Feature | March 18, 2011| Mladen I. Vidovich, M.D, FACC, FSCAI

Radial May Benefit From Power Injectors, 4 French Angiography

Down-sizing is right-sizing when it comes to transradial procedures

Medrads Avanta power contrast injection system. Power injectors allow smaller 4 French catheters to be used when performing radial access procedures.

With power contrast injectors, cath lab operators can use a hand controller unit, allowing increased distance from the X-ray source, significantly reducing radiation exposure to the operator. Pictured is the Acist CVi system.

The hand controller from the Acist CVi system.

Radial artery occlusion rate during transradial access procedures is strongly related to sheath and catheter size. Although worldwide most experienced practitioners (90 percent) use 5 and 6 French systems(1), high-quality coronary artery opacification can be obtained with 4 French systems. However, high-flow states (arteriovenous [AV] fistulae in hemodialysis patients), large coronaries encountered in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy or cold, high-viscosity contrast media frequently impact image quality.

Currently, there are two power contrast injection systems specifically designed for use in the cardiac catheterization laboratories: Medrad’s Avanta and the Acist CVi. Many cardiac catheterization laboratories use these systems, since they provide reliable injection rates and optimal coronary opacification using smaller French systems.

These devices are usually table-mounted and have sufficient contrast storage to allow performance of several procedures during a regular day. This significantly reduces contrast waste between procedures. The “multi-patient” disposable part is then attached to the single-patient disposable unit. Compared to the well-known but bulky traditional manifolds frequently seen in cardiac catheterization laboratories, these systems are quite nimble. Once the tubing from the power injector is attached to the coronary catheter, the operator only needs to hold the hand controller unit. This is not trivial, since it allows increased distance from the radiation source and significantly reduces radiation exposure to the operator. Another very tangible benefit is the seamless transition from injection to pressure tracing – since there is no manifold, there are no stopcocks to turn.

Published studies support the use of these devices and show contrast volume is consistently reduced and equivalent vessel opacification can be achieved.(2) When comparing 6 and 4 French systems, one study found no difference in image quality and less contrast use with the 4 French system.(3) Despite these advantages, only a minority of operators currently use 4 French systems.

In our opinion, since radial artery occlusion rates are associated with catheter size, we recommend using the smallest catheter necessary to obtain optimal coronary opacification. “Down-sizing” diagnostic catheters goes hand in hand with “right-sizing” interventional equipment. A large percentage of percutaneous coronary interventions can be performed with 5 French guiding catheters, and power injectors are exceptionally well suited for interventional use.

1. Bertrand, O. F., S. V. Rao, et al. (2010). “Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey.” JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, 2010, 3 (10): 1022-1031.

2. Chahoud, G., S. Khoukaz, et al. “Randomized comparison of coronary angiography using 4 French catheters: 4 French manual versus ‘Acisted’ power injection technique.” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2001, 53 (2): 221-224.

3. Hou, L., Y. D. Wei, et al. “Comparative study of 4 French catheters using the Acist variable rate injector system versus 6 French catheters using hand manifold in diagnostic coronary angiography via transradial approach.” Chinese Medical Journal (Engl), 2010, 123 (11): 1373-1376.

Related Content

Radial access, transradial access, radial artery access, drapes, drape

Radial Access Sleeve with normal arm adduction.

Feature | Radial Access| October 07, 2016 | Richard Casazza MS RT(R)
The transradial revolution is one of the fastest growing trends in cardiology.
radial access, inserting stents, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions study
News | Radial Access| July 13, 2016
A new study in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions supports access through the wrist, or radial access, as the default...
radial access, transradial
Feature | Radial Access| May 27, 2016 | Dave Fornell
The use of transradial artery vascular access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States has s
Osprey Avert
News | Cath Lab| May 13, 2016
May 13, 2016 — In the largest study of its kind, a new device has been found to significantly reduce the volume of ra
GlobalData, contrast media injectors market,
News | Contrast Media Injectors| May 03, 2016
The global market for contrast media injectors is set to increase from $830 million in 2015 to almost $1.8 billion by...
radial access, robotic navigation
Feature | Radial Access| March 28, 2016 | Amir Kaki M.D., FACC, FSCAI, Medical Director Cardiac Cath Laboratories, Detroit Medical Center
Millions of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are performed each year around the world to treat obstructive
Merit Medical, ThinkRadial training course, radial interventional access, first in Europe
News | Radial Access| March 08, 2016
Merit Medical Systems Inc. announced that the first ThinkRadial course to be held at its European headquarters in...
heart attack patients, rescue PCI, transradial and transfemoral approach, Perelman School of Medicine
News | Vascular Access| January 04, 2016
January 4, 2016 — In a comparison of bleeding complications and mortality between transradial and transfemoral...
radial access
Feature | Radial Access| December 29, 2015
December 29, 2015 — Although using the radial artery as the access point for angioplasty has been linked to reduced b
Overlay Init