Feature | March 29, 2012

Trial Data Shows Superior Efficacy of Promus Element Compared to Xience V

The Boston Scientific Promus Element stent.

Abbott's Xience V stent. The stent is also sold by Boston Scientific under an agreement with Abbott as the Promus stent.

March 29, 2012 – Two-year follow-up data from the pivotal PLATINUM Workhorse trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of the Promus Element and Xience V everolimus-eluting coronary stents demonstrated superior efficacy of the Promus. The results were presented at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) Annual Scientific Session by Gregg W. Stone, M.D., professor of medicine and director of research and education at the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital. He was the global principal investigator of the trial. 

The outcomes reported at 12 months remained comparable at two years for the two stents.  However, an additional landmark analysis of outcomes from year one to year two demonstrated superior efficacy of the Promus Element during this 12-month period of follow-up.  

“The Promus Element platinum chromium stent continues to demonstrate excellent safety and effectiveness with low rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and repeat revascularization,” Stone said.  “These long-term results confirm that this device is an effective option for treating patients with coronary artery disease. Of particular note, a statistically significant reduction in recurrent ischemia requiring repeat revascularization procedures was present between the first and second year with the platinum chromium stent.  This finding is potentially important, but must be confirmed by longer-term follow-up.”

The trial reported a two-year target lesion failure (TLF) rate of 4.4 percent for the Promus Element, compared to 5.8 percent for the Xience V (p=0.32).  The Promus Element demonstrated numerically lower but not statistically different event rates than the Xience V in TLF components at two years, including cardiac death related to the target vessel (0.9 vs. 1.1 percent, respectively, p=0.98), myocardial infarction (MI) related to the target vessel (1.2 vs. 2.1 percent, p=0.28) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR, 2.4 vs. 4 percent, p=0.12).  Low rates of target vessel revascularization (TVR, 4.2 percent vs. 5.6 percent, p=0.3) and stent thrombosis (ARC definite/probable, 0.5 percent vs. 0.7 percent, p=0.99) were observed at two years for both stents.

In a landmark analysis of event rates from year one to year two, the Promus Element demonstrated statistically significant differences in TLF (1.2 vs. 3 percent, p=0.04, 56 percent relative reduction), and TLR (0.7 vs. 2.2 percent, p=0.02, 67 percent relative reduction) compared to the Xience V, showing superior efficacy of the Promus Element from 12 months to two years.

Trial results also confirmed a previously reported significant reduction in unplanned (bail-out or emergency) stenting with the Promus Element (5.9  vs. 9.8 percent, p=0.004), including a significantly lower rate of inadequate lesion coverage or “geographic miss” (1.4 vs. 3.4 percent, p=0.01).  Boston Scientific said these clinical observations reflect the results of comparative bench and animal studies, which demonstrated the enhanced visibility and deliverability of the Promus Element stent relative to the Xience V stent.

The prospective, multicenter, randomized PLATINUM Workhorse trial enrolled 1,530 patients with up to two de novo lesions at 132 clinical sites worldwide.  The trial met its primary endpoint of 12-month target lesion failure demonstrating non-inferiority for the platinum chromium Promus  Element compared to the cobalt chromium Xience V.  The comprehensive PLATINUM clinical program is evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Promus Element in six multi-center studies totaling more than 1,900 patients, including single-arm studies evaluating small vessels, long lesions, pharmacokinetics, and quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound data. 

Boston Scientific received CE mark approval for the Promus Element stent in 2009 and for the Promus Element Plus in 2011.  In the United States, the Promus Element Plus stent was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2011. 

For more information: www.bostonscientific.com

Related Content

UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham study, stroke prevention, non-valvular atrial fibrillation, NVAF
News | Atrial Fibrillation| October 25, 2016
A recent study from University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) researchers published in PLOS ONE compares different...
pediatric echocardiograms, cardiovascular ultrasound, therapy dog impact, animal-assisted therapy, Human Animal Bond Research Initiative, HABRI
News | Cardiovascular Ultrasound| October 25, 2016
The Human Animal Bond Research Initiative (HABRI) announced it has awarded a $44,000 grant to Duke University School of...
medicare bundled cardiac payments, CMS cardiology payments
Feature | Business| October 24, 2016 | By John W. Meyer, MPH, FACHE
(Editor’s note: This is the second part of a two-part series on the proposed Medicare five-year demonstration for
bioresorbable stents, bioabsorbable stents, visualizing the Absorb BVS, dissolving stent, disappearing stent on IVUS and OCT

A comparison of how the Abbott Absorb BVS appears with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) on the left, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the right. The stent is difficult to visualize and sizing is critical, so both modalities can help in bioresorbable stent measurements and to confirm stent apposition. Left image from the Volcano IVUS system and the right image from St. Jude Medical's OCT system


Feature | Stents Bioresorbable| October 20, 2016 | Dave Fornell
There has been a lot of interest in the interventional community regarding the Abbott Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular S
Avinger, Pantheris atherectomy catheter, OCT, Lumivascular technology, expanded FDA indication, diagnostic imaging device
News | Atherectomy Devices| October 20, 2016
Avinger Inc. recently announced that the company has received expanded indications from the U.S. Food and Drug...
St. Jude Medical, ADO II AS trial, congenital heart disease, PDA, Amplatzer Duct Occluder II AS
News | Congenital Heart| October 19, 2016
St. Jude Medical Inc. announced the launch of the ADO II AS (AMPLATZER Duct Occluder II Additional Sizes) pediatric...
recall, alligator retrieval device, X-Celerator hydrophilic guidewire, UltraFlow flow directed micro catheters, Marathon flow directed micro catheters
News | Cath Lab| October 18, 2016
Medtronic plc announced last week that it has notified customers of a voluntary recall of certain lots of its Pipeline...
Inventory management, Cardinal, RFID inventory tracking, cath lab inventory
Sponsored Content | Whitepapers | Inventory Management| October 18, 2016
As healthcare moves into the era of bundled payments, providers need to be especially focused on ensuring delivery of
angioseal, angio-seal, terumo, St. Jude, vascular closure devices
News | Vascular Closure Devices| October 18, 2016
October 18, 2016 — Abbott and St. Jude Medical Inc.
Overlay Init