Feature | Cybersecurity | August 18, 2014| Yvonne Li

How You Should – and Should Not – Be Sharing Medical Information With Patients

A Review of HIPAA security practices to keep in mind when sharing patient data

HIPAA, HIPPA, cyber security concerns are rising over how to better securing patient records.

The healthcare industry is becoming more mobile and efficient than ever before thanks to the adoption of technologies such as electronic health records (EHR) and electronic sharing, storing and accessing of medical data. These advances have all helped to give patients a more dynamic and comprehensive healthcare experience. They have also helped empower patients to take control of their own healthcare history and information.

While this is a positive step for healthcare, the rapidly changing landscape makes privacy and security threats a greater issue. As the risk of cybersecurity data breaches increase, complying with guidelines, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule and Security Rule, becomes more complicated. Penalties can range from $100 to $50,000 per violation, so healthcare providers should take every precaution to ensure the privacy and safety of shared information.

 

Outdated Channels Heighten Privacy Risks 
As more options for storing and sharing patient information emerge, others become outdated and more prone to risk, and should no longer be used by healthcare providers or patients. Although they might be convenient, channels to avoid include e-mail, CDs and other well-known online file sharing services that send information in a non-encrypted format.
 
E-mail, is a ubiquitous method of communication across all industries, both for professional and personal use. E-mail makes it easy for a doctor or patient to send and share medical histories or test results. Unfortunately, too many security breaches have shown that this is not a secure means of data exchange. It cannot be guaranteed that the data is encrypted both “in flight” and “at rest.” Furthermore, the e-mail provider varies from person to person, making it difficult to keep track of the security measures in place.
 
Another common method of exchanging medical data is on CDs, which is not only unsafe, but inefficient as well. They take time to create and mail, translating into potential delays in diagnosis and overall care delivery. Postage costs and the cost of the CD itself are also a consideration. More importantly, the mail is not a secure or reliable means of transferring information, as it can be intercepted. Having private medical data fall into the wrong hands puts medical professionals and patients at serious risk. Losing or misplacing the CD is also an issue.
 
A more recent method — online and cloud-based data storage websites — is proliferating, offering heightened levels of security and privacy control. While these new channels can significantly reduce risk, it is important to understand the differences among them. For example, physicians should be particularly careful using services that are not HIPPA compliant or certified. Under HIPAA rules, it is the responsibility of the healthcare provider to ensure the safety of patient information and data breaches. These incidences can result in fines totaling thousands of dollars.
 
 
Educating Patients and Providing Safe Means for Data Exchange 
While the patient can choose to use whichever medium they want without having to worry about incurring regulatory issues, providers have an opportunity — and increasingly an obligation — to educate patients on the risks associated with non-secure methods and leaks of their private information. For instance, medical identity theft is on the rise. In a 2008 report, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimated this affected 250,000 victims, based on Federal Trade Commission survey data from 2006.[1] More recently, the Ponemon Institute calculated that there were 1.84 million victims of medical identity theft in 2013. This constitutes a 21 percent increase over the previous year.[1] Additionally, leaked medical records could lead to prejudice during the employment process as well as with personal insurance rates. Even personal storage on computers and hard drives should be done with caution as these are frequently subjected to various viruses designed to obtain personal information as well as theft and/or loss.
 
Not only can providers educate, they also can offer patients a secure service as an added value to their experience. Secure cloud-storage and exchange services that provide a fast and convenient link between patients and doctors do exist. Using HIPAA complaint providers is the safest and most easily accessible way to exchange patient information. There are a number of services available, both free and for a cost, depending on the level of functionality and storage needed in the practice.
 
When choosing a cloud storage or data exchange provider, it is imperative to research what each service does and does not offer when it comes to security, and data breach compensation. Knowing the location of your service partner’s data center and their security procedures ensures that your data is fully protected and compliant even when faced with a natural disaster or a security breach. Ask questions regarding backup and disaster recovery procedures to know the consequences in case your data is ever lost. Check for downtime procedures and level of customer support guaranteed by the service provider. In addition, the provider should be willing to sign a business associate agreement (BAA), which reduces some provider liability for breaches on the server side. From the data exchange perspective, it is also important for providers to be able to track send and retrieve activities between patients and other doctors.
 
As the demand for quick and direct communications between doctors, or doctors and patients grows, it is important to remember that not all methods of file sharing are created equal. E-mail, CDs and non-secure online and cloud-based data storage websites should be avoided when transferring private and critical medical data, due to potential compromised privacy risks and additional incurred costs. 
 
To ensure protection of patient privacy, research your data exchange provider to ensure their security protocols fall in line with HIPAA guidelines and reflect the needs of your patients and your practice. It is equally important to educate patients on how to utilize the same services when exchanging information to ensure compliancy on both ends. 
 
Editor’s note: Yvonne Li is vice president of business development for the SurMD, SurDoc Corp. The company specializes in healthcare cloud security, offering a line of HIPAA compliant products using proprietary security algorithms. For more information, visit www.surmd.com.
 
 
References: 
 
 
 
 

Related Content

ACC Combines NCDR, Accreditation Into New Quality Summit
News | Cardiovascular Business | March 15, 2019
The American College of Cardiology’s first annual ACC Quality Summit, held March 13-15 in New Orleans, merges the NCDR...
Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology Named 2019 Azbee Awards Finalist for Social Media
News | Cardiovascular Business | March 08, 2019 | Jeff Zagoudis, Associate Editor
Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology (DAIC) was named a finalist in the Social Media Presence category for the 2019...
 FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb Announces Resignation
News | Cardiovascular Business | March 05, 2019 | Jeff Zagoudis, Associate Editor
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., resigned from his position March 5 after two...
Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology Honored as Jesse H. Neal Awards Finalist

An example of the new transesophageal echo (TEE) visualization technology called TrueVue was shown at TCT 2018 for the first time. Philips’ new photo-realistic rendering is designed to offer a surgical view of cardiac structures to aid transcatheter procedural navigation.

News | Cardiovascular Business | February 25, 2019
Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology has been recognized as a finalist in the Jesse H. Neal Awards for the third...
GE to Postpone Healthcare IPO Following Biopharmaceutical Business Sale
News | Cardiovascular Business | February 25, 2019 | Jeff Zagoudis, Associate Editor
GE Healthcare announced Feb. 25 the sale of its biopharmaceutical business to Danaher, and GE Chairman and CEO Larry...
Medical Bills Financially Burden Almost Half of Cardiovascular Disease Patients
News | Cardiovascular Business | February 11, 2019
Over 45 percent of adult atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients suffer financial hardship related to...
Researchers raised the question whether an economic benefit should be assessed in FDA reviews. A large amount of the bill for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation procedures is the cost of the mapping and ablation catheters.

A large amount of the bill for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation procedures is the cost of the mapping and ablation catheters. Researchers raised the question whether an economic benefit should be assessed in FDA reviews. 

Feature | Cardiovascular Business | January 14, 2019 | Philip Jacobs, DPhil, Ilke Akpinar, M.D., Thanh Nguyen, M.D., Ph.D., Rupinder Sandhu, M.D., and Lars Thording Ph.D.
In an age when everything in medicine is now looked at though a cost vs. benefit analysis and U.S.
GE Submits Initial Public Offering Paperwork for Healthcare Division
News | Cardiovascular Business | December 19, 2018
As part of its plans to spin off its healthcare division into a separate company, GE reportedly submitted the paperwork...
Affordable Care Act Ruled Unconstitutional in Texas Federal Court
News | Cardiovascular Business | December 17, 2018
A judge of the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled the Affordable Care Act (ACA)...
Average Age of U.S. Cardiologists Up While Income is Down
News | Cardiovascular Business | October 25, 2018
Overall cardiology compensation has dropped for the first time since 2014, according to the sixth annual Cardiovascular...
Overlay Init