Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor

Dave Fornell, Editor DAIC

Blog | Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor | July 09, 2014

Drawing the Line When Evaluating Cost vs. Benefit

A big fly in the ointment for widespread adoption of many new technologies is cost. In today’s cost-conscience environment of healthcare reform, there needs to be a clear, quantifiable return of investment (ROI). This is especially true for new medical technologies that are competing with a long-established standard of care, where the new technology must show either a cost-benefit over the older technology, or must show a big improvement in patient outcomes to justify the added expense. With a device that shows only an incremental increase in benefit, say a 1-2 percent or less improvement over existing technology, the question may become one of economics rather than device effectiveness.

This is not only a question for physicians, as it applies to vendors developing these products as well. One of the biggest examples of this is the case of drug-eluting stents. During the last decade, key stent vendors were in an arms race to build a better device and capture a large share of the then lucrative coronary stent market. This included extremely expensive, blockbuster clinical trials, massive R&D efforts, and lawsuits and countersuits to try to slow down the competition. However, this came to a halt with the SPIRIT IV trial results in 2010, which proved the Abbott Xience stent was the best in the market for patient outcomes and beat out the long-time market leader, the Boston Scientific Taxus stent.  

However, the victory only just edged out Taxus. Stent thrombosis improvements were measured in fractions of less than 1 percent, and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization improvements were less than a 2.6 percentage-point absolute reduction. The data proving that Abbott was the top performer by only a small margin came at a staggering cost of nearly a billion dollars and several years of data collection. Few vendors are willing to shell out that sort of cash today to conduct similar sized trials that will be powered with enough patients to show only small incremental improvements.  

In reality, all the drug-eluting stents on the U.S. market today are good devices and all have similar patient outcomes. This has led to stents becoming commodity items, where lower pricing can often trump slightly better trial data. This is why the Xience stent does not master the entire stent market and why competitors remain in the game. 

I shared some additional thoughts on things to consider when looking at new devices and software in the article The Basics for Evaluating New Technology in the July-August issue of DAIC.

Related Content

FFR-CT, HeartFlow, PLATFORM trial, ESC 2015, ICA, fractional flow reserve, computed tomography

Image courtesy of HeartFlow Inc.

Feature | FFR Catheters| September 03, 2015
Results of the PLATFORM trial indicate fractional flow reserve computed tomography (FFR-CT) can obviate the need for...
News | Structural Heart| September 02, 2015
An investigational material known as Bioabsorbable Cardiac Matrix (BCM), designed to prevent cardiac remodeling in...
acute ischemic stroke, larger thrombi retrieval, improved neurological recovery, ESC 2015, MR CLEAN trial, sub-study
Feature | Thrombectomy Devices| September 02, 2015
Retrieval of larger thrombi during intra-arterial treatment (IAT) is associated with improved neurological recovery...
chest pain, triage, emergency department, new rapid assay, Dirk Westermann, BACC study, ESC 2015
News | Blood Testing| September 02, 2015
Emergency department patients with chest pain suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be triaged more...
Pie Medical Imaging, Frost & Sullivan, technology leadership, CAAS, cardiovascular diagnostics

CAAS MRV is part of Pie Medical Imaging's suite of imaging solutions for quantitative cardiovascular diagnosis and treatment planning. - See more at: http://www.itnonline.com/content/pie-medical-imaging-recognized-innovati...

News | Cardiac Imaging| September 01, 2015
Based on its recent analysis of the cardiovascular image management market, Frost & Sullivan recognizes Pie Medical...
Absorb, BVS, bioresorbable stent
News | Stents Bioresorbable| September 01, 2015
September 1, 2015 — A bioresorbable drug-eluting coronary stent showed similar efficacy and safety results compared t
bivalirudin,angiomax
Feature | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| September 01, 2015
September 1, 2015 — Extending treatment with the anticoagulant bivalirudin for at least four hours after completion o
Mitralign, Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty System

Mitralign's Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty System uses catheter delivered pledgeted sutures that can be cinched together to change the valve annulus geometry to help eliminate valvular regurgitation. 

News | Heart Valve Repair| August 31, 2015
August 31, 2015 — Mitralign Inc. said the U.S.
biomimics, 3D stent
News | Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)| August 28, 2015
August 28, 2015 — PinnacleHealth CardioVascular Institute enrolled the first patient in Pennsylvania and second in th
iFR, FFR, Philips, Volcano
News | Cath Lab| August 28, 2015
August 28, 2015 — Philips Healthcare is showcasing its latest cardiology solutions at the European Society of Cardiol
Overlay Init