News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 25, 2017

Intensive Glycemic Control Program Produces Significant Per-Patient Cost Savings for CABG Surgery

Post-hoc cost analysis of the GLUCO-CABG trial finds personalized insulin dosing also reduces length of stay in ICU and perioperative complications

Intensive Glycemic Control Program Produces Significant Per-Patient Cost Savings for CABG Surgery

May 25, 2017 — A new study from Emory University observed a near-20 percent reduction in perioperative complications, a 1.2-day reduction in ICU stay and a $3,654 reduction in per-patient hospitalization costs for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The reported outcomes, which included no severe hypoglycemia less than 40 mg/dL, were derived from an intensive glycemic control protocol supported by Glytec’s Glucommander for personalized insulin dosing.

The study, published in the April 2017 issue of Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications, is a post-hoc cost analysis of the GLUCO-CABG trial published in the October 2015 issue of Diabetes Care. The GLUCO-CABG trial was a randomized open-label clinical study  of CABG surgery patients with and without diabetes who experienced perioperative hyperglycemia (defined as a blood glucose greater than 140 mg/dL). A total of 302 patients between ages 18 and 80 were randomized to an intensive glycemic control group (target blood glucose of 100 to 140 mg/dL) or a conservative glycemic control group (target blood glucose of 141 to 180 mg/dL). Both groups were treated using Glucommander to guide intravenous insulin dosing while in the ICU.

“We observed a significant reduction in cost between those treated to the intensive target and those treated to the conservative target,” explains a study author, Guillermo Umpierrez, M.D., professor of medicine and director of clinical research for the Diabetes and Metabolism Center at Emory University. “This reduction, which was more than $3,600 per patient, is the result of multiple factors. Not only did we reduce complications and length of stay, we reduced resource utilization across pharmacy, radiology, laboratory, consultations and ICU.”

Study data indicate the mean blood glucose was 132.5 mg/dL among patients in the intensive glycemic control group and 154.4 mg/dL among patients in the conservative glycemic control group, which Umpierrez believes is the primary factor behind the reduction in perioperative complications (of near-20 percent). Umpierrez also believes the reduction in complications contributed to the reduction in both ICU stay (of 1.2 days) and hospitalization costs.

“A measured advance in the treatment of inpatient hyperglycemia, especially in the intensive care area, has been the development of computer-guided algorithms for insulin dosing; also, alerts to help the nurses stay on top of glycemic indicators and blood glucose checks,” Umpierrez said. “We use the Glytec system with Glucommander to help facilitate hyperglycemic management, and adjust insulin dosing according to the many changes that happen in the ICU, in a safe way.”

Glucommander is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared decision support solution for intravenous and subcutaneous insulin dosing in the treatment of patients both with and without diabetes. Healthcare providers are able to access Glucommander through Glytec’s eGlycemic Management System (eGMS), a software-as-a-service platform.

The most important consideration in the improvement of glycemic control, Umpierrez said, is safety: “Hypoglycemia has been shown to be associated with higher morbidity, mortality and hospitalization costs. Thus, physicians frequently avoid intensive glycemic control due to fear of hypoglycemia. To break treatment inertia, we need safe tools to improve glycemic control with minimal risk of hypoglycemia. I think the GLUCO-CABG trial and other studies recently published have clearly indicated that improving glycemic control with minimal risk of hypoglycemia results in improved outcomes.”

Another key observation from the post-hoc cost analysis of the GLUCO-CABG trial was the difference in economic outcomes when comparing patients with perioperative complications to patients without perioperative complications. “We found that patients with perioperative complications had a longer overall length of stay, by four days (10.7 days vs. 6.7 days; p=0.001), higher total hospitalization costs ($48,299 vs. $32,675; p=0.001) and more resource utilization units (2,745 vs. 1,710; p=0.001),” explained lead author Saumeth Cardona, M.D., clinical research coordinator IV in the Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids at Emory University.

For more information:

Related Content

Transplanting Pig Hearts Into Humans One Step Closer
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | December 11, 2018
The scientific journal Nature recently published an article from Munich University Hospital which describes the long-...
Bilateral Artery Use Does Not Improve 10-Year CABG Outcomes
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | September 06, 2018
While it is firmly established that the use of one internal thoracic artery can improve life expectancy in coronary...
Mandatory Public Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reporting Associated With Better Patient Outcomes
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | April 30, 2018
Mandatory public reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) results in Massachusetts was associated with...
Gecko Biomedical Receives CE Mark Approval for Setalum Sealant
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | September 19, 2017
Gecko Biomedical announced it has received CE Mark approval for its Setalum Sealant, allowing the company to market its...
ClearFlow Inc. Announces Positive U.S. Clinical Trial Results
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | September 08, 2017
September 8, 2017 — ClearFlow Inc.
Videos | Cardiovascular Surgery | July 19, 2017
This video educational session, provided in partnership with the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE), is title
Risk of Heart Transplant Rejection Reduced by Desensitizing Patient Antibodies
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 23, 2017
The risk of heart transplant rejection can be reduced by desensitizing patient antibodies, according to research...
Scientists Show How Cells React to Injury From Open-Heart Surgery
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 04, 2017
Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute investigators have learned how cardiac muscle cells react to a certain type of injury that...
ERACS Session Highlights Need for Standardized Best Practices in Cardiac Surgery
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 02, 2017
The recently formed group Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) hosted an organizing session in Boston on...
Overlay Init