Feature | March 06, 2013| Helen Kuhl

Implementation of Clinical Decision Support in the Real World

A decade of CDS experience at Brigham and Women’s

Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston conducted a pilot study of a Web-enabled computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system (another Stage 2 requirement) with embedded imaging decision support. In an effort to reduce the inappropriate use of medical imaging and improve quality of care, it was phased into clinical use between 2000 and 2010 across outpatient, emergency and inpatient departments. The study, published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology in February 2012, showed significant increases in meaningful use for electronically created studies (from 0.4 percent to 61.9 percent) and for electronically signed studies (from 0.4 percent to 92.2 percent) and the adoption of CPOE (from 0.5 percent to 94.6 percent).

A total of 4.1 million imaging studies were performed during the study period. The use of electronically created studies was greatest in the emergency department and inpatient settings. Meaningful use varied across specialties; surgical subspecialties had the lowest rates of electronically created studies.

“Our study shows that an imaging CPOE system with embedded decision support that is integrated into the healthcare enterprise IT infrastructure and the relevant electronic medical record platform and optimized within the clinicians’ workflow can be successfully and broadly accepted clinically,” said Ivan K. Ip, M.D., MPH, lead author of the study.   

CDS was not wholeheartily embraced by everyone at the hospital, said Ramin Khorasani, M.D., Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Radiology, when he spoke about the software at SIIM 2012 in June. He said it took time to get people to buy in to decision support and accountability, explaining people did not want to change or do something new, especially when it’s a significant change for a radiology practice. He offered advice to hospitals looking at adopting CDS.

Khorasani said the quality of the evidence used by the CDS matters. He said Brigham & Women’s gives scores to the evidence (it does not matter who published it) to say how valuable it is, before they accept it and put it into the system. 

There are instances when there is evidence both for and against something, which can lead to confusion if entered both ways into a CDS system. “When something isn’t clear, we don’t put it in,” Khorasani said. “Then we turn to local best practices. We don’t put something in just because it’s published by one group or another. We leave controversial stuff aside.”

The system uses evidence-based guidelines from the various societies, which are updated continuously to keep the CDS current. The lag time from publication to updates in the system is between four to six weeks. 

Effective decision support also must be accompanied by accountability. Brigham & Women’s now requires physicians to sign all orders electronically.

“We are going to embarrass you, and make you think twice about ordering an exam,” Khorasani said. 

Brigham and  Women’s CDS tool is not something on the side, it’s part of the medical record, he said. Part of the reason for this is to record everything and make physicians accountable and guarantee they do not ignore clinical evidence. 

Khorasani also said a broad collaboration is needed, from those in the front lines using the system, up through to the upper management. “Adoption of evidence-based imaging health information  technology needs leadership, too. You must have buy-in and encouragement from the top in order for it to succeed,” he explained. 

Finally, he advised using the data collected by the system to measure everything.  This will help quantify successes and also identify issues that need to be addressed.   

Related Content

Digital Health Company Murj Announces $4.5 Million in Financing
News | Implantable Cardiac Monitor (ICM)| April 19, 2017
Murj Inc., a digital health company that helps manage implantable cardiac device data, announced more than $4.5 million...
Siemens Healthineers Supports Population Health Management With Planned Acquisition of Medicalis
News | Clinical Decision Support| April 19, 2017
Siemens Healthineers plans to expand its Population Health Management (PHM) portfolio with the acquisition of Medicalis...

Physicians will need to use a CMS-certified appropriate use criteria (AUC) clinical decision support software that documents the appropriateness of an imaging order to receive full reimbursement for Medicare patients starting Jan. 1, 2018.

Feature | Cardiac Imaging| April 18, 2017 | Dave Fornell
As part of U.S. healthcare reform efforts, starting Jan.
Sponsored Content | Videos | Analytics Software| April 13, 2017
The shift to value-based payment models requires focused attention on quality and cost.
ACR Appropriateness Criteria, update, new topics, medical imaging, AUC, American College of Radiology
News | Clinical Decision Support| April 03, 2017
The newest release of American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria covers 230 topics with more than 1,...
ECRI Institute, top 10 patient safety concerns, 2017 report, information technology, healthcare
News | Information Technology| March 24, 2017
Safe implementation of new technologies and therapies accompany classic patient safety challenges on ECRI Institute's “...
iFR, iFR vs. FFR, ACC late breaking trial, iFR-SWEDEHEART, DEFINE-FLAIR, Justin E. Davies,

Matthias Götberg, principal investigator for the iFR-SWEDEHEART study, and Justin E. Davies, lead investigator for the DEFINE-FLAIR trial, share key points of their study with DAIC editor Dave Fornell at ACC.17. The trials showed iFR is equal in outcomes to FFR in assessing coronary lesions. 

Feature | FFR Catheters| March 20, 2017
March 20, 2017 — For patients experiencing angina (chest pain) or a heart attack, instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)
Sponsored Content | Videos | Analytics Software| March 15, 2017
Pam Rush, RN, MS, clinical program director, cardiovascular service line, and Craig Strauss, M.D., MPH, medical direc
AI, deep learning, artificial intelligence, medical imaging, cardiology, echo AI, clinical decision support, echocardiography

An example of artificial intelligence from the start-up company Viz. The image shows how the AI software automatically reviews an echocardiogram, completes an automated left ventricular ejection fraction quantification and then presents the data side by side with the original cardiology report. The goal of the software is to augment clinicians and cardiologists by helping them speed workflow, act as a second set of eyes and aid clinical decision support.

Feature | Artificial Intelligence| March 10, 2017 | Dave Fornell
Artificial intelligence (AI) has captured the imagination and attention of doctors over the past couple years as seve
Sponsored Content | Videos | HIMSS| March 10, 2017
ITN Editor Dave Fornell takes a tour of some of the most innovative new technology that was displayed on the expo flo
Overlay Init