Feature | March 06, 2013| Dave Fornell

The Radial Access Adoption Report Card

Over the past decade in the United States, there has been growing interest in transradial artery percutaneous access as a way to significantly reduce bleeding rates and access site complications. However, adoption in the United States has been slow compared to other parts of the world, partly due to lack of training in interventional programs until recently. In articles and sessions at various cardiology conferences, I have heard varying U.S. adoption rate percentages.  

One of the biggest advocates for expanding radial access is Sunil V. Rao, M.D., FACC, assistant professor of medicine at Duke University Medical Center and director of the cardiac cath lab at the Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, N.C. He asked the same question about U.S. radial access usage and found it accounted for 3 percent of cath lab access in his 2008 study[1] of the American College of Cardiology’s CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). The CathPCI Registry collects data from about 85 percent of the cardiac cath labs in the United States.

Since 2008, there has been a big push from radial evangelists such as Rao and others to spread the word about the benefits of radial access.  That message has been amplified in recent years in an era of reduced reimbursements and healthcare reform forcing hospitals to look for new ways to reduce costs, including reducing hospital length of stay and complications.

An updated NCDR snapshot of radial access between January 2010 and June 2011 was published in December 2012.  The study showed radial access usage rose to 8.3 percent[2], based on a review of 1.1 million patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization and 941,248 undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 

This growth rate combined with the introduction of radial training programs in recent years has some experts now predicting a 15 percent radial access usage rate by 2014. 

I wrote a column three years ago that asked why radial access is not more widely used if study after study shows it can slash complication rates, increase patient safety and reduce length of stay and nursing time?  The question I posed then still stands. Out of all the columns and articles ever written in DAIC, that column generated, by far, the most reader comments we ever received. DAIC’s most read website content also includes several transradial access stories in the top 20 articles for 2012. 

One major change that could spur radial’s increased usage would be recognition of its benefits by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) by offering higher reimbursements for radial over femoral access. From the level of evidence seen in studies, this increased cost would be offset downstream by greatly lowering the costs to treat complications. 

 

References: 

 

1. Sunil V. Rao, Fang-Shu Ou, Tracy Y. Wang, et al. “Trends in the Prevalence and Outcomes of Radial and Femoral Approaches to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.” J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2008;1(4):379-386. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.007.

2. Gregory J. Dehmer, Douglas Weaver, Matthew T. Roe, et al. “A Contemporary View of Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States A Report From the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 Through June 2011.” J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(20):2017-2031. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.966

 

Related Content

TOBA-BTK study, twelve-month results, SCAI 2016, Tack Endovascular System, critical limb ischemia
News | Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)| May 05, 2016
Intact Vascular Inc. announced that positive twelve-month results from its Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty – Below-...
SCAI, cath lab, best practices, guidelines, 2016
News | Cath Lab| May 05, 2016
May 5, 2016 — The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) published an update to its 2012 pap
FDA, CDRH, national evaluation system, medical device development
Feature | Business| May 04, 2016
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it is building the foundations of a national evaluation system to...
radiation dose in the cath lab
News | Radiation Dose Management| May 02, 2016
May 2, 2016 — Starting at the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) 2016 annual meeting May
Feature | Business| April 28, 2016 | Dave Fornell
 
Technology | Stents Peripheral| April 27, 2016
Veniti Inc. announced the first successful treatment with the Vici Verto Venous Stent System of a patient suffering...
Auris Surgical Robotics, acquisition, Hansen Medical
News | Robotic Systems| April 26, 2016
Auris Surgical Robotics Inc. and Hansen Medical Inc. announced that they have signed a definitive merger agreement...
Siemens Sensis Vibe, hemodyanamics system

Siemens released the Sensis Vibe hemodyanamics system at ACC.16. The newer system offers better integration of cath lab data into cath lab reports and the electronic medical record (EMR).

Feature | ACC| April 25, 2016 | Jon Brubaker, MBA, RCVT, Tom Watson, BS, RCVT, and Sabrina Newell MS, RCS
There were several trends seen in new cardiovascular technologies showcased on the expo floor at the 2016 American...
Medtronic, Drug-Filled Stent, RevElution Trial results, ACC.16, CE Mark
News | Stents Drug Eluting| April 21, 2016
Medtronic plc announced new clinical data from one of the endpoints in the RevElution Trial for its novel, next-...
Boston Scientific, Fetch 2 aspiration catheter, Class 1 recall
News | Thrombectomy Devices| April 20, 2016
April 20, 2016 — Boston Scientific Corp. announced a U.S.
Overlay Init