Feature | November 26, 2013| Simon Häger

Leverage ACR’s Dose Index Registry by Utilizing a Dose Monitoring Solution

The radical increase in patient exposure to radiation from medical imaging over the last two decades has created great concerns about its inherent risks. Today, one of the highest priorities on many hospital agendas is to break this trend by achieving improved control of the radiation exposure to their patients. 
 
The collection and monitoring of patient radiation dose is currently limited or non-existent in many imaging facilities which has provoked reaction by government agencies and state legislatures to establish laws and programs to collect and report on dose. There is no doubt that this has led the medical imaging community to take action to comply with these initiatives and gain a better control of the radiation exposure to their patients. 
 
ACR’s Dose Index Registry
ACR’s Dose Index Registry (DIR), a prominent data registry in the United States, allows facilities to compare their computed tomography (CT) dose indices to regional and national values. Information related to dose indices for all CT exams is collected, anonymized, transmitted, and stored in this data repository. Every six months, institutions receive feedback reports comparing their results (by body part and exam type) against aggregate values in an attempt to provide hospitals a way of benchmarking dose values.[1]  Unfortunately, the external comparison itself is not enough; appropriate action must be taken from within the facility to reduce and achieve better control of radiation exposure to make sure laws and the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) dose principals are followed. 
 
Utilizing a Dose Monitoring Solution
When an outlier in dose values for a specific procedure is identified in a feedback report, the next step is to determine the underlying reason for the deviation. The focus must move from external comparison to internal investigation. 
 
“Utilizing a dose monitoring solution is the most efficient way to collect and visualize the huge volume of data concerned with dose reporting,” said Ian Judd, product manager for Sectra DoseTrack. “Any solution should accept data from multiple sources such as EMR, RIS, modalities and PACS and provide analytical tools to allow for drill-down into details about the specific procedure and the underlying cause for exceptions.”
 
He said it is only by gathering data from multiple sources within the imaging arena that an effective dose reduction methodology can be implemented. When this is accomplished, appropriate dose reducing actions including adjusting protocols, configuring modalities and providing additional training to staff will be successful.
 
“A dose monitoring solution should allow for comparisons on multiple levels such as between X-ray equipment, staff, and departments to determine the reason why each exposure occurred,” Judd said. “Without the ability to look at the complete patient journey from initial referral to the finalized report, the customer will never truly be able to manage patient dose. The actual dose received is a single moment in time, however, there are many other key touch points in the care of the patient, which if not also analyzed, will never allow true dose reduction to be achieved. 
 
He said a dose tracking system provides confirmation and confidence in operating a quality, professional service. This confidence and proof can then be used to improve confidence in the level of service to referring clinicians and patients.
 
Both the Joint Commission (JCAHO) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have provided recommendations on capturing and transmitting dose information in the patient’s electronic medical record (EMR) as well as to a national dose registry.[2,3] Synergies can be achieved by utilizing a dose monitoring solution as a centralized portal to collect and send dose data to EMR’s and the DIR. 
 
Participating in the DIR provides an excellent path for imaging institutions to receive external feedback on how they perform against other facilities. However, without corrective action, that feedback is of limited value. By utilizing a dose monitoring solution, the institution can leverage the feedback from the DIR to internally investigate the underlying reasons for outliers. Only then, can appropriate actions be taken to reduce the overall radiation exposure to patients. 
 
Editor's note: The author Simon Häger is a Sectra DoseTrack team member. 
 
References
1. The American College of Radiology, "Dose Index Registry," 23 10 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/National-Radiology-Data-Registry/Dose-Index-Registry.
2. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Organizations, "Sentinel Event Alert 47," The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Organizations, 2011.
3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging," U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 9 2 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm200085.htm?sms_ss=email. [Accessed 23 10 2013].
     
 
 
 
 
 

Related Content

common adult CT examinations, computed tomography, diagnostic reference levels, DRLs, radiation dose, achievable dose, AD
News | Radiation Dose Management| February 23, 2017
Using data from the world’s largest computed tomography (CT) dose index registry, researchers have established national...
Children's Hospital Los Angeles, CHLA, Frank Ing, 3-D printed model, pulmonary artery

Pediatric interventional cardiologist Frank Ing, M.D., chief of the Division of Cardiology and co-director of the Heart Institute at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles. Photo courtesy of Children's Hospital Los Angeles.

Feature | 3-D Printing| February 22, 2017
When Children’s Hospital Los Angeles cardiologists found evidence that a portion of Nate Yamane’s pulmonary artery they...
GE Healthcare, GSI Xtream, FDA clearance, spectral CT, Revolution, RSNA 2017, SCCT
Technology | Computed Tomography (CT)| February 15, 2017
February 15, 2017 — GE Healthcare announced U.S.
HeartFlow FFRct Analysis, NICE guidance, U.K., United Kingdom, guidelines, stable chest pain
News | CT Angiography (CTA)| February 14, 2017
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom recently issued guidance for use of...
GE Healthcare, Rapiscan stress imaging agent, North America, Rapidscan Pharma Solutions Inc.
News | Pharmaceuticals| February 07, 2017
GE Healthcare’s Life Sciences business announced in January that it acquired Rapidscan Pharma Solutions Inc., which has...
CT, computed tomography, IV contrast media, acute kidney injury risk, Annals of Emergency Medicine study

A new study in Annals of Emergency Medicine finds no association between intravenous contrast media used in computed tomography (CT) and kidney damage. Roughly 80 million doses of IV contrast media are given every year. Credit: American College of Emergency Physicians

News | Contrast Media| January 30, 2017
Intravenous contrast media (typically iohexol or iodixanol) used in computed tomography (CT) does not appear to be...
blood pressure, gray zone, hypertension, personalized treatment, Circulation journal study, CT calcium scores
News | Hypertension| January 23, 2017
Using data from a national study, Johns Hopkins researchers determined that using heart computed tomography (CT) scans...
Technology | Radiation Dose Management| January 19, 2017
Zetta Medical Technologies announced the release of Zia, an iterative reconstruction solution that enables the use of...
diagnostic low-dose radiation exposure, radiological imaging dose, radiophobia, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, ALARA, LNTH
News | Radiation Dose Management| January 18, 2017
In an article published in the January 2017 issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, researchers assert that exposure...
Arterys, Cardiac MRI, cardiac MRI advances

An example of the Arterys blood flow imaging assessment software that can help automate cardiac MRI. 

Feature | Cardiac Imaging| January 16, 2017 | Dave Fornell
Each year imaging system manufacturers use the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) meeting at the end of the
Overlay Init