Feature | April 01, 2014

ACC/AHA to Assess Value in Practice Guidelines, Performance Measures

April 1, 2014 — Citing accelerating healthcare costs and finite resources, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) announced they will begin incorporating value assessments into their clinical documents. 

The ACC and AHA elaborated on their decision, outlining the reasons for adding value assessments, reviewing the economic concepts associated with such assessments, and proposing a value ranking system in the ACC/AHA Statement on Cost/Value Methodology in Guidelines and Performance Measures. In addition, they highlighted future directions and needs.

“There is growing recognition that a more explicit, transparent and consistent evaluation of healthcare value is needed,” said Paul Heidenreich, M.D., writing committee co-chair and vice-chair for quality, clinical affairs and analytics in the department of medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine. “These value assessments will provide a more complete examination of cardiovascular care, helping to generate the best possible outcomes within the context of finite resources.”

The societies’ historical policy has been to only explicitly consider clinical efficacy and outcomes when drafting practice guidelines and performance measures. The document highlights that a “proposed level of value” will be added, with categories that include “high value,” “intermediate value,” “low value,” “uncertain value” and “value not assessed.”  The level of value will be accompanied by a level of evidence ranking (A, B, C) that shows the type of information used to make the value decision.   

To determine the level of value, the societies propose using the “quality-adjusted life-year” (QALY), a standard outcomes measure in economic evaluation. They further suggest utilizing the World Health Organization’s cost effectiveness benchmark — three times a country’s GDP per capita — as an upper threshold. Using this benchmark in the U.S. system, treatments that have a cost effectiveness ratio of $150,000/QALY or more would be considered low value.

Illustrating the need for more careful resource allocation, the statement cites data about increases in healthcare spending. According to data from the Henry J. Kaiser Foundation, U.S. per capita spending doubled between 1997 and 2010 and now consumes 17.9 percent of the GDP. At the state level, spending for Medicaid now surpasses that of all funding spent on education for kindergarten through 12th grade.

In addition, the statement cites the Dartmouth Atlas Project, which has for decades documented significant regional variations in care without substantial differences in health outcomes. 

While the statement provides compelling data on the need for change, it acknowledges the challenges involved in conducting value assessments. For example, treatment costs change over time and vary by location, complicating the evaluation process. Additionally, there is no national consensus about the extent to which cost should influence treatment decisions. Further, a limited number of cost effectiveness studies exist to provide the necessary evidence base.

Acknowledging these issues, the statement notes that momentum is increasing in the area of healthcare cost effectiveness and that the incorporation of value assessments in clinical guidance documents may further incentivize researchers, medical schools and other stakeholders to invest in the country’s move toward greater care value.

“Despite the dearth of cost effectiveness research, the evidence that is available is informative, and study quality is improving,” said Jeffrey L. Anderson, M.D., writing committee co-chair and associate chief of cardiology, Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute. “The hope of the writing committee is that this statement will further encourage researchers to include a value component in their study designs, providing an analysis of resource utilization and cost-benefit in multicenter trials.”

The societies caution that the new value category should be only one of several factors considered when making decisions about resource allocation. According to the statement, the level of value should be “broadly considered” while also looking at the risk-benefit ratio and the level/quality of evidence for the specific clinical recommendation in a specific patient. It adds that providers and society may be willing to pay more if a treatment is the only one available for a rare disease.

Finally, while the statement notes that the societies will “not yet be prescriptive” in how best to use the value assessments at the point of care, it does provide general ideas on their responsible integration, as well as on their potential benefit to patients and the public. “The ACC and AHA recognize that payers, providers and patients may have different views on how to incorporate value into medical care, but they all will benefit from having more cost and value data available,” said Heidennreich.

For more information: www.cardiosource.org, www.americanheart.org

Related Content

News | Cath Lab| October 09, 2015
October 9, 2015 — Cardinal Health is launching its expanded portfolio in the cardiova
Shimadzu, MIX package, Trinias Cardiovascular suites, U.S. availability

Image courtesy of Shimadzu Medical Systems

Technology | Cath Lab| October 08, 2015
Shimadzu Medical Systems USA announced the availability of the MIX package for the Trinias Cardiovascular suites. Based...
CardioSecur mobile ECG, 22-lead, 360 degree view of the heart, CardioSecur Pro

Image courtesy of CardioSecur

Technology | ECG| October 08, 2015
Personal MedSystems introduced the first and only 22-lead mobile electrocardiogram (ECG) system, CardioSecur, at the...
Invitae Corp., cardiovascular test panels, genetic testing, expands offerings
Technology | Genetic Testing| October 08, 2015
Invitae Corp., a genetic information company, announced the expansion of its cardiology offering, including more than...
ORSIF, radiation exposure for interventionalists, greater on left side of head, Ehtisham Mahmud
Feature | Radiation Dose Management| October 06, 2015
The results of a research study indicate that interventional cardiologists receive “very high” radiation exposure...
Synergy stent
Technology | October 05, 2015
October 5, 2015 — The U.S.
News | Heart Failure| October 02, 2015
Cyberonics Inc. announced results from the extension of the ANTHEM-HF clinical study (ENCORE Study). Results of the...
Tryton Side Branch Stent, clinical trial results, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Tryton Side Branch Stent image courtesy of Tryton Medical

News | Stents Bifurcation| October 02, 2015
October 2, 2015 — Tryton Medical Inc.
Brilinta, 60 mg dose available, U.S. pharmacies
Technology | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| October 02, 2015
AstraZeneca announced that Brilinta (ticagrelor) 60-mg tablets are now available in U.S. pharmacies. On Sept. 3, 2015,...
Intact Vascular, TOBA II study, Tack Endovascular System

Image courtesy of Intact Vascular

News | Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)| October 01, 2015
Intact Vascular Inc. announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted conditional approval for a U.S. and...
Overlay Init