Feature | March 29, 2012

Trial Data Shows Superior Efficacy of Promus Element Compared to Xience V

The Boston Scientific Promus Element stent.

Abbott's Xience V stent. The stent is also sold by Boston Scientific under an agreement with Abbott as the Promus stent.

March 29, 2012 – Two-year follow-up data from the pivotal PLATINUM Workhorse trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of the Promus Element and Xience V everolimus-eluting coronary stents demonstrated superior efficacy of the Promus. The results were presented at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) Annual Scientific Session by Gregg W. Stone, M.D., professor of medicine and director of research and education at the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital. He was the global principal investigator of the trial. 

The outcomes reported at 12 months remained comparable at two years for the two stents.  However, an additional landmark analysis of outcomes from year one to year two demonstrated superior efficacy of the Promus Element during this 12-month period of follow-up.  

“The Promus Element platinum chromium stent continues to demonstrate excellent safety and effectiveness with low rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and repeat revascularization,” Stone said.  “These long-term results confirm that this device is an effective option for treating patients with coronary artery disease. Of particular note, a statistically significant reduction in recurrent ischemia requiring repeat revascularization procedures was present between the first and second year with the platinum chromium stent.  This finding is potentially important, but must be confirmed by longer-term follow-up.”

The trial reported a two-year target lesion failure (TLF) rate of 4.4 percent for the Promus Element, compared to 5.8 percent for the Xience V (p=0.32).  The Promus Element demonstrated numerically lower but not statistically different event rates than the Xience V in TLF components at two years, including cardiac death related to the target vessel (0.9 vs. 1.1 percent, respectively, p=0.98), myocardial infarction (MI) related to the target vessel (1.2 vs. 2.1 percent, p=0.28) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR, 2.4 vs. 4 percent, p=0.12).  Low rates of target vessel revascularization (TVR, 4.2 percent vs. 5.6 percent, p=0.3) and stent thrombosis (ARC definite/probable, 0.5 percent vs. 0.7 percent, p=0.99) were observed at two years for both stents.

In a landmark analysis of event rates from year one to year two, the Promus Element demonstrated statistically significant differences in TLF (1.2 vs. 3 percent, p=0.04, 56 percent relative reduction), and TLR (0.7 vs. 2.2 percent, p=0.02, 67 percent relative reduction) compared to the Xience V, showing superior efficacy of the Promus Element from 12 months to two years.

Trial results also confirmed a previously reported significant reduction in unplanned (bail-out or emergency) stenting with the Promus Element (5.9  vs. 9.8 percent, p=0.004), including a significantly lower rate of inadequate lesion coverage or “geographic miss” (1.4 vs. 3.4 percent, p=0.01).  Boston Scientific said these clinical observations reflect the results of comparative bench and animal studies, which demonstrated the enhanced visibility and deliverability of the Promus Element stent relative to the Xience V stent.

The prospective, multicenter, randomized PLATINUM Workhorse trial enrolled 1,530 patients with up to two de novo lesions at 132 clinical sites worldwide.  The trial met its primary endpoint of 12-month target lesion failure demonstrating non-inferiority for the platinum chromium Promus  Element compared to the cobalt chromium Xience V.  The comprehensive PLATINUM clinical program is evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Promus Element in six multi-center studies totaling more than 1,900 patients, including single-arm studies evaluating small vessels, long lesions, pharmacokinetics, and quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound data. 

Boston Scientific received CE mark approval for the Promus Element stent in 2009 and for the Promus Element Plus in 2011.  In the United States, the Promus Element Plus stent was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2011. 

For more information: www.bostonscientific.com

Related Content

smartphones, hospital tranfers, heart attack patients, JACC study, South Korea
News | Mobile Devices| September 23, 2016
Smartphone communication among medical teams at different hospitals can significantly reduce the time it takes for...
Robert M. Califf, FDA commissioner, future of cardiovascular medicine, JACC column
News | Business| September 23, 2016
Technology advances coupled with increased use of social media and personal devices could offer new possibilities for...
Medtronic, In.Pact Admiral drug-coated balloon, trial data, VIVA
News | Drug-Eluting Balloons| September 22, 2016
New data presented at the Vascular Interventional Advances (VIVA) conference demonstrated the durability, consistency...
4Tech, TriCinch TTVR, transcather tricuspid valve repair device, first implant
News | Heart Valve Technology| September 22, 2016
4Tech Inc. announced that its TriCinch device has been used in the world’s first-ever successful transcatheter...
Transesophageal Echo, TEE. Interventional echocardiography, interventional echo, Philips, CX50

Transesophageal echo (TEE) has become an essential part of the new transcatheter structrual heart therapies, giving rise to a new sub-speciality of interventional echocardiography.  

Feature | Cath Lab Navigation Aids| September 21, 2016 | Dave Fornell
The rapid growth of transcatheter structural heart procedures and the need for increased use of echocardiography as a
Sponsored Content | Videos | Inventory Management| September 21, 2016
With bundled payments putting increased pressure on hospitals to manage supply costs while providing quality patient
Claret Medical, Sentinal CPS, cerebral protection system, FDA marketing application, TAVR, embolic protection
News | Embolic Protection Devices| September 20, 2016
Claret Medical announced its filing of a marketing application with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for...
Medtronic, CRT, cardiac resynchroniazation therapy devices, heart failure, medication adherence, retrospective analysis, HFSA 2016
News | Heart Failure| September 20, 2016
Medtronic plc announced the results of an analysis that reveals patients increasingly adhere to heart failure...
Teleflex, AVA 2016 Congress, Association for Vascular Access
News | Vascular Access| September 20, 2016
September 20, 2016 — Teleflex Inc.
Edwards sapien, intermediate risk patients, CE mark
News | Heart Valve Technology| September 20, 2016
September 19, 2016 — Edwards Lifesciences received European CE mark to expand use of the Edwards Sapien 3 transcathet
Overlay Init