Feature | June 24, 2008| Dave Fornell

WEB EXCLUSIVE - Analyzing the Progress, Success of EMR Implementation

HIMSS has a multi-tier system to measure the level of a hospital's technology sophistication.

The implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) to convert from a paper chart record system to a high-tech paperless system can take a large investment of time and money and years to complete. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Analytics measures the progress of a hospital’s using a seven-stage scale it calls the EMR adoption model.

Stage one includes hospitals that have installed electronic EMR systems in its primary ancillary departments the rest of the hospital relies on – the laboratory, pharmacy and radiology departments.

Stage two includes connecting major ancillary clinical systems to feed data to clinical data repository (CDR) that provides physician access for retrieving and reviewing results.

Stage three includes clinical documentation installed (e.g. vital signs, flow sheets, nursing notes, care plan charting, and/or the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) system are scored with extra points and are implemented and integrated with the CDR for at least one service in the hospital. The first level of clinician decision support is implemented to conduct error checking with order entry (such as drug/drug, drug/food, drug/lab, conflict checking normally found in the pharmacy). There is also some level of medical image access from picture archive and communication systems (PACS).

Stage four includes implementing computerized practitioner/physician order entry (CPOE) for use by any clinician and second-level clinical decision support related to evidence-based medicine protocols.

Stage five includes creating a closed loop medication administration environment that is fully implemented in at least one patient care service area. The eMAR and bar coding or other auto-identification technology, such as radio frequency identification (RFID), are implemented and integrated with CPOE and pharmacy to maximize point-of-care patient safety.

Stage six includes implementing full physician documentation/charting using structured templates for at least one patient care service area. A full complement of radiology PACS systems is implemented with all images, both digital and film-based, available to physicians via an intranet or secure network.

Stage seven is the final goal of any EMR implementation, which is a paperless EMR environment where clinical information can be readily shared via continuity of care electronic transactions with all entities within health information exchange networks (including other hospitals, ambulatory clinics, sub-acute environments, employers, payers and patients). Also at this stage, HCOs use data warehousing and mining technologies to capture and analyze care data, and improve care protocols via decision support.

Even at the the lower adoption stages below stage four, Mike Davis, executive vice president of HIMSS Analytics, said clinicians are still getting more information than they had available using paper charts. This is because the current state of the patient is automatically dumped into the patient record directly from monitoring devices, faster transcription times, nursing notes. lab results, radiology and other electronic sources. He said this extra information helps lead to better clinical decisions. In addition, he said immediate access to the EMR from any computer helps increase staff efficiencies.

At stages four and five, Davis said hospitals integrate CPOE systems, bar-code devices and medication management systems with the patient EMR and use the five rights for medication management.

“That’s where you really see big increases in patient safety,” Davis said. “They showed incredible improvements in things like on-time medication management. They are also pretty much eliminating medication errors.”

However, only about 2 percent of U.S. hospitals are at stage five, and only about 1 percent of hospitals are at stage six. For that reason, Davis said it is difficult to gage national trends in terms of patient safety increases with such a small number of hospitals. However, he said the statistics from those hospitals that are at levels five and six show significant patient safety statistics. Davis said these hospitals definitely saw drops in the number medication errors and incidence of hospital-acquired infections.

To get from stage one to stage six usually takes a hospital about seven years to achieve, because Davis said each new addition of technology must be integrated into hospital workflows, the staff must be trained, and it takes time to work the glitches out of the system.

In most cases, hospitals are finding mistakes with bar-code and CPOE systems they never caught before. Davis said this is a good example of the fact it is difficult to gage the true return on investment for implementing EHR technology, especially bar-code systems and CPOE, because errors are not always recognized or reported before these systems are used. For this reason the true extent of errors is not really known. In any case, he said these systems have proven very useful at decreasing overall errors and increasing patient safety.

New technology adoption at stage five and six hospitals also helped deceased transcription times from eight to 12 hours down to less than an hour, which aids patient care, David said.

“When you have data coming back that quickly you can make much better decisions,” David said.

Adoption of EHRs and supporting technologies is being driven primarily because hospitals what to have better patient outcomes. Better outcomes also act as a marketing advantage to help draw more patients as healthcare becomes more consumer driver.

“If I had to go to a hospital, I want to go to one with these systems in place,” Davis said.

Better outcomes and better technology to help improve workflows also helps attract good clinicians to these hospitals, he said. In the future, pay-for-performance programs and non-reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid for hospital errors or hospital–acquired conditions or infections will make the EMRs and their goal of increasing patient safety even more important.

“EMRs will be a requirement for hospitals to compete in the future,” Davis said.

For more information: www.himssanalytics.org

Related Content

electronic health records, EHR, warfarin therapy management, University of Missouri Health Care, blood thinner
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| January 17, 2017
Warfarin is a commonly prescribed blood thinner used to prevent harmful blood clots. However, the drug requires...
AMA, American Medical Association study, EMRs, electronic medical records, physician burnout
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR)| September 07, 2016
Technological and administrative obstacles are significantly cutting into available time for physicians to engage with...
HIE, health information exchanges, participation strategy, Binghamton University
News | Information Technology| August 18, 2016
The U.S. healthcare industry has failed to create and sustain an efficient network for storing and sharing patient...
IBISWorld, electronic medical records, EMR software, price, market report

Image courtesy of IBISWorld

News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR)| June 07, 2016
According to market research firm IBISWorld, the average price of electronic medical record (EMR) software is forecast...
ONC, survey, electronic health records, adoption, 2015
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR)| June 03, 2016
According to data from a new survey, nearly all of the nation’s hospitals have adopted certified electronic health...
CMS, Meaningful Use replacement, Meaningful Outcomes, JPM16
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR)| January 15, 2016
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced Monday that it will be ending the Meaningful Use program...
News | Information Technology| December 29, 2015
December 29, 2015 — The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) applauded the U.S.
PICOM, Scimage, Cardiac PACS, CVIS

ScImage's PICOM system is an example of a CVIS that unifies the IT needs of several cardiovascular service lines into a single cardiology department reporting and image management system. This includes cardiac imaging, echo, ECG management and cath lab reporting. 

Feature | Cardiac PACS| October 08, 2015 | Dave Fornell
Cardiovascular information systems (CVIS or cardiac PACS) have undergone a transformation over the past few years to
CMS, Stage 3 Meaningful Use final rule, ONC, healthcare IT, electronic health records, EHR
Feature | Information Technology| October 07, 2015
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final version of Stage 3 Meaningful Use (MU)...

Big data from regional health exchanges can help identify patients who are at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease and stroke based on blood pressure readings and trends from their office visits over time that arestored in the electronic health records. This information can be used to target these patients with more followups, education and more intensive prevention programs. 

Feature | Population Health| September 22, 2015 | Jeff Zagoudis and Dave Fornell
As healthcare converts to an entirely electronic health record (EHR)-based system, it opens up new opportunities to m
Overlay Init