News | FFR Technologies | May 17, 2021

No Benefit to FFR-guided PCI in STEMI Patients With Multi-Vessel Disease

FLOWER-MI trial finds that FFR approach is not cost effective and angiography alone has same outcomes

The FLOWER-MI trial presented at ACC 2021 found no benefit to FFR-guided PCI in STEMI with multi-vessel disease. #ACC21 #ACC2021 #FFR

The FLOWER-MI trial presented at ACC 2021 found no benefit to FFR-guided PCI in STEMI with multi-vessel disease.


May 17, 2021 — In patients who received a coronary stent for an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) heart attack, the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to see if a second stent is needed did not improve outcomes and was more costly than using angiography. The study found guiding procedures with angiography X-ray imaging alone and more effective. 

This was according to the data from the FLOWER-MI trial presented at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2021 scientific session. This study was simultaneously published online in the New England Journal of Medicine at the time of presentation.[1]

“The strategy of using FFR to guide the stenting procedure is not superior to the standard technique of using angiography to treat additional partially blocked arteries,” said Etienne Puymirat, M.D., professor of cardiology at the University of Paris, director of intensive care at the Georges Pompidou Hospital in Paris and principal investigator of the study. “In addition to having no benefit, we have also shown that, based on costs in France, the FFR-guided strategy is more expensive.”

Most heart attacks are caused by a blood clot in an artery to the heart that’s been narrowed by a buildup of fatty deposits, or plaque. In the most severe type of STEMI heart attack, an artery to the heart is completely blocked, causing the death of some heart tissue.

The current study, known as the FLOWER-MI trial, was the first to do a head-to-head comparison of outcomes in STEMI patients with multi-vessel disease who underwent either FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or stenting guided by angiography alone.

FFR is a measure of blood flow and pressure through a narrowed coronary artery. It is performed during angiography to determine if the stenosis, or narrowing of the artery, is significant and to guide the stenting procedure. Previous studies have shown that STEMI patients treated with FFR-guided stenting had better outcomes than those treated with medication alone, without the insertion of a stent.

Clinicians typically use angiography to assess the extent of blockage in the coronary artery and guide the stenting procedure.

The trial, conducted at 41 centers in France, enrolled 1,171 patients who had a stent inserted into a blocked coronary artery after a STEMI heart attack and who also had a second coronary artery that was at least 50% blocked. The patients’ average age was 62 years and 83% were men. Immediately after their first stenting procedure, all patients were randomly assigned to undergo a second stenting procedure in the partially blocked artery, guided either by FFR or by angiography alone. The second procedure was performed within five days of the first during the same hospitalization.

After 12 months, 5.5% of patients in the FFR-guided group had died, had another non-fatal heart attack or had undergone an additional stenting procedure, compared with 4.2% of those in the angiography-guided group, a non-statistically significant difference. Moreover, the FFR-guided procedure was more expensive than the one guided by angiography alone.

The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in both groups of patients was considerably lower than the researchers expected, Puymirat said. “These patients were at high cardiovascular risk because of having multi-vessel disease,” he said. “Using data from previous trials and registries in this population, we estimated that about 15% of patients would have an adverse event within one year, but in our study the rate was 5% at one year.”

The study failed to meet its primary endpoint, a composite of death from any cause, non-fatal heart attack, or urgent need for an additional stenting procedure within 12 months. A secondary endpoint looking at cost-effectiveness favored the use of angiography alone. However, the cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the costs of the two treatment approaches in France and might not be applicable in other countries, Puymirat said.

The researchers will continue to follow the patients in the study for another two years. The study was funded by a grant from the French Ministry of Health with additional support from Abbott.
 

Find links to more ACC 2021 late-breakers

Find more FFR tchnology content

 

Reference:

1. Etienne Puymirat, Guillaume Cayla, Tabassome Simon, M.D., Ph.D., Philippe G. Steg, et al., for the FLOWER-MI Study InvestigatorsMultivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. May 16, 2021. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104650

 

Related Content

News | ACC

December 7, 2021 — The American College of Cardiology (ACC) has named Ami B. Bhatt, M.D., FACC, as chief innovation ...

Home December 07, 2021
Home
Feature | ACC | By Dave Fornell, Editor

Here are the top 10 takeaways from the late-breaking studies on cardiovascular technologies presented at the 2021 ...

Home June 08, 2021
Home
Feature | ACC | Dave Fornell, Editor

The latest cardiology practice-changing scientific breakthrough, late-breaking study presentations have been announced ...

Home May 18, 2021
Home
Feature | ACC

February 22, 2021 — The American College of Cardiology (ACC) moved its meeting from March to May 2021 in hopes that ...

Home February 22, 2021
Home
News | ACC | By Dave Fornell, Editor

UPDATE Feb 22, 2021 — ACC Abandons In-person Meeting and Goes Entirely Virtual for 2021 Due to COVID February 9, 2021 — ...

Home February 09, 2021
Home
Feature | ACC | Dave Fornell, Editor

Here is the list of American College of Cardiology (ACC) practice-changing late-breaking study presentations at the ACC ...

Home April 09, 2020
Home
Feature | ACC | Dave Fornell, Editor

March 9, 2020 — Less than week after the American College of Cardiology (ACC) said it would push ahead with holding its ...

Home March 09, 2020
Home
News | ACC

October 8, 2019 — Douglas Drachman, M.D., FACC, has been selected as the next vice chair of the American College of ...

Home October 08, 2019
Home
Feature | ACC | Greg Freiherr, Contributing Editor

The fingerprints of value-added medicine were all over products and works-in-progress on the exhibit floor of the annual ...

Home March 27, 2019
Home
Feature | ACC

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) released a list of the latest practice-changing presentations at the ACC.19 ...

Home March 19, 2019
Home
Subscribe Now