News | February 17, 2015

Most Clinical ‘Calculators’ Overestimate Heart Attack Risk

Researchers stress importance of individualized risk assessments

February 17, 2015 — Most “risk calculators” used by clinicians to gauge a patient’s chances of suffering a heart attack and guide treatment decisions appear to significantly overestimate the likelihood of a heart attack, according to results of a study by investigators at Johns Hopkins and other institutions.

Physicians commonly use standardized risk assessment systems, or algorithms, to decide whether someone needs care with daily aspirin and cholesterol-lowering drugs or just watchful waiting and follow-up exams. These algorithms calculate heart attack probability using a combination of factors, such as gender, age, smoking history, cholesterol levels, blood pressure and diabetes, among others.

The findings, reported in Annals of Internal Medicine, suggest four out of five widely used clinical calculators considerably overrate risk, including the most recent one unveiled in 2013 by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology amid controversy about its predictive accuracy.

The results of the study, the research team says, underscore the perils of over-reliance on standardized algorithms and highlight the importance of individualized risk assessment that includes additional variables; these include other medical conditions, family history of early heart disease, level of physical activity, and the presence and amount of calcium buildup in the heart’s vessels.

“Our results reveal a lack of predictive accuracy in risk calculators and highlight an urgent need to reexamine and fine-tune our existing risk assessment techniques,” said senior investigator Michael Blaha, M.D., MPH, director of clinical research at the Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease.

“The take-home message here is that as important as guidelines are, they are just a blueprint, a starting point for a conversation between patient and physician about the risks and benefits of different treatments or preventive strategies,” Blaha added.

In addition to patient safety, risk overestimation has important public health and economic ramifications, the investigators say.

“For example, cholesterol-lowering medicines, while clearly cost-effective in high-risk patients, are less so among low-risk patients,” said lead author Andrew Paul DeFilippis, M.D., M.Sc., assistant professor of medicine at the University of Louisville and adjunct assistant professor of medicine at the Ciccarone Center. “Therefore, overestimation of risk could lead to more healthcare spending, less health gain and unnecessary exposure to drug side effects.”

Prevention and treatment decisions are straightforward in some people, but many have borderline risk scores that leave them and their clinicians in a gray zone of uncertainty regarding therapy. Under the American Heart Association’s most recent guidelines, people who face a 7.5 percent risk of suffering a heart attack within 10 years are urged to consider preventive therapy with a cholesterol-lowering medication. Risk overestimation could be particularly problematic for those with marginal risk scores estimates, because it can put a person with a relatively low-risk profile into the “consider treatment” group. This is why patients with such borderline scores could benefit from further risk assessment with tests like computed tomography (CT) scans that visualize the degree of calcification in the arteries of the heart.

“Additional testing could be a much-needed tiebreaker in the all-too-common ‘to treat or not to treat’ dilemmas,” said study co-author Roger Blumenthal, M.D., professor of medicine and director of the Ciccarone Center. “Such testing should be considered in all patients with marginal risk scores — those in whom the decision to treat with long-term statin and aspirin remains unclear.”

The new findings stem from an ongoing study known as the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, or MESA, following some 7,000 men and women nationwide, ages 45 to 84, from different ethnic backgrounds without preexisting cardiovascular disease.

To check the accuracy of each one of five risk calculators, the investigators compared the number of predicted versus actual heart attacks and strokes among a group of more than 4,200 MESA participants, ages 50 to 74, followed over a decade. All people involved in the research were free of cardiovascular symptoms at the beginning of the study and had no history of heart attacks and strokes.

Four out of five risk scores analyzed in the study overestimated risk by anywhere from 37 percent to 154 percent in men and 8 percent to 67 percent in women.

The new American Heart Association calculator overestimated risk by 86 percent in men and by 67 percent in women. In the group with a predicted risk score between 7.5 to 10 percent — the threshold at which initiation of stain is recommended — the actual rate of heart attacks and strokes was only 3 percent in men and 5 percent in women, well below the risk level at which statins should be considered.

The least flawed prediction of heart attack risk was generated by the Reynolds risk score, which overestimated risk among men by only 9 percent, but underestimated it by 21 percent among women. In addition to age, gender, smoking, diabetes, cholesterol and blood pressure, the Reynolds score includes family history of early heart disease.

While not the subject of the current study, the researchers say the overestimation of risk likely stems from the fact that calculators, including the newest one, use risk reference data obtained decades ago, when more people were having heart attacks and strokes.

“Our next step is to explore the impact of multiple cardiovascular risk factors on risk score accuracy,” DeFilippis said. “Such an analysis will generate important insights about which factors need to be recalibrated and what new variables should be considered as we develop new risk scores for today’s patients.”

For more information: www.nhlbi.org

Related Content

NIAID Scientists Illuminate Mechanism of Increased Cardiovascular Risks With HIV
News | Cardiac Diagnostics| September 14, 2017
September 14, 2017 — Scientists at the National Institutes of Health have expanded the understanding of how chronic i
Marijuana Associated With Three-Fold Risk of Death From Hypertension
News | Hypertension| September 14, 2017
Marijuana use is associated with a three-fold risk of death from hypertension, according to research published recently...
News | Cardiac Diagnostics| September 12, 2017
Contracting shingles, a reactivation of the chickenpox virus, increases a person’s risk of stroke and heart attack,...
Vascular screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral artery disease and hypertension during the VIVA Study in Denmark

Vascular screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral artery disease and hypertension during the VIVA Study. Photo credit: Lisbeth Hasager Justesen, Viborg Hospital.

News | Cardiac Diagnostics| September 12, 2017
September 12, 2017 — A new screening program for vascular disease saves one life for every 169 men assessed, accordin
PURE study may cause revision of fat intake guidelines for cardiology.
Feature | ESC| September 07, 2017
September 7, 2017 — Researchers at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress called for a reconsideration of
Florida Medical Center First in State to Offer High Sensitive STAT Blood Test
News | Blood Testing| September 07, 2017
In July, The Heart Institute at Florida Medical Center became the first hospital in the state of Florida to offer the U...
Heart Failure Patients, Clinicians Have Differing Perceptions of Risk Level
News | Heart Failure| September 06, 2017
September 6, 2017 — Physicians identified a majority of patients with advanced...
Advances in FFR, FFR-CT, was the most popular cardiology story in August 2017.

The most popular article in August was about advances in fractional flow reserve (FFR) technologies. The image shows Philips' new version of its iFR system that displays hemodynamic pressure drop points in an overlay on live angiographic images, matching up the iFR readings with corresponding lesions.

Feature | September 01, 2017 | Dave Fornell
September 1, 2017 — Here is the list of the most popular articles and videos on the Diagnostic and Interventional Car
Sponsored Content | Videos | Cardiovascular Ultrasound| August 30, 2017
This video educational session, provided in partnership with the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE), is title
HeartSciences Announces CE Mark and European Launch of MyoVista High Sensitivity ECG

Just as a Doppler radar color image shows the energy of a storm, MyoVista provides physicians a detailed visual image of the energy distribution during the cardiac cycle.

News | ECG| August 22, 2017
HeartSciences announced the European launch of the MyoVista high sensitivity electrocardiograph (hsECG) Testing Device...
Overlay Init