Feature | July 09, 2013

Should Radiologists be the Gatekeepers of Medical Imaging?

Lessons from across the pond

Medical Imaging U.S. Healthcare Overtesting New England Journal of Medicine

July 9, 2013 — Big changes are coming to the U.S. healthcare system — some in response to the mounting scrutiny of medical imaging. New task force recommendations, the Choosing Wisely campaign and Affordable Care Act policies are all attempting to curtail overtesting — with computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and any other screening often ordered unnecessarily — that can drive up medical costs, lead to waste and unnecessary radiation, and prompt undue anxiety about false positive results.

These are all worthy efforts, but to really make an impact, a paradigm shift in clinical care will have to happen, Saurabh Jha, MB, BS, of the department of radiology in the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, suggests in a New England Journal of Medicine article.

Radiologists must become the gatekeepers of medical imaging, as opposed to serving as just service providers for patients, he writes. In the face of tighter guidelines and ultimately less leeway for physicians to order potentially superfluous tests, he calls on radiologists to be the ones who step forward and manage imaging utilization. But first, they need the power to do so.

“The emphasis on service provision, operations and efficiency has pushed radiologists to the periphery of clinical decision making," Jha writes. “To be effective gatekeepers, they will have to move to the center.”

In the piece, titled “From Imaging Gatekeeper to Service Provider — A Transatlantic Journey,” Jha opens with an anecdote, a trip down memory lane that introduces us to “Dr. No,” a radiologist in Great Britain (where he did his surgery residency) known for turning down requests for scans. Dr. No needed a justified reason, as the country’s system faced limited imaging resources. In other words, you had to have a pretty good reason to order that CT, because often the diagnosis could be found another way.

“[In Britain], radiologists acted as gatekeepers,” he writes. “To get through the gate, clinicians had to be at the top of their game. To triage effectively, radiologists had to think like the referring physicians. Both sides pushed each other, and the net clinical acumen improved.”

Here in the United States, Jha came upon a different approach to treating patients. Fear of displeasing referring physicians or even being perceived as “rationing” care, he noticed, had many radiologists acting more like “Dr. Yes” more often than not.

The healthcare system in the United Kingdom is set up differently from the United States, but there are perhaps some lessons to be learned here, Jha suggests, if we want to get out of the “imaging boom.” Mainly, it shows us that a radiologist, acting as the gatekeeper, can exercise restraint in imaging utilization, he says.

Remember, “gatekeepers don’t simply advise on the best imaging method,” he writes. “They question whether a given diagnosis should be suspected in the first place.”

But such a shift will require two key changes to our health system. The incentive system needs to be changed, as are there no rewards for denying an imaging study — one loses a reimbursable exam and expends time in which other reimbursable studies can be read. But there is a bigger obstacle, he writes: the service-provision mindset. Radiologists do not wish to displease referring physicians, lest they take their business to someone who won’t question their test-ordering ability.

So how do they move to the center and away from the fringe? “They’ll have to develop clinical imaging conferences, act as imaging consultants and conduct imaging rounds. Radiology leadership must provide incentives for these activities without compromising efficiency, by developing granular metrics for quality,” he writes.

Benchmarks will also have to be established for the acceptable proportion of negative studies, and bundled payments for accountable care organizations could offer a sentinel opportunity to face these challenges.

Either way, change is coming and radiologists must decide whether to “greet the ebb of imaging passively or by stepping forward to captain and manage a rational decline,” he concludes.

For more information: www.newswise.com/institutions/newsroom/134/

Related Content

Philips, FDA 510k clearance, Expression MR400, MRI patient monitor
Technology | Patient Monitors| February 11, 2016
Royal Philips announced U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) clearance for the Expression MR400, a new...
Allegheny General Hospital, MRI, patients with implantable cardiac devices, safety and effectiveness
News | EP Lab| February 01, 2016
The findings of a major study led by cardiovascular imaging specialists at Allegheny General Hospital (AGH) suggest...
critical limb ischemia, amputations, MRI-based mapping, CLI, British Heart Foundation
News | Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)| January 28, 2016
A new imaging technique could reduce the need for amputation in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), according...
Image Wisely, annual pledge process, medical imaging, radiation safety
News | Radiation Dose Management| January 27, 2016
Image Wisely participants must now make yearly commitments, as opposed to a one-time pledge, confirming their ongoing...
Medic Vision, SafeCT Enterprise, St. Joseph's/Candler Health System, Georgia
News | Computed Tomography (CT)| January 26, 2016
Medic Vision Imaging Solutions Ltd. announced the installation of SafeCT (computed tomography) at St. Joseph’s/Candler...
ECRI Institute, Rate This Model, medical equipment, review/rating tool
News | Business| January 25, 2016
Now, medical technology purchasers and users have an instant online forum to rate and review technologies they are...
ACC, ACR, chest pain, diagnostic imaging, emergency department, recommendations document
News | Cardiac Imaging| January 25, 2016
New recommendations from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American College of Radiology (ACR) have...
Siemens, Magnetom Amira MRI scanner, FDA clearance
Technology | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)| January 21, 2016
Siemens Healthcare announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared the Magnetom Amira 1.5 Tesla...
MRI sensitivity, metamaterials, ITMO University, Advanced Materials

Artist's view of a biological object placed on a metasurface resonator. Image courtesy of Advanced Materials.

News | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)| January 20, 2016
A group of researchers from Russia, Australia and the Netherlands have developed a technology that can reduce magnetic...
Cath lab radiation dose reduaction, doseaware, raysafe

The Philips DoseAware Xtend system is an advanced version of the Unfors RaySafe system, combining real time radiation detection badges and a live video screen showing each person in the cath lab in a different color. The system reports their real-time exposure rate and cumulative dose since the start of a procedure. It shows changes in dose exposure the closer a person gets to the C-arm.

Feature | Cardiac Imaging| January 12, 2016 | Dave Fornell
Each year radiology vendors use the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) meeting as a springboard to unveil t
Overlay Init