Feature | Atrial Fibrillation | November 02, 2017

Mixed Results in PREVAIL Trial Comparing Five-Year Data for LAA Closure Compared to Warfarin

Study looked at patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and included a combined meta-analysis with PROTECT AF at TCT 2017 

The Watchman LAA occluder PREVAIL Trial 5-year results were presented at the 2017 TCT meeting.

November 2, 2017 – Five-year results from the PREVAIL Trial comparing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Boston Scientific Watchman device to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation found that the first composite co-primary endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism (SE), or cardiovascular/unexplained death did not achieve noninferiority. However, the second co-primary endpoint of post-procedure ischemic stroke/SE did achieve noninferiority. When combined with the five-year outcomes of the PROTECT AF trial a meta-analysis demonstrated that LAAC provides stroke prevention comparable to warfarin, with additional reductions in major bleeding, particularly hemorrhagic stroke and mortality.

Findings were reported at the 2017 Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific symposium and published simultaneously in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

“Beyond PROTECT AF, PREVAIL is the only other completed randomized clinical trial comparing any LAAC device with an oral anticoagulant,” said Saibal Kar, M.D., director of cardiovascular intervention center research at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. “Based on the combined results of these two studies, left atrial appendage closure is a reasonable strategy for stroke prophylaxis for patients who are poor candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation.”

Because of identical efficacy endpoint definitions in both the PROTECT AF and PREVAIL trials, and the near-identical eligibility criteria, data from both trials were pooled for a patient-level meta-analysis. The PROTECT AF and PREVAIL trials enrolled 707 and 407 patients, respectively, who were randomized 2:1 to the LAAC and warfarin arms. In both trials, patients were followed for the protocol-defined maximum time period of five years, ending in 2013 and 2017. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both studies.

For the PREVAIL trial, all endpoints required the inclusion of the PROTECT AF informative prior, resulting in a calculated 18-month rate of the first coprimary endpoint (composite of stroke, systemic embolism (SE), or cardiovascular/unexplained death) of 0.066 with LAAC versus 0.051 for warfarin, yielding a mean 18-month rate ratio of 1.33 (95% credible interval: 0.78 to 2.13). It did not achieve noninferiority (posterior probability for noninferiority = 88.4%). However, the second coprimary endpoint of post-procedure ischemic stroke/SE did achieve noninferiority (posterior probability for noninferiority = 97.5%). The calculated 18-month rate for the second coprimary efficacy endpoint was 0.0255 in the LAAC group versus 0.0135 in the warfarin group (rate difference 0.0120; 95% credible interval: -0.0036 to 0.0275) At five years, the warfarin arm maintained an unexpectedly low ischemic stroke rate (0.73%), as compared with other studies examining such a regimen.

In the meta-analysis of PROTECT AF and PREVAIL with five-year follow-up, the composite endpoint was similar between groups (HR: 0.820; P=0.27), as were all-stroke/SE (HR: 0.961; P= 0.87). The ischemic stroke/SE rate was numerically higher with LAAC, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (HR: 1.71; P=0.080). However, differences in hemorrhagic stroke, disabling/fatal stroke, cardiovascular/unexplained death, all-cause death, and post-procedure bleeding favored LAAC (HR: 0.20; P=0.0022; HR: 0.45; P=0.03; HR: 0.59; P=0.027; HR: 0.73; P=0.035; HR: 0.48; P=0.0003, respectively). Therefore, the meta-analysis demonstrates comparable efficacy and stroke rates with no significant difference across subgroups, no significant differences in ischemic stroke rates versus warfarin, and significant, superior reductions in disabling strokes, non-procedural bleeding, and mortality.

The PREVAIL trial was funded by Boston Scientific. Kar reported that he received research grants from and served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific; has served as a member of the advisory board for left atrial appendage closure; is the national principal investigator of the Continuous Access Registries (CAP & CAP2); and has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific.

For more information: www.crf.org

 

Related Content

TCT 2017 Late-breaking Clinical Trial Presentations

Related Content

Atrial Fibrillation Patients Diagnosed With Carotid Atery Disease Face Increased Risk of Dementia

Image courtesy of Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute

News | Atrial Fibrillation | May 24, 2018
Atrial fibrillation patients who are diagnosed with carotid artery disease face higher risks for developing dementia,...
Botulinum Toxin (botox) Injection in CABG Patients Reduces AFib After Cardiac Surgery. #HRS2018

Figure 1: At the end of 36 months, the incidence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 23.3 percent in the botox group, as compared to 50 percent in the placebo group

News | Atrial Fibrillation | May 18, 2018
 
Atrial fibrillation ablation using the Abbott Ensite electro mapping system. CABANA Trial Confirms Ablation Equal To or Superior to Drug Therapy. #HRS2018

Atrial fibrillation ablation using the Abbott Ensite electro mapping system.

Feature | Atrial Fibrillation | May 17, 2018
May 16, 2018 – The first results of the randomized, multicenter, long-term, international...
Link Found Between Post-Traumatic Stress, Increased Risk of AFib. #HRS2018
News | Atrial Fibrillation | May 15, 2018
May 15, 2018 — A new study is the first to report a relationship between post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and ne
Marijuana Use Does Not Increase Risk of Arrhythmias, Might Reduce AFib Risk. #HRS2018
News | Atrial Fibrillation | May 15, 2018
May 15, 2018 — According to new research, smoking marijuana may not be associated with an increased risk of ventricul
First Results Reported from AVIATOR 2 Registry for AFib Patients Undergoing PCI.

Photo courtesy of the American Heart Association

News | Atrial Fibrillation | May 15, 2018
May 15, 2018 – Results of the AVIATOR 2 international registry data show a discrepancy between physician perception a
New Combined Risk Score More Effectively Predicts Stroke Risk in AFib Patients

Image courtesy of Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute

News | Atrial Fibrillation | May 11, 2018
A new study finds that integrating two separate clinical risk score models more accurately helps clinicians assess the...
Depression Linked to Increased Atrial Fibrillation Risk
News | Atrial Fibrillation | March 27, 2018
March 27, 2018 — Depression may increase the risk for...
Boston Scientific's Apama multi-electrode ablation balloon to treat atrial fibrillation.

Boston Scientific's Apama multi-electrode ablation balloon to treat atrial fibrillation. The technology allows different energies to be used for each electrode to prevent damage to the esophagus or other underlying critical structures. 

Feature | Atrial Fibrillation | January 15, 2018 | Dave Fornell
The development of atrial fibrillation (AFib or AF) ablation technologies over the past 20 years has been a constant
Overlay Init