Feature | September 24, 2012

Updated Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities Issued by ACC, AHA, HRS

Experts recommend expanded use of cardiac resynchronization therapy in some patients, offer guidance on device follow-up

September 24, 2012 — Surgically inserted cardiac devices play an important role in treating certain heart problems. In fact, an estimated 400,000 devices, including pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators, are implanted each year in the United States. Still, selecting patients in whom these devices will provide the most benefit can be challenging.

To help clinicians keep pace with the emerging clinical research and advances related to device-based therapies, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) Foundation, American Heart Association (AHA) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) have jointly released updated guidelines for the use of devices in treating heart rhythm disorders. Chief among the updates are expanded indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), a procedure that is used to better synchronize or coordinate the rhythm of the heart, thereby improving the way the heart functions. The revised guidelines reflect new evidence that patients with mild heart failure or NYHA class II should also be considered for CRT based on what their electrocardiogram (ECG) looks like.

“These are patients who had previously been excluded from receiving CRT, but studies have shown they can benefit from this procedure. It can really improve their lives by delaying or avoiding worsening heart failure,” said Cynthia M. Tracy, M.D., George Washington University, chair of the writing group.

Within the guidelines, the writing group clarifies and provides recommendations about which patients are most likely to benefit from CRT. “There is growing evidence that patients with the widest, most abnormal looking ECG potentially benefit most compared to patients whose ECG are less abnormal,” said Tracy. In particular, patients with wide left bundle-branch block complexes as seen on their ECG seem to do well with CRT.

“It’s very difficult on a case-by-case basis to assess a patient’s likelihood of success,” said Tracy. “Implanting a device is relatively straight forward, but it’s not completely without potential for complication, and there are a lot of management issues that come up. You want to be sure you are doing the right thing by your patient and choosing the right device for the right patient.”

By pulling together and examining the best evidence to date, she says the guidelines can provide physicians with a clear indication for who is most likely to benefit from device-based therapies. In addition, other modifications have been made to help physicians decide which patients with atrial fibrillation might benefit from CRT. In particular, some patients with weak hearts and irregular, slow heart rhythms can benefit from CRT. The committee also summarized the minimum frequency of in-person and remote monitoring of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

The original guidelines for device therapy were issued in 2008 and became the first to combine indications for all cardiac implantable electronic devices. The writing group reviewed these earlier recommendations and, other than the new and modified recommendations for CRT, they remain unchanged and current policy for the ACCF and AHA. “The updated guidelines extend and clarify current best practices and will continue to evolve as technology advances,” Tracy said.

The writing group included experts in device therapy, cardiovascular care, internal medicine, cardiovascular surgery, and pediatric and adult electrophysiology. The guidelines were also developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Heart Failure Society of America and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. A related appropriateness use document is currently in development that will help to further interpret the best science and apply it to various clinical scenarios.

The guidelines will be published in the Journal of the American College of CardiologyCirculation: Journal of the American Heart Association; and the Heart Rhythm Journal.

For more information: www.cardiosource.org/ACC, www.heart.org, www.hrsonline.org

Related Content

ICDs, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, University of Alabama at Birmingham study, Circulation
News | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD)| January 18, 2017
A new study published in Circulation has found there is a 23 percent risk in reduction of all-cause mortality in non-...
LindaCare, expansion, remote patient monitoring, CIEDs, cardiac implantable electronic devices, United States
News | Remote Monitoring| January 18, 2017
LindaCare announced that it will open a new customer support facility in Connecticut to support growing interest in...
stress, brain activity, cardiovascular risk, PET-CT, MGH, ISSMS, The Lancet study
News | Cardiac Diagnostics| January 18, 2017
A study led by Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISSMS) investigators...
ICDs, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, survival rate, elderly patients, JACC study
News | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD)| January 17, 2017
Of patients over age 65 who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) after surviving sudden cardiac...
University of Utah, Frank Sachse, heart failure, LVAD implantation, left ventricular assist device, biomarker, t-system

Two patients may seem equally sick based upon clinical measures, but differences in their heart physiology could predict who has the potential to recover from heart failure. A study carried out by scientists at the University of Utah finds that patients whose hearts have flattened t-tubules have a decreased chance of showing signs of recovery after implanting a mechanical heart pump. Ordinarily, t-tubules in the heart are long, thin, and rounded. Image courtesy of Frank Sachse.

News | Cardiac Diagnostics| January 17, 2017
Investigators at the University of Utah have identified distinct differences in the hearts of advanced heart failure...
Synergy stent, abluminal polymer DES, bioresorbable polymer DES, bioresorbable polymer metallic stent

The Synergy stent is the first FDA cleared drug-eluting stent to use a bioresorbable polymer drug carrier. When the polymer dissolves after about four months, the devices become a bare metal stent. The technology is supposed to reduce the rate of late stent thrombosis due to vessel inflammation caused by durable polymers.

Feature | Stents Bioresorbable| January 17, 2017 | Dave Fornell
One of the big advancements in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology has been the development of bioresorbable polymers
St. Jude Medical, Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder, observational study, TCT 2016
News | Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Occluders| November 03, 2016
St. Jude Medical Inc. presented favorable results from the largest observational study to date of the company’s...
Medtronic, CoreValve Evolut R TAVR system, U.S. IDE Study, TCT 2016
News | Heart Valve Technology| November 03, 2016
Medtronic plc unveiled new clinical data showing that patients treated with the self-expanding CoreValve Evolut R...
open-heart surgery, PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention, NOBLE trial, left main coronary artery disease, LMCAD, TCT 2016
News | Cardiovascular Surgery| November 03, 2016
Coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery is the standard treatment for revascularization in patients with left main...
News | Drug-Eluting Balloons| November 03, 2016
The Spectranetics Corp. announced that it has submitted to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) its Pre-Market...
Overlay Init