Feature | May 18, 2011 | Adhir Shroff, M.D., MPH

Review of the RIVAL Trial

Transradial has lower vascular complication, bleeding rates than transfemoral access

Figure 1: Access site and bleeding outcomes from the RIVAL trial.

The results of the highly anticipated RIVAL (RadIal Vs. femorAL access for coronary intervention)[1,2] trial were presented April 4 at the American College of Cardiology’s 2011 Scientific Session in New Orleans. The basis of the trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the transradial approach as compared to the femoral approach in patients being treated with an invasive strategy for an acute coronary syndroThe results of the highly anticipated RIVAL (RadIal Vs. femorAL access for coronary intervention)[1,2] trial were presented April 4 at the American College of Cardiology’s 2011 Scientific Session in New Orleans.  The basis of the trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the transradial approach as compared to the femoral approach in patients being treated with an invasive strategy for an acute coronary syndrome.


Presenting the results was Sanjit Jolly, M.D., M.Sc., assistant professor of medicine at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, who explained the radial approach affords a decrease in bleeding and vascular complications.  Several reports have linked bleeding events following coronary intervention to an increased risk of death. Prior to this study, there have been only retrospective studies or pooled analyses that have suggested the radial approach as superior to femoral artery access.


Patients with an acute coronary syndrome were randomized to either the transradial or transfemoral approach. Anticoagulation strategy was left to the discretion of the operator. More than 7,000 patients were included in this multicenter study. The primary endpoints included the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or non-coronary artery bypass graft related major bleeding within 30 days.


The key findings of the study included:
• Primary outcome was equivalent between radial and femoral groups (3.7 vs. 4 percent, p=0.50)
• Less vascular access site complications with radial compared to femoral access (p<0.0001) (Figure 1)
• Access site crossover was higher in the radial group (7.6 vs. 2 percent, p<0.0001)
• All access site major bleeds in the radial group occurred in those patients who crossed over to the femoral group
• High-volume radial centers had a benefit for the primary outcome compared with femoral access group (p=0.021)
• Patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) benefited from transradial access for the composite endpoint of death, heart attack and stroke (p=0.011) and death alone (p=0.001) (Figure 2)


In summary, the authors concluded there was no difference in rates of composite death, myocardial infarction, stroke or major bleeding between access strategies, but radial access decreased major vascular complications. Expertise with the transradial technique and procedure volume may be linked to the effectiveness of this approach.

References:
1.    Jolly SS, Niemelä K, Xavier D, et al. “Design and rationale of the RadIal Vs. femorAL access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: A randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes.” American Heart Journal 2011, 161:254-60.


2.    Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Kari Niemelä DX, Petr Widimsky, Andrzej Budaj, Matti Niemelä, Vicent Valentin, Basil S Lewis,, Alvaro Avezum PGS, Sunil V Rao, Peggy Gao, Rizwan Afzal, Campbell D Joyner, Susan Chrolavicius, Shamir R Mehta, for the group. “Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.” Lancet 2011.

3.    Jolly SS. “A randomized comparison of RadIal Vs. femorAL access for coronary intervention in ACS (RIVAL).” American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions, New Orleans, 2011.


Related Content

European interventional cardiology market, drug-eluting stents, Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, Medtronic

Boston Scientific's Eluvia drug-eluting vascular stent system. Image courtesy of Boston Scientific.

Feature | Stents| July 31, 2015
According to a new report on the Europe market for interventional cardiology by iData Research, drug-eluting stents...
Navidea, Mass General, Tc99m-tilmanocept, vulnerable plaque, cardiovascular disease, Harvard
News | Radiopharmaceuticals and Tracers| July 30, 2015
Navidea Biopharmaceuticals Inc. announced plans to move forward with a joint study of the ability of Tc99m-tilmanocept...
Hansen Medical, Magellan 10 French Robotic Catheter, FDA 510(k) clearance
Technology | Robotic Systems| July 29, 2015
The Magellan 10 French Robotic Catheter from Hansen Medical is indicated for use in the peripheral vasculature.
MSCs, stem cells, end-stageheart failure, retrograde, coronary sinus,
News | Stem Cell Therapies| July 29, 2015
A new clinical trial to test how a high dose of stem cells delivered via a method called retrograde coronary sinus...
Products | Guidewires| July 28, 2015
The Safari2 Pre-Shaped Guidewire.
CSI, ViperWire Advance Peripheral Guide Wire with Flex Tip, Stealth, Diamondback

Diamondback 360 Peripheral OAS image courtesy of Cardiovascular Systems Inc.

Technology | Atherectomy Devices| July 22, 2015
Cardiovascular Systems Inc. announced that it has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for its...
heart failure, Adaptive CRT trial, AdaptivCRT algorithm, readmissions
News | Heart Failure| July 22, 2015
Heart failure patients had a significantly lower chance of being readmitted within 30 days of discharge when treated...
Direct Flow Medical, Transcatheter Aortic Valve System, SALUS Trial, FDA
News | Heart Valve Repair| July 22, 2015
Direct Flow Medical Inc. received Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) approval from the U.S. Food and Drug...
The Medicines Company, bivalirudin, Angiomax, litigation, Hospira Inc.
News | Cath Lab| July 22, 2015
The Medicines Company announced the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has ruled against the company...
Xarelto, anticoagulant protocol, discharge, outcomes, DVT, PE
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| July 21, 2015
Two companion papers published in Academic Emergency Medicine  address the question of when it is appropriate to...
Overlay Init