hospital stays, the researchers found.

While these numbers seem promising, TRI accounts for a small number of the overall procedures conducted worldwide. In the U.S. the technique is rarely used and there is a lot of debate among American doctors about it. Dr. Shigeru classified the debate whether to use TRI as a fight between young and old interventionalists.

One of the arguments against using the access method has been hand ischemia induced by the procedure. There is also a steep learning curve to master the radial access technique, which is not taught at most U.S. medical schools.

Another reason why TRI has not been well received in the U.S. may be based on patient preferences. They generally don’t want scars on their wrists, which are much more visible than the groin. Second, it was pointed out in the TCT session patients need to be more heavily sedated because they tend to fight clinicians who are attempting to puncture their wrists.

We would be interested in hearing back from cardiologists who have attempted radial access and discontinued its use, and from those who adopted it as their preferred access method. My e-mail is [email protected].

Related Content

coherex Wave Crest LAA Occluder

Coherex WaveCrest Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Occlusion System.

News | November 24, 2015
November 24, 2015 — Biosense Webster announced it has acquired Coherex Medical Inc., a privately held medical device
Feature | Cath Lab| November 24, 2015
November 24, 2015 — The U.S.
Boston Scientific, Watchman FLX, LAA closure device, CE mark, first European implants

Image courtesy of Boston Scientific

News | Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Occluders| November 20, 2015
Boston Scientific announced the first implants of the Watchman FLX left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) device
ThinkRadial, Merit Medical Systems, Vascular Training Model

2015 Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) attendees demo the ThinkRadial Vascular Training Model. Image courtesy of Merit Medical Systems Inc.

News | Radial Access| November 17, 2015
Merit Medical Systems Inc. and its ThinkRadial education program now offers a new vascular training model at events...
News | Cath Lab| November 10, 2015
TherOx Inc. announced it has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)...
Sponsored Content | Videos | TCT| November 05, 2015
DAIC Editor Dave Fornell offers his choices for the most innovative new interventional cardiovascular technologies pr
Sponsored Content | Videos | TCT| November 05, 2015
Tom Watson, clinical analyst for MDBuyLine, and DAIC Dave Fornell discuss some of the technology trends at the 2015 T
CSI, OPTIMIZE study, peripheral orbital atherectomy system, peripheral artery disease, PAD

Diamondback 360 orbital atherectomy system. Image courtesy of Cardiovascular Systems Inc.

News | Atherectomy Devices| November 03, 2015
Cardiovascular Systems Inc. (CSI) announced last week that the first two patients have been enrolled in its OPTIMIZE,...
Overlay Init