Feature | July 17, 2009| Dave Fornell

Remote Monitoring of Implantable Devices is the Future

There has been a growing trend in electrophysiology toward remote, home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, pacemakers and implantable cardiac monitors. These systems were displayed prominently on the show floor and discussed in several sessions in May at Heart Rhythm 2009 in Boston.

“Every cardiac monitoring device should have remote monitoring capability,” said Niraj Varma, M.D., Ph.D., FRCP, Center for Electrical Therapies in the Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart and Vascular Institute at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, during presentations at HRS. “It delivers clinically relevant information.”

He argued remote monitoring helps improve work efficiency, reduces loads on clinics, improves adherence to scheduled follow-ups, and enables early detection of more severe cardiac problems.
ICDs were introduced in 1989, and today more than 2 million patients have them implanted, Dr. Varma said. However, as this number grows each year with new patients being implanted and those already with them living longer, the number of patient follow-ups to monitor these devices is staggering.
“It’s a burden on the patient… not only in terms of distance and time, but the need to take off work,” Dr, Varma said. He said getting time off work is sometimes a problem, or the distances involved are great, so appointments are often missed, along with any opportunity for early detection of potential problems.
In 2001 Biotronik was the first company with an FDA-approved remote monitoring system, Home Monitoring, said Dominic A. Theuns, Ph.D., MSC, FACC, department of clinical electrophysiology Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, during HRS. He said Medtronic followed in 2005 with CareLink, Boston Scientific in 2006 with Latitude, and St. Jude in 2007 with House Call.

In 2006 the Heart Rhythm Society made a call to manufacturers to create home monitoring systems so the devices could be used as an early detection system of looming cardiac problems. Many of the new cardiac rhythm devices released in the past couple years have met this criteria.

Since these remote monitoring systems have been implemented, Dr. Varma said the adherence to regular monitoring has improved greatly with patients using remote monitoring-capable implants. He said triggers can be set for events that automatically send an update on the patient’s condition to the physician’s office using the remote monitoring transmission system. These triggers can include settings that are out of range, delivered shocks, or other parameters set by the doctor.

Dr. Varma said remote monitoring is also ideal for watching patients with questionable hardware following recalls. He pointed to the recall of the Sprint Fidelis lead, where patients can be monitored remotely to watch for problems, instead of the more expensive option of having the patient go through another procedure to install new leads.

While remote monitoring eases the burden of follow-ups on patients and clinics and allows for improved patient care, it also enables clinics to charge for more frequent checkups. Dr. Varma points out the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare (CMS) allows for reimbursement of remote monitoring services, which can be billed once every 90 days.

Dr. Theuns agreed remote monitoring has benefits, but he also argued the technology is not at the level of sophistication some manufacturers would lead EP physicians to believe. He said it will likely be years before ideal remote monitoring systems are developed. He points out some CRT and ICD devices, and the majority of pacemakers, do not have remote monitoring capabilities. Patients still need to be next to their Web-enabled transmitter to make a connection to send a report, so if an event happens away from home, it is not automatically reported.

He also pointed to technologies that are said to enhance the early warning capability of implantable devices, but have limited predictive value. Medtronic’s OptiVol technology is touted as a solution on implantable devices to detect heart failure, which coupled with a remote monitoring system sounds like an ideal solution to keep an eye on patients with signs of heart failure. However, Dr. Theuns said its predictive value is actually not very that great. He said it only detects about a third of the heart failure cases, because it only detects one type of symptom.

Despite some drawbacks, progress continues. At HRS Dr. Varma also announced data from a study using Biotronik’s Home Monitoring system for early detection of all arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmia and ventricular fibrillation. He said it took less than three days to detect these problems, versus more than 30 days using conventional office follow-ups.

Related Content

Boston Scientific, HeartLogic Heart Failure Diagnostic Service, MultiSENSE trial data, AHA Scientific Sessions 2016
News | Heart Failure| November 18, 2016
Boston Scientific recently announced results from the first clinical trial evaluating the performance of the HeartLogic...
Medtronic, Claria MRI Quad CRT-D SureScan, FDA approval
Technology | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices (CRT)| November 15, 2016
Medtronic plc  has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the Claria MRI Quad Cardiac...
transcatheter aortic valve replacement, pacemakers, implantation, post-TAVR implantation, worse outcomes, study
News | EP Lab| November 09, 2016
Patients who undergo minimally invasive heart valve replacement, known as transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR...
smartphone application, heart attack detection, University of Turku Finland
News | Remote Monitoring| October 28, 2016
A smartphone application developed by researchers at the University of Turku, Finland, can detect myocardial infarction...
iSmartweaR, smart clothing, jIndustrial Technology Research Institute, ITRI, wearable heart monitoring

An example of an iSmartweaR shirt that can monitor patient vital signs without the need for electrode wires.

News | Wearable Sensors| October 24, 2016
October 24, 2016 — Conventional smart clothing uses conductive fibers or rubber as sensing electrodes, and cardiac el
News | Wearable Sensors| October 13, 2016
Biotricity Inc. announced recently that it will be expanding its existing research partnership with the University of...
Medtronic, FDA approval, MRI, MR-conditional scanning, cardiac devices
Technology | EP Lab| October 13, 2016
Medtronic plc is the first company to receive U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for its suite of cardiac...
AirStrip One, ECG management, web client, U.S. clearance
Technology | ECG| October 11, 2016
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued 510(K) Class II clearance to a web client for the AirStrip One...
European Heart Rhythm Association, EHRA White Book 2016, EP Europace supplement, cardiac rhythm device use, Europe
News | EP Lab| September 27, 2016
In August, the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and EP Europace journal announced the release of the supplement...
Overlay Init