Feature | Atrial Fibrillation | November 02, 2017

Mixed Results in PREVAIL Trial Comparing Five-Year Data for LAA Closure Compared to Warfarin

Study looked at patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and included a combined meta-analysis with PROTECT AF at TCT 2017 

The Watchman LAA occluder PREVAIL Trial 5-year results were presented at the 2017 TCT meeting.

November 2, 2017 – Five-year results from the PREVAIL Trial comparing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Boston Scientific Watchman device to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation found that the first composite co-primary endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism (SE), or cardiovascular/unexplained death did not achieve noninferiority. However, the second co-primary endpoint of post-procedure ischemic stroke/SE did achieve noninferiority. When combined with the five-year outcomes of the PROTECT AF trial a meta-analysis demonstrated that LAAC provides stroke prevention comparable to warfarin, with additional reductions in major bleeding, particularly hemorrhagic stroke and mortality.

Findings were reported at the 2017 Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific symposium and published simultaneously in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

“Beyond PROTECT AF, PREVAIL is the only other completed randomized clinical trial comparing any LAAC device with an oral anticoagulant,” said Saibal Kar, M.D., director of cardiovascular intervention center research at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. “Based on the combined results of these two studies, left atrial appendage closure is a reasonable strategy for stroke prophylaxis for patients who are poor candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation.”

Because of identical efficacy endpoint definitions in both the PROTECT AF and PREVAIL trials, and the near-identical eligibility criteria, data from both trials were pooled for a patient-level meta-analysis. The PROTECT AF and PREVAIL trials enrolled 707 and 407 patients, respectively, who were randomized 2:1 to the LAAC and warfarin arms. In both trials, patients were followed for the protocol-defined maximum time period of five years, ending in 2013 and 2017. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both studies.

For the PREVAIL trial, all endpoints required the inclusion of the PROTECT AF informative prior, resulting in a calculated 18-month rate of the first coprimary endpoint (composite of stroke, systemic embolism (SE), or cardiovascular/unexplained death) of 0.066 with LAAC versus 0.051 for warfarin, yielding a mean 18-month rate ratio of 1.33 (95% credible interval: 0.78 to 2.13). It did not achieve noninferiority (posterior probability for noninferiority = 88.4%). However, the second coprimary endpoint of post-procedure ischemic stroke/SE did achieve noninferiority (posterior probability for noninferiority = 97.5%). The calculated 18-month rate for the second coprimary efficacy endpoint was 0.0255 in the LAAC group versus 0.0135 in the warfarin group (rate difference 0.0120; 95% credible interval: -0.0036 to 0.0275) At five years, the warfarin arm maintained an unexpectedly low ischemic stroke rate (0.73%), as compared with other studies examining such a regimen.

In the meta-analysis of PROTECT AF and PREVAIL with five-year follow-up, the composite endpoint was similar between groups (HR: 0.820; P=0.27), as were all-stroke/SE (HR: 0.961; P= 0.87). The ischemic stroke/SE rate was numerically higher with LAAC, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (HR: 1.71; P=0.080). However, differences in hemorrhagic stroke, disabling/fatal stroke, cardiovascular/unexplained death, all-cause death, and post-procedure bleeding favored LAAC (HR: 0.20; P=0.0022; HR: 0.45; P=0.03; HR: 0.59; P=0.027; HR: 0.73; P=0.035; HR: 0.48; P=0.0003, respectively). Therefore, the meta-analysis demonstrates comparable efficacy and stroke rates with no significant difference across subgroups, no significant differences in ischemic stroke rates versus warfarin, and significant, superior reductions in disabling strokes, non-procedural bleeding, and mortality.

The PREVAIL trial was funded by Boston Scientific. Kar reported that he received research grants from and served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific; has served as a member of the advisory board for left atrial appendage closure; is the national principal investigator of the Continuous Access Registries (CAP & CAP2); and has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific.

For more information: www.crf.org

 

Related Content

TCT 2017 Late-breaking Clinical Trial Presentations

Related Content

News | Atrial Fibrillation

September 28, 2021 — Image-guided fibrosis ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) does not improve ...

Home September 28, 2021
Home
News | Atrial Fibrillation

September 13, 2021 — Ablation plus cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is superior to pharmacological rate control ...

Home September 13, 2021
Home
News | Atrial Fibrillation

September 8, 2021 — Continuous heart rhythm monitoring – with anticoagulation if atrial fibrillation is detected – does ...

Home September 08, 2021
Home
News | Atrial Fibrillation

August 9, 2021 — Adagio Medical Inc., a provider of catheter ablation technologies for atrial fibrillation (AF) and ...

Home August 09, 2021
Home
News | Atrial Fibrillation

June 23, 2021 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded approval for Medtronic's Arctic Front Family of ...

Home June 23, 2021
Home
News | Atrial Fibrillation

April 19, 2021 — National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) has awarded a grant for $462,689 to Rhythm ...

Home April 19, 2021
Home
News | Atrial Fibrillation

March 3, 2021 — Farapulse Inc. announced the first patients were treated in the ADVENT Trial, a U.S. Food and Drug ...

Home March 03, 2021
Home
News | Atrial Fibrillation

January 29, 2021 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared Medtronic's DiamondTemp Ablation (DTA) system ...

Home January 29, 2021
Home
Feature | Atrial Fibrillation | By John D. Day, M.D., T. Jared Bunch, M.D., and Matthew D. LaPlante

In our most challenging and distressing days, it is nice to think about a post-COVID-19 world. But while this pandemic ...

Home January 27, 2021
Home
News | Atrial Fibrillation

December 23, 2020 — The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) has made two ...

Home December 23, 2020
Home
Subscribe Now