Feature | July 28, 2014

Cardiologist Unveils Technique to Help Reduce Risk of Hypertension Misdiagnosis

Evidence suggests that single blood pressure measurements during physical examinations in doctors' offices may be misleading due to multiple factors

July 28, 2014 — Robert Smith, a cardiologist at Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center in Hartford, Conn., released the results of his retrospective study designed to compare single in-office automated blood pressure readings to the average of multiple automated blood pressure readings. Blood pressure readings were collected on 187 adult patients using a Welch Allyn Connex Vital Signs Monitor (Model 6300) with Office Profile and automatic base-lining technology enabled. The quantitative analysis shows that blood pressure diagnosis varies over a range of consecutive readings suggesting that it can be important to calculate an average blood pressure in order to obtain the most accurate representation of the true blood pressure in the doctor’s office.

“The purpose of this study was to compare single in-office blood pressure readings to average in-office blood pressure readings and observe the differences in accuracy and potential variation in diagnoses between the two methodologies,” said Smith. “An inaccurate diagnosis of high blood pressure could lead to the overprescribing of blood pressure-lowering medications, which may result in adverse events associated with hypotension, which is the last thing we want for patients. As doctors our mantra is and always will be, ‘first, do no harm.’”

To mimic the true office experience, Smith and his staff started the first blood pressure measurements at varied times after patients entered the exam room one to three minutes into the test. Five subsequent measurements were taken at intervals of one minute, and the monitor automatically calculated a recommended average that included up to six of these measurements. Several factors can affect the accuracy of blood pressure measurements including, but not limited to, talking or active listening, distended bladder, cuff over clothing, smoking within 30 minutes of measurement, back unsupported or an unsupported arm while sitting or standing.

Results showed that with averaged readings half of the patients previously classified as hypertensive using the single reading methodology were reclassified into pre- and normotensive categories. More than half of the patients that would have required the physician to provide hypertensive care did not display the medical need with an averaged reading.

“The study provides observational data that supports the premise that patients may significantly benefit from the use of automated, unattended blood pressure measurement techniques that adopt blood pressure averaging,” said Pooja Sinha, manager, Vital Signs Solutions at Welch Allyn. “Unfortunately, misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary lifestyle changes for patients, thus decreasing quality of life. Patients that initially would have been categorized as pre-hypertensive based on a single first reading were classified as normal based on the average readings. Finding the average could make for a better outcome for patients.”

For more information: www.welchallyn.com

Related Content

Medisafe, medication management, mHealth platform, blood pressure study, hypertension, adherence
News | Hypertension| September 25, 2015
Medisafe, an mHealth platform for medication management, announced the results of its blood pressure study, which...

Big data from regional health exchanges can help identify patients who are at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease and stroke based on blood pressure readings and trends from their office visits over time that arestored in the electronic health records. This information can be used to target these patients with more followups, education and more intensive prevention programs. 

Feature | Information Technology| September 22, 2015 | Jeff Zagoudis and Dave Fornell
As healthcare converts to an entirely electronic health record (EHR)-based system, it opens up new opportunities to m
SPRINT, blood pressure management, UAB, save lives
Feature | Hypertension| September 16, 2015
September 16, 2015 — Initial results of a landmark clinical trial found patients randomized to a systolic blood press
News | Hypertension| September 10, 2015
Sunshine Heart Inc. announced commencement of a new study examining the impact of the C-Pulse system on pulmonary...
News | Hypertension| August 27, 2015
August 27, 2015 — Analysis of blood samples from more than 5,000 people suggests that a more sensitive version of a b
ASE, echocardiography, hypertension, document, EACVI, JASE, Thomas H. Marwick
Feature | Cardiovascular Ultrasound| July 07, 2015
A new document from the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) provides detailed guidance for clinicians on how to...
blood pressure, LDL, medication therapy, coronary plaque, SCAI
News | May 14, 2015
Combining statins for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and calcium channel antagonists for blood pressure reduces harmful...
Vessix Renal Denervation System, REDUCE-HTN: REINFORCE, high blood pressure

Vessix System image courtesy of Boston Scientific Corp.

News | May 04, 2015
Boston Scientific Corp. is taking a new approach to evaluate the performance of the Vessix Renal Denervation System,...
News | April 09, 2015
A study including more than 20,000 adults in China found combined use of the hypertension medication enalapril and...
Feature | April 01, 2015
Medtronic plc announced the initiation of the SPYRAL HTN Global Clinical Trial Program, a phased clinical program...
Overlay Init