Feature | October 01, 2010| Dave Fornell

Impella Registry Shows Significant Outcome Improvements

October 1, 2010 – The most recent clinical data from USpella, a U.S. multicenter, observational registry of patients who received percutaneous cardiac support from the Impella 2.5 device, was released at TCT 2010 last week.

The Impella left ventricular assist device (VAD) is used in some of the sickest patients with compromised cardiac function. Registry data showed 90 percent of the survivors recovered native cardiac function and were discharged with their own hearts. Significant improvement was also seen in 49 percent of patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class, with a 61 percent reduction in NYHA Class IV patients.

Data from 24 U.S. and Canadian centers have contributed data for a total of 352 patients. The updated results were presented during an sessions by William O’Neill, M.D., University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and Brijeshwar Maini, M.D., Pinnacle Health and Vascular Institute.

Key results after prophylactic Impella supported revascularization:

• Significant (17 percent) improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction

• Significant improvement (49 percent of patients) in NYHA class with 61 percent reduction in NYHA class four

• Significant (25 percent) reduction in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) target population, leading to potential cost savings

• More than half of the patients (54 percent) were turned down for cardiovascular bypass graft surgery (CABG), 59 percent of the patients had experienced a prior myocardial infarction (MI)

• Low mortality (3.9 percent) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) event rate (8.2 percent) in patients, compared to high risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) literature (Syed Al, et al. Cardiovascular Revasc Med 2010, 1191-7)

“This is not a cherry-picked group for this study, O’Neill said, pointing out the registry reflects real-world patient experience.
He said many of these patients had diabetes, peripheral vascular disease and heart failure.

Registry data has clarified one area of concern for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which was possible damage to the aortic valve where the Impella enters the heart. However, O’Neill said this is not an issue, with zero problems reported at 30 days.

Other registry data after emergent Impella support:

• Hemodynamic support with the Impella 2.5 (Cardiac Index, Cardiac Power Output, Wedge Pressure, Mean Arterial Pressure) significantly increased over the IAB in this study

• Impella improves Cardiac Power Output (CPO), the strongest correlate of in-hospital mortality (CPO increased from 0.5 +0.2 before Impella support to 1.0 + 0.2 after Impella support)

• Significant (19 percent) improvement of LVEF at discharge

• Significant reduction (59 percent) in mortality in the group that received Impella before PCI

• Ninety percent of the survivors recovered native cardiac function and were discharged with their own hearts

Use Before or After PCI?

To data the Impella has been used in the majority of cases after PCI, but O’Neill said an increasing number of patients are being placed on Impella support prior to PCI to increase perfusion. He attributes the increase to physicians becoming more comfortable with the device and faster set up times.

He pointed to acute myocardial infarction shock patients who have been placed on the device and lower mortality rates for those placed on support prior to PCI (mortality of 23 percent pre-PCI vs. 56 percent post-PCI).

“I think putting the device in before PCI is very important to myocardial salvage,” O’Neill said. “I think that should become a standard.”

John Lasala, M.D., Ph.D., Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, agreed the device offers myocardial protection in heart attack patients. “It can provide better support and provide perfusion even before PCI,” he said. “We are clearly improving collateral flow with the Impella.”

Impella vs. IABPs

The Impella is sometimes used as a bailout device after intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) could not deliver enough hemodynamic support, O’Neill said. A randomized study is really needed to draw conclusions, he said, but pointed to Impella registry data so far has shown 20 percent of patients are placed on the device after IABPs.

“We know patients on a balloon pump who were not doing well did better when they were switched to Impella,” O’Neill said.

A comparison between Impella and IABPs is being conducted in the PROTECT II trial. It began two years ago and has recruited about 654 patients, which is about 60 percent of the planned enrollment. The trial is should to be completed by 2012.

For more information: www.abiomed.com

Related Content

St. Jude Medical, ADO II AS trial, congenital heart disease, PDA, Amplatzer Duct Occluder II AS
News | Congenital Heart| October 19, 2016
St. Jude Medical Inc. announced the launch of the ADO II AS (AMPLATZER Duct Occluder II Additional Sizes) pediatric...
Lantheus, flurpiridaz F-18, myocardial perfusion imaging, MPI, cardiac stress testing, ASNC 2016
News | Radiopharmaceuticals and Tracers| October 17, 2016
Lantheus Holdings Inc. announced in late September that sub-analysis data from the first Phase 3 study of flurpiridaz F...
Medtronic, FIRE AND ICE trial, Arctic Front, cryoballoon catheter ablation, radiofrequency RF ablation, study results, Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Sessions
News | Ablation Systems| October 17, 2016
Medtronic plc last week unveiled new health economic analysis data from the FIRE AND ICE trial that favor cryoballoon...
transcarotid artery revascularization, TCAR Surveillance Project, Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization, SVS PSO,
News | Stents Carotid| October 13, 2016
A surveillance project to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in...
Shockwave lithoplasty system, VIVA 16, Vascular Interventioanl Advances, VIA Physicians, late-breaking endovascular clinical trial results
News | Cath Lab| October 12, 2016
VIVA (Vascular Interventional Advances) Physicians announced a number of highly anticipated late-breaking clinical...
ZipLine Medical, Zip Surgical Skin Closure, cath lab time savings, PACE study
News | EP Lab| October 10, 2016
October 10, 2016 — ZipLine Medical Inc.
Mercator MedSystems, Bullfrog Micro-Infusion Device, DANCE trial, VIVA 2016, 13-month results
News | Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)| October 07, 2016
Mercator MedSystems recently announced that 13-month data from the DANCE trial was presented during a late-breaking...
Heartware HVAD, ventricular assist device, artificial heart, Medtronic
News | October 05, 2016
October 5, 2016 — Medtronic said two previously communicated global voluntary recalls related to the HeartWare Intern
Keystone Heart, TriGuard Embolic Protection Device, Neuro-TAVR study, brain lesions, American Journal of Cardiology
News | Heart Valve Technology| October 03, 2016
Keystone Heart Ltd. announced data recently published in the American Journal of Cardiology demonstrating new brain...
CardioKinetix, Parachute device, Heart Failure device therapy

The CardioKinetix Parachute device implant shown deployed in the left ventricle of a heart failure patient. The device helps remodel the ventricle to improve the heart's ability to pump blood more efficiently. 

Feature | Heart Failure| September 29, 2016 | Abha Mishra
New cardiovascular device therapies for atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are rapidly evolving with the
Overlay Init