Feature | March 27, 2012

Study Shows Significant Mismatch Between Angiography, FFR Evaluation

March 24, 2012 — Coronary angiography is unable to accurately predict the severity of vessel narrowing, suggesting fractional flow reserve (FFR) functional tests should be added to help determine if a patient needs revascularization. This was according to research presented from the IRIS FFR-DEFER trial at the American College of Cardiology's (ACC) 61st Annual Scientific Session this week in Chicago. 


Seeking to improve physicians’ decision-making process when determining if a patient needs revascularization, a South Korean research team compared two different methods of evaluating arterial narrowing: coronary angiography and FFR. Currently, coronary angiography is commonly used to determine the need for revascularization, while FFR is included in practice guidelines but less frequently utilized. FFR uses an catheter probe to measure the level of blood flow before and after a stenotic lesion to determine how much the narrowing is affecting arterial function.


Specifically, the team wanted to determine why there is often a discrepancy, called a “visual-functional mismatch,” between the findings of these tests when performed on the same vessel.


“There are often notable discrepancies between the angiographic diameter stenosis and the physiologic significance of the lesion,” said lead investigator Seung-Jung Park, M.D., Ph.D., professor of medicine at Asan Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea. 


“We conducted the study to provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors responsible for this ‘visual-functional mismatch,’ which we believed would be helpful to overcome interventionalists’ excessive preoccupation with using angiography to decide whether to treat or not to treat,” he said. 


The researchers enrolled 1,000 patients with 1,129 lesions between November 2009 and June 2011 at a single center in Seoul, South Korea. Sixty-three patients had left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesions (a more complex type of narrowing; number of lesions=63), while 937 patients had non-LMCA lesions (number of lesions=1,066). The researchers completed three tests on each lesion: coronary angiography, FFR and intravascular ultrasound. They then examined the occurrence of visual-functional mismatch and analyzed the factors that led to the discrepancies between coronary angiography and FFR. 


They found that among patients with non-LMCA (less complex) lesions, there were 605 lesions in which coronary angiography showed that the vessel had narrowed by more than 50 percent (suggesting that the heart may not be getting enough oxygen, a condition called “myocardial ischemia”). Of these lesions, 343 (57 percent) showed a FFR of greater than or equal to 0.80 (no more than a 20 percent reduction in blood flow, suggesting that ischemia was unlikely), resulting in a visual-functional mismatch. 


Conversely, among the 461 non-LMCA lesions with less than or equal to 50 percent vessel narrowing (suggesting that ischemia was unlikely), 75 (16 percent) had an FFR of less than 0.80 (more than a 20 percent reduction in blood flow, suggesting that ischemia was likely), resulting in a “reverse” visual-functional mismatch. 


In the LMCA group, mismatch was seen in 8 lesions (35 percent). Reverse mismatch was seen in 16 lesions (40 percent).  


Using statistical analysis and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), the researchers determined several factors that were predictors of mismatch, including: older patient age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.04, p<0.001), non-left anterior descending artery location (AOR 3, p<0.001), the absence of plaque rupture (AOR 2.6, p=0.004), short lesion length (AOR 1.03, p<0.001), a large minimal lumen cross-sectional area (AOR 2, p=0.001), a smaller plaque burden (AOR 1.05, p<0.001) and a greater minimal lumen diameter (AOR 1.09, p=0.040). 


The predictors of reverse mismatch included younger age (AOR 1.04, p=0.003), left anterior descending artery location (AOR 5.4, p<0.001), the presence of plaque rupture (AOR 3.2, p=0.011), smaller minimal lumen cross-sectional area (AOR 2.9, p<0.001) and larger plaque burden (AOR 1.03, p=0.027). 


According to the researchers, the results showed that discrepancies between the two tests were caused by clinical and lesion-specific factors that are often unable to be identified from coronary angiography alone. They concluded that coronary angiography could not accurately predict the functional results of FFR and that FFR should be included in the assessment process before cardiac specialists make decisions about revascularization.


For more information: www.acc.org


Related Content

European interventional cardiology market, drug-eluting stents, Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, Medtronic

Boston Scientific's Eluvia drug-eluting vascular stent system. Image courtesy of Boston Scientific.

Feature | Stents| July 31, 2015
According to a new report on the Europe market for interventional cardiology by iData Research, drug-eluting stents...
Hansen Medical, Magellan 10 French Robotic Catheter, FDA 510(k) clearance
Technology | Robotic Systems| July 29, 2015
The Magellan 10 French Robotic Catheter from Hansen Medical is indicated for use in the peripheral vasculature.
Products | Guidewires| July 28, 2015
The Safari2 Pre-Shaped Guidewire.
CSI, ViperWire Advance Peripheral Guide Wire with Flex Tip, Stealth, Diamondback

Diamondback 360 Peripheral OAS image courtesy of Cardiovascular Systems Inc.

Technology | Atherectomy Devices| July 22, 2015
Cardiovascular Systems Inc. announced that it has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for its...
The Medicines Company, bivalirudin, Angiomax, litigation, Hospira Inc.
News | Cath Lab| July 22, 2015
The Medicines Company announced the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has ruled against the company...
Boston Scientific, fully absorbable scaffold, FAST study, resorbable
Feature | Stents Bioresorbable| July 20, 2015
Boston Scientific has initiated a study of the company's first fully resorbable drug-eluting scaffold system. The Fully...
Veryan Medical, BioMimics 3D femoropopliteal stent, MIMICS-2 study, PAD
News | Stents Peripheral| July 17, 2015
Veryan Medical announced that the first subject has been enrolled in their MIMICS-2 study at Universitäts-Herzzentrum...
cardiac rehab after angioplasty, rehabilitation, ACC, Randal J. Thomas, referral
Feature | Cardiac Rehabilitation| July 17, 2015
Hospitals in the Midwest were more likely than others to refer patients for guideline-recommended cardiac...
ACC, health policy statement, heart team, cardiovascular health
Feature | Cardiovascular Surgery| July 17, 2015
Building teams that include advanced practice providers can help cardiovascular practices meet the challenges of modern...
Medtronic, Protege GPS self-expanding peripheral stent, FDA approval
Technology | July 16, 2015
Medtronic plc announced that its Protege GPS self-expanding peripheral stent system has received approval from the U.S...
Overlay Init