Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor

Dave Fornell, Editor DAIC

Blog | Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor | March 16, 2012

How Much CT Dose Did I Receive…Anyone?

By Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor

With increasing concern about radiation dose levels in radiology, I wanted to share my personal opinion on the subject based on my observations in the industry and first-hand experience as a patient.

I recently had two computed tomography (CT) scans performed and having covered the subject of CT dose numerous times, I was curious to see what levels of ionizing radiation I received. I asked for copies of my datasets and the radiology reports and was surprised that the settings to record dose were not turned on. The scanner failed to record the dose length product (DLP) or the CT dose index (CTDI) volume on the DICOM header, which can be used to estimate the millisievert (mSv) dose of the exam.

I don’t believe there is currently any legal requirement to record this information in Illinois, where I had my scan, or anywhere else for that matter. California will become the first state to require the recording of dose this summer, when a new state law goes into effect July 1. There is expectation in the industry this will be the first of many requirements to better monitor medical imaging radiation dose.

My scans were performed to evaluate lower abdominal pain, which turned out to be a urinary tract infection with an odd presentation, being centered in the left ductus deferens. To rule out something more serious in the emergency department (ED), I had a contrast/delayed scan, followed by a non-contrast exam the following day. The contrast scans on a brand-new 64-slice scanner had no dose record. A non-contrast scan I had the following day on another machine at the same hospital did capture my DLP, which I calculated into an estimated dose of 9.5 mSv. The images from my contrast scan were better quality, mainly due to the contrast injection. But I wonder whether the better image quality may also have been due to the technologist turning up the dial to produce better quality pictures. I will never know.

Exposure to radiation is something the public takes quite seriously. But most people have no idea how the radiology world works and are unaware of the actual exposure levels for exams they receive. Even if the dose were recorded, most patients probably would have no idea where to look for that information or how to calculate dose from the cryptic numbers and acronyms on their scans. (This would also be contingent upon the patient being provided a CD containing a DICOM viewer, which does not always work on a patient’s personal computer.)

While it is understandable that the public does not know how to convert these numbers into the estimated dose received, I wonder whether many in the industry are in the same boat. While editing a recent comparison chart for Imaging Technology News (ITN), I was shocked to find none of the major CT manufacturers in the United States answered the following question: “What is the conversion factor used and cited for conversion from DLP to mSv.” This factor is important because it enables a person to look at a CT scan and immediately figure the estimated dose the patient received. I don't know why no one provided this information, because to me it seems important for potential customers to know. It makes me wonder whether this information is being communicated effectively in the field. If operators understand why DLP and the conversion factor are important, they might be more inclined to make sure that the DLP capture is on when CT scans are done.

My life-time cumulative dose is low, so I look at my scans mainly from an academic standpoint. However, my concern would be much higher if I had a chronic condition or combination of ailments requiring numerous or repeated CT scans.

With the major trend in radiology today being to make scans as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA), I believe more care should be taken to document dose. There is a good chance this will be required in the future. The American College of Radiology (ACR) started its Dose Index Registry (DIR) more than a year ago and now has more than 1 million scans. Data collected from the DIR will be used to establish national benchmarks for CT dose indices to help ensure that patients receive safe, quality imaging.  However, in order to know where a facility stands in meeting or falling short of these benchmarks, they must first record the doses they are using.

 

Related Content

Medic Vision, SafeCT-29, NEMA XR-29, Smart Dose, computed tomography
Technology | Computed Tomography (CT)| May 31, 2016
Medic Vision Imaging Solutions Ltd. announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance of SafeCT-29 to...
Toshiba, Infinix 4-D CT, first U.S. install, Arkansas cancer center
News | CT Angiography (CTA)| May 26, 2016
Cancer patients at the Carti Cancer Center, Conway, Ark., now have access to the latest innovation in diagnostic...
cath lab, radiation exposure, glocoma
Feature | Radiation Dose Management| May 26, 2016 | Dave Fornell
May 27, 2016 — Radiation exposure to cath lab staff and physicians has seen growing concern in recent years, as the p
HeartFlow, FFR-CT, ruptured coronary plaques, EMERALD study, EuroPCR 2016
News | CT Angiography (CTA)| May 23, 2016
First-in-human data presented at EuroPCR 2016 demonstrate that hemodynamic data from HeartFlow Inc. may help predict...
Technology | Cardiac Imaging| May 18, 2016
May 18, 2016 — The Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) recently announced its launch of the IAC QI Self-Asse
Sponsored Content | Videos | HIMSS| May 13, 2016
ITN/DAIC Editor Dave Fornell takes a tour of some of the most innovative new trends and health information t
Radiation dose management, radiation dose monitoring, X-ray dose

Analytics from Sectra’s radiation dose monitoring software showing procedures where dose levels were higher than normal for various X-ray modalities. 

Feature | Radiation Dose Management| May 12, 2016 | Lori Webb, R.T. (R) and Tom Watson, RCVT
Healthcare organizations, clinicians and medical equipment manufacturers have long focused on the management and redu
Hitachi Medical, Scenaria CT scanner, All-Inclusive Support program
Technology | Computed Tomography (CT)| May 02, 2016
May 2, 2016 — Hitachi Medical Systems America Inc.
radiation dose in the cath lab
News | Radiation Dose Management| May 02, 2016
May 2, 2016 — Starting at the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) 2016 annual meeting May
coronary CT angiography, CCTA, SCOT-HEART trial substudy, SCCT
News | Computed Tomography (CT)| April 26, 2016
The results of a secondary analysis of the SCOT-HEART trial show that coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)...
Overlay Init