Feature | Heart Valve Technology | April 19, 2016| Michael J. Rinaldi, M.D., FACC, FSCAI

Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

Positive trial data continues to show TAVR is likely the future of aortic valve replacement

TAVR, Sapien 3, ACC.16

The continuation of positive clinical trial data for transcatheter aortic valve repair (TAVR), showing it is equal to or better than surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was the key news from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2016 meeting in April. The continued positive news also made many experts at ACC begin to question the long-term future of SAVR.

TAVR is currently approved for symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) in high-risk surgical patients and inoperable patients, as well as for failed bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) as an alternative to conventional SAVR. Volumes have increase significantly since its U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, TAVR now represents as much as 30 percent of the AVR market. This percentage is expected to grow rapidly if the devices are approved for intermediate-risk surgical patients.

 

Aug. 18, 2016 update — FDA Expands Sapien 3 TAVR Valve Indication to Intermediate Risk Patients

 

Key Late-breaking Trials at ACC.16 
There were three key late-breaking TAVR trials presented at ACC.  The biggest news was the result of the randomized PARTNER 2 trial of the TAVR vs. SAVR in moderate-risk patients. TAVR showed similar rates of death and disabling strokes after two years compared to open-heart surgery. This study was broken into two parts because the Edwards Lifesciences Sapien XT valve was replaced part way through the trial after the approval of the improved Sapien 3 value. The results for the Sapien XT portion of the trial (PARTNER 2A) were favorable for TAVR with no difference in stroke and death at two years follow up overall. It showed superior results for TAVR in the group treated using the femoral access route. Femoral access is the preferred access in 90 percent of patients. Additionally TAVR had lower rates of major bleeding, renal failure, and atrial fibrillation and had shorter length of stay compared to SAVR. 

The Sapien 3 portion of the PARTNER II trial showed the newer version of the device, which includes a skirt to reduce paravalvular leak, showed TAVR out-performed SAVR.

Watch a video interview with Vinod Thourani, M.D on the Sapien 3 beating surgery.

Watch a video interview with Chandan Devireddy, M.D. at ACC.16 explaining the drop in TAVR stroke rates. 

These results echoed the earlier results from the Medtronic CoreValve pivotal trial, which showed TAVR was superior to surgery. Three-year data from that trial presented at ACC.16 showed the divide between TAVR and SAVR continues to diverge in favor of TAVR. 

Watch a video interview with Michael Reardon, M.D., co-principal investigator for the CoreValve trial.

Two significant concerns for TAVR remain, including the perceived higher incidence where patients require a permanent pacemaker and residual paravalvular leak, which has been associated with higher mortality. In PARTNER 2, pacemaker requirements were not different from SAVR at two years. Additionally the rate of moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (AI), or aortic regurgitation, was only 3.7 percent. Mild AI, which was more common, was not associated with adverse outcomes. These results are reassuring for TAVR.

It is highly likely that TAVR indications for lower risk patients will be approved by the FDA and reimbursed by CMS in the coming years. While there has already been creep in the commercial market into the higher end of moderate risk this will greatly open access of TAVR to a greater number of patients. Essentially all but the lowest risk patients may now be treated with TAVR and the overall market for TAVR may exceed 50 percent. Additionally the PARTNER 3 (Edwards Sapien 3) and CoreValve Low Risk (Medtronic Evolute R) trials are now enrolling patients to begin evaluating TAVR vs. SAVR in low-risk patients. Within the next five years TAVR may exceed 70 percent of the overall AVR market.

 

A Paradigm Shift Technology
This is disruptive technology and market forces may change how and where heart surgery is delivered in the United States. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) volumes have declined in the U.S. as a result of improved coronary stent technology and changes in appropriate use guidelines for revascularization. Thus far, TAVR has primarily serves an unmet need for poor surgical candidates and SAVR volumes have remained stable. However, moving forward, conventional AVR volumes are poised to decline. CABG and SAVR represent the bulk of cardiac surgical volumes at most centers. Smaller and moderate sized programs at more regional hospitals may see overall surgical volumes decline to the point that they are no longer viable. The multidisciplinary nature of TAVR also may not be feasible at many smaller programs. 

Additionally with the uncoupling of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in cath labs from surgical backup throughout the United States, the economics of maintaining a surgical program in smaller centers may not make sense and programs may close. Just as coronary PCI has defused from large centers, we may see cardiac surgery in general consolidating in higher volume programs. Given the clear volume outcomes relationship with TAVR, this may be good for public health. While it is hard to predict the future of this consolidation, it is a possible, if not probable, scenario driven to a large degree by the rise of TAVR.

Watch video interview with John Carroll, M.D., regarding his ACC.16 presentation on TAVR outcomes related to center procedural volume.

Editor’s note: Michael J. Rinaldi, M.D., FACC, FSCAI, is the director of clinical research at Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute and a professor of medicine, CarolinasHealthCare System, Charlotte, N.C. He is an expert in TAVR, and has authored several studies that examine its applicability. 

Related Content

A Sapien 3 TAVR valve in position as seen under GE Assist guidance on angiography. Study Finds Sustained Benefit for TAVR vs. SAVR at One Year. #TCT2019 #TCT19

A Sapien 3 TAVR valve in position as seen under GE Assist guidance on angiography.

News | Heart Valve Technology | October 04, 2019
October 4, 2019 – A new analysis of the PARTNER 3 Trial data found a modest, but significant, improvement in one-year
Five-year results from the PARTNER 2A Trial found patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and intermediate surgical risk who underwent Sapien 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) had similar rates of death and disabling stroke compared to those who had surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, TAVR using a transthoracic approach had poorer outcomes compared to SAVR. #TCT2019
News | Heart Valve Technology | October 03, 2019
October 3, 2019 – Five-year results from the PARTNER 2A Trial found patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and int
The Boston Scientiofic Acurate Neo TAVR valve did not meet non-inferiority to the Sapien 3 valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis. #TAVR #TCT2019
News | Heart Valve Technology | October 02, 2019
October 2, 2019 – The first randomized trial to compare the safety and efficacy of the new Boston Scientific Acurate
The Portico FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) study found that 30-day safety and one-year effectiveness outcomes of a novel self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) system for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high or extreme-risk for surgery was noninferior to contemporary FDA-approved TAVR systems. #TAVR #TCT2019
News | Heart Valve Technology | October 02, 2019
October 2, 2019 – The Abbott Portico FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) study found that 30-day safety and on
Medtronic Launches Evolut Pro+ TAVR System
Technology | Heart Valve Technology | September 24, 2019
Medtronic announced U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and U.S. launch of the Evolut Pro+ transcatheter...
Reducing Secondary Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure Does Not Improve Two-year Outcomes
News | Heart Valve Technology | September 11, 2019
Percutaneous reduction of secondary mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure does not lower death and...
Abbott Launches Pivotal Trial of TriClip Tricuspid Valve Repair System
News | Heart Valve Technology | September 05, 2019
Abbott announced the launch of the company's TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of its...
An illustration of the BASILICA procedure showing the leaflet of the original bioprosthetic valve sliced open to allow coronary blood flow after implantation of a TAVR valve. The new TAVR valve can push the leaflets of the bioprosthetic valve upwards, blocking the coronary arteries. During the BASILICA procedure, a catheter directs an electrified guidewire through the base of the left aortic cusp into a snare in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). After snare retrieval, the mid-shaft of the guidewire

An illustration of the BASILICA procedure showing the leaflet of the original bioprosthetic valve sliced open to allow coronary blood flow after implantation of a TAVR valve. The new TAVR valve can push the leaflets of the bioprosthetic valve upwards, blocking the coronary arteries. During the BASILICA procedure, a catheter directs an electrified guidewire through the base of the left aortic cusp into a snare in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). After snare retrieval, the mid-shaft of the guidewire is electrified to lacerate the leaflet, and the the leaflet splays after TAVR permitting coronary flow.

Feature | Heart Valve Technology | August 27, 2019
A novel technique has proven successful in preventing coronary artery obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve r
Overlay Init