Feature | March 20, 2009| Dave Fornell

If Radial Access Helps Increase Patient Safety, Why Aren’t More Doctors Using It?

During TCT 2009 this past fall in Washington D.C. I had the chance to listen to Shigeru Saito, M.D., FACC, ShonanKamakura General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan, explain reasons why he feels transradial artery access for interventional procedures is better than the U.S. standard of femoral access. Dr. Shigeru is among the biggest advocates in the world for transradial access, and is a self-described transradial intervention (TRI) evangelist. Living up to that title, he travels the globe each year to spread the word about the benefits of TRI and train physicians. Last year alone he visited 35 countries.

The first TRI was attempted in 1992. Dr. Shigeru said he started using the procedure in 2004 and since has become its biggest proponent. He advocates radial access as a way to help cut door-to-balloon times, because he says once doctors get familiar with TRI they can perform procedures faster than femoral access. He also said from his experience there is a high instance of complications using femoral access — primarily bleeding and incision site infection.

These same safety issues were highlighted in a recent meta-analysis of data on patients who underwent interventional procedures using either the femoral or radial access techniques. The study was published online in November in the American Heart Journal. The study found radial access significantly decreases risk of major bleeding compared to femoral access. Data also showed a trend toward fewer deaths and ischemic events using radial access.

Sanjit S. Jolly, M.D., of McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada and fellow researchers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL from 1980 to April 2008 and conference abstracts from 2005 to April 2008 to identify randomized trials comparing radial vs. femoral access and examined cases for major bleeding, death, myocardial infarction and procedural times. They found 21 randomized trials with more than 5,400 patients. Their analysis showed radial access offered a significant reduction in major bleeding events and led to better outcomes compared to femoral access. Radial access also led to shorter hospital stays, the researchers found.

While these numbers seem promising, TRI accounts for a small number of the overall procedures conducted worldwide. In the U.S. the technique is rarely used and there is a lot of debate among American doctors about it. Dr. Shigeru classified the debate whether to use TRI as a fight between young and old interventionalists.

One of the arguments against using the access method has been hand ischemia induced by the procedure. There is also a steep learning curve to master the radial access technique, which is not taught at most U.S. medical schools.

Another reason why TRI has not been well received in the U.S. may be based on patient preferences. They generally don’t want scars on their wrists, which are much more visible than the groin. Second, it was pointed out in the TCT session patients need to be more heavily sedated because they tend to fight clinicians who are attempting to puncture their wrists.

We would be interested in hearing back from cardiologists who have attempted radial access and discontinued its use, and from those who adopted it as their preferred access method. My e-mail is [email protected]

Related Content

Abbott recalls its NC Balloon catheters
News | Balloon Catheter| May 22, 2017
May 22, 2017 — Abbott Vascular has initiated a voluntary recall of specific lots of three catheters due to 19 reports
Contego Medical Receives CE Mark for Vanguard IEP Peripheral Balloon Angioplasty System
News | Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)| May 17, 2017
Contego Medical LLC announced recently that it has received CE Marking of its Vanguard IEP Peripheral Balloon...
Early Treatment for NSTEMI Patients Shows Greater Rate of Survival
News | Cath Lab| May 16, 2017
An analysis of non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients who undergo coronary revascularization within...
Large Multicenter Study Shows High Success Rate for Robotic PCI Procedures, SCAI, Corindus CorPath 200
News | Robotic Systems| May 16, 2017
The largest real-world study of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) demonstrated clinical and technical...
Adept Medical Launches IR Platform, interventional radiology
Technology | Cath Lab| May 16, 2017
Adept Medical announced the launch of the IR Platform, designed as an over-patient work surface for vascular and...
Race, Gender and Socioeconomic Factors Impact PCI Outcomes, PLATINUM Diversity study, SCAI 2017
News | Cath Lab| May 15, 2017
A first-of-its-kind study discovered that women and minorities who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI...
Analysis Looks at Role Type of Valve Plays in Patient Outcomes Post-TAVR
News | Heart Valve Technology| May 15, 2017
For patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), their risk factors, not the type of valve used...
Day of the Week PCI-Related Hospitalization Occurs Determines Likelihood of Survival, SCAI 2017
News | Cath Lab| May 15, 2017
In a large-scale analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related hospitalizations, people admitted to the...
First Pennsylvania Patient Treated in LEADERS FREE II Trial of BioFreedom Drug-Coated Stent
News | Stents Drug Eluting| May 12, 2017
PinnacleHealth CardioVascular Institute enrolled the first patient in Pennsylvania in a trial assessing the safety and...
Overlay Init