Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor

Dave Fornell, Editor DAIC

Blog | Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor | July 23, 2013

Not Everyone is on the Same Page to Lower Radiation Dose

By Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor

Finding ways to lower patient radiation dose from both medical imaging and interventional cardiology has become a major trend. However, when vendors start talking dose, it is important to realize there are no set industry standards agreed upon by manufacturers to calculate dose. For this reason, I call into question vendors’ statistics of how much their technology can lower dose by up to 20, 50 or even 80 percent.  While new technologies such as iterative reconstruction, more sensitive detectors and ECG gating do indeed lower dose, quantifying it can be a moving target. 

DAIC created a comparison chart for technologies to help lower computed tomography (CT) dose (see Page 34).  Vendors were asked, “How does your system calculate estimated dose?” As an example, we asked what they use as a conversion factor to calculate dose in MilliSieverts (mSv) based on dose-length product (DLP) or CT dose index volume (CTDlvol) found on a scan’s DICOM header.  To our surprise, this central question of how vendors arrive at their dose statistics was not answered by anyone. I wrote back posing this question again and only received responses from GE and Philips — the rest declined to comment.  The bottom line is that there are no industry standards agreed upon by manufacturers. 

“There have been publications to estimate effective dose from DLP or CTDI through conversion factors and there are organ dose simulations you can calculate using Monte Carlo techniques, however each method has its own level of uncertainty,” said Leslie Lakis, Philips senior public relations manager, imaging systems. “Therefore, physicists are left to use whatever effective dose conversion they prefer until the scientific community formally adopts a standard method for effective dose conversion.”

Ken Denison, global marketing director, CT, global MICT dose leader, GE Healthcare, said each manufacturer takes measurements on 16 and 32 cm water phantoms for a range of parameters (kVp, mA, slice thickness, pitch, etc.) and this allows them to then estimate the exposure using CTDIvol. However, he said GE does not provide an estimate for whole-body effective dose on its systems. “This is because there are different k-factors that may be used to convert DLP to and estimate of whole-body effective dose. Different users may choose which factors to use differently,” he said. 

Due to the variability cited, I often wonder if true apples-to-apples comparisons between vendors’ technologies are possible. Also, as more states consider laws requiring providers to record patient dose, what measure is being used?  It must be realized that all dose calculations are based on 16 and 32 cm phantoms, which are are not real people and most patients are 16 or 32 cm across. In addition, each patient body habitus impacts the individual level of dose, so all dose measures are really a best guess, not an exact science.

Related Content

Medic Vision, SafeCT-29, XR-29 compliance, CT systems, RSNA 2015

Image courtesy of Siemens

Technology | Computed Tomography (CT)| November 24, 2015
Medic Vision Imaging Solutions Ltd. announced the introduction of SafeCT-29. Designed to be computed tomography (CT)-...
CIRS, Dynamic Cardiac Phantom, CT, RSNA 2015

Image courtesy of CIRS Inc.

Technology | Quality Assurance (QA)| November 24, 2015
The Dynamic Cardiac Phantom is a precision instrument which mimics the translation and rotational motion of the heart...
3-D modeling, reconstructed hearts, child heart transplants, AHA Scientific Sessions 2015
News | Advanced Visualization| November 23, 2015
A new 3-D computer modeling system may significantly improve a surgeon’s ability to select the best-sized donor heart...
GE Healthcare, molecular imaging, PET/CT, Discovery IQ, Discovery NM/CT 670 Pro, RSNA 2015

Discovery IQ PET/CT scanner image courtesy of GE Healthcare

News | Nuclear Imaging| November 16, 2015
GE Healthcare’s Molecular Imaging business will showcase the Discovery IQ positron emission tomography/computed...

Cardiologists using the Philips spectral CT software to view a spectral CT image reconstruction at various energy levels.

Feature | CT Angiography (CTA)| November 12, 2015 | Dave Fornell
Computed tomography has seen rapid growth in all segments of medicine over the past two decades, and recent advances
Sponsored Content | Videos | TCT| November 05, 2015
DAIC Editor Dave Fornell offers his choices for the most innovative new interventional cardiovascular technologies pr
Sponsored Content | Videos | Cath Lab| November 03, 2015
Guillaume Baillaird, CEO of ControlRad Systems, described how his company's technology can significantly reduce radia
Access Scientific, Powerwand midline IV catheter, CT contrast injection

Image courtesy of Access Scientific LLC

Technology | Contrast Media| November 02, 2015
Access Scientific LLC announced validation of the Powerwand midline IV catheter for power-injectable capability up to...
FFR-CT, cost and quality of life outcomes, TCT 2015, PLATFORM trial

Image courtesy of HeartFlow Inc.

Feature | CT Angiography (CTA)| October 18, 2015
New results from a multicenter, prospective study show that assessing fractional flow reserve estimated with computed...
Oregon Health & Science University, OSHU, Toshiba Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition, CT, computed tomography

Image courtesy of Toshiba America Medical Systems

News | CT Angiography (CTA)| October 08, 2015
Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) now offers patients one of the most advanced computed tomography (CT)...
Overlay Init