April 7, 2016 — Emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain show improved knowledge of their health status and follow-up options after talking through treatment options with a physician, according to Mayo Clinic research. The study, presented at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 65th Annual Scientific Session, compared these patients with those who received standard counseling from a physician.
Chest pain accounts for about 8 million emergency department visits each year in the United States, but more than 90 percent of those patients are not experiencing a heart attack, said Erik Hess, M.D., lead author and emergency medicine physician at Mayo Clinic. “An electrocardiogram and blood tests can tell us if a patient is having a heart attack. Further testing may be needed to tell us if a patient faces an increased risk of heart attack in the near future. We wanted to know if there is value in discussing this further testing with patients.”
In the study, which involved 898 patients visiting six emergency departments in five states, half of the patients were randomly assigned to receive a physician discussion using Chest Pain Choice, the first patient-oriented tool designed to help shared decision-making between patients and physicians for chest pain. Patients were shown one-page information sheets that provide descriptions and graphics depicting a patient’s specific risk, such as a 2 percent risk of having a heart attack in the next 45 days and the next steps for care.
Results showed that patients who received Chest Pain Choice increased their knowledge about their risk and options, answering 53 percent of questions on a questionnaire correctly, compared with 44.6 percent in the patients who received standard physician consultation. In addition, patients were asked to evaluate the experience of discussing their care with their physician. Of patients who received Chest Pain Choice, 68.9 percent said they would recommend the way they discussed care and options with their physicians, compared with 61.2 percent of those who received standard care.
“This trial shows that patient engagement in care can be beneficial to the patient’s understanding and treatment, and can lead to better care and more efficient use of resources,” Hess said, adding that Chest Pain Choice was associated with no major adverse heart events and led to a significantly lower proportion of patients receiving a stress test.
Co-authors are: Judd Hollander, M.D., Thomas Jefferson University; Jason Schaeffer, M.D., and Jeff Kline, M.D., both of Indiana University Bloomington; Deborah Diercks, M.D., University of Texas Southwestern; Russell Jones M.D., University of California, Davis; Jeph Herrin Ph.D., Yale University School of Medicine; Michel Demers; and Nilay Shah, Ph.D., Jonathan Inselman, Carlos Torres, M.D., Ph.D., Annie LeBlanc Ph.D., Ana Castaneda-Guarderas M.D., and Victor Montori, M.D., all of Mayo Clinic.
The study was funded by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery.
For more information: www.acc.org