Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor

Dave Fornell, Editor DAIC

Blog | Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor | July 23, 2013

Not Everyone is on the Same Page to Lower Radiation Dose

By Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor

Finding ways to lower patient radiation dose from both medical imaging and interventional cardiology has become a major trend. However, when vendors start talking dose, it is important to realize there are no set industry standards agreed upon by manufacturers to calculate dose. For this reason, I call into question vendors’ statistics of how much their technology can lower dose by up to 20, 50 or even 80 percent.  While new technologies such as iterative reconstruction, more sensitive detectors and ECG gating do indeed lower dose, quantifying it can be a moving target. 

DAIC created a comparison chart for technologies to help lower computed tomography (CT) dose (see Page 34).  Vendors were asked, “How does your system calculate estimated dose?” As an example, we asked what they use as a conversion factor to calculate dose in MilliSieverts (mSv) based on dose-length product (DLP) or CT dose index volume (CTDlvol) found on a scan’s DICOM header.  To our surprise, this central question of how vendors arrive at their dose statistics was not answered by anyone. I wrote back posing this question again and only received responses from GE and Philips — the rest declined to comment.  The bottom line is that there are no industry standards agreed upon by manufacturers. 

“There have been publications to estimate effective dose from DLP or CTDI through conversion factors and there are organ dose simulations you can calculate using Monte Carlo techniques, however each method has its own level of uncertainty,” said Leslie Lakis, Philips senior public relations manager, imaging systems. “Therefore, physicists are left to use whatever effective dose conversion they prefer until the scientific community formally adopts a standard method for effective dose conversion.”

Ken Denison, global marketing director, CT, global MICT dose leader, GE Healthcare, said each manufacturer takes measurements on 16 and 32 cm water phantoms for a range of parameters (kVp, mA, slice thickness, pitch, etc.) and this allows them to then estimate the exposure using CTDIvol. However, he said GE does not provide an estimate for whole-body effective dose on its systems. “This is because there are different k-factors that may be used to convert DLP to and estimate of whole-body effective dose. Different users may choose which factors to use differently,” he said. 

Due to the variability cited, I often wonder if true apples-to-apples comparisons between vendors’ technologies are possible. Also, as more states consider laws requiring providers to record patient dose, what measure is being used?  It must be realized that all dose calculations are based on 16 and 32 cm phantoms, which are are not real people and most patients are 16 or 32 cm across. In addition, each patient body habitus impacts the individual level of dose, so all dose measures are really a best guess, not an exact science.

Related Content

medical imaging, low-dose radiation, cancer, LNT model study
News | Radiation Dose Management| February 04, 2016
The widespread belief that radiation from X rays, CT scans and other medical imaging can cause cancer is based on an...
UltraSPECT, 450th U.S. installation, Firelands Regional Medical Center, nuclear medicine, radiation safety
News | Nuclear Imaging| January 27, 2016
UltraSPECT Inc. has marked the 450th U.S. installation of its low-dose image processing technology for nuclear medicine...
Image Wisely, annual pledge process, medical imaging, radiation safety
News | Radiation Dose Management| January 27, 2016
Image Wisely participants must now make yearly commitments, as opposed to a one-time pledge, confirming their ongoing...
Medic Vision, SafeCT Enterprise, St. Joseph's/Candler Health System, Georgia
News | Computed Tomography (CT)| January 26, 2016
Medic Vision Imaging Solutions Ltd. announced the installation of SafeCT (computed tomography) at St. Joseph’s/Candler...
ECRI Institute, Rate This Model, medical equipment, review/rating tool
News | Business| January 25, 2016
Now, medical technology purchasers and users have an instant online forum to rate and review technologies they are...
ACC, ACR, chest pain, diagnostic imaging, emergency department, recommendations document
News | Cardiac Imaging| January 25, 2016
New recommendations from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American College of Radiology (ACR) have...
ISO 15382:2015, measuring radiation exposure, dosimeter
News | Radiation Dose Management| January 13, 2016
Ionizing radiation can save lives, but it can also cause serious harm. Getting the right measurement of exposure to...
News | Cardiac Imaging| December 28, 2015 | Dave Fornell
December 28, 2015 — Toshiba announced Dec.
Siemens, Teamplay, Protocols, radiation dose monitoring, RSNA 2015
Technology | Analytics Software| December 22, 2015
At the 101st Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Siemens...
Siemens, TwinBeam Dual Energy CT, Somatom Definition, RSNA 2015
Technology | Advanced Visualization| December 21, 2015
Siemens Healthcare’s approach to delivering dose-neutral dual energy images obtained on Somatom computed tomography (CT...
Overlay Init