News | Atrial Fibrillation | March 29, 2020

POPULAR TAVR Shows Oral Anticoagulants Alone in AF Patients Reduces Bleeding Post TAVR

ACC late-breaker shows OAC can be used safely in 30 percent of TAVR patients with atrial fibrillation

POPULAR TAVR trial Shows Oral Anticoagulants Alone in atrial fibrillation  (AF) Patients Reduces Bleeding Post TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement. #ACC20 #ACC2020

March 29, 2020 — Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who took oral anticoagulants alone after undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) had a lower rate of bleeding complications without an increased risk of clotting-related complications compared to patients who took antiplatelet medication in addition to oral anticoagulants. This was the outcome of the POPULAR TAVR trial, presented as a late-breaking session at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2020 Scientific Session.[1]

About 30 percent of patients who undergo TAVR have AF, and there have not been any guidelines on how to treat these patients, who require anticoagulation therapy to prevent AF-caused stroke. This trial offers new data on how these patients can be managed.

The new study, antiplatelet therapy for Patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (POPular-TAVI), is the first randomized trial designed to assess the safety of oral anticoagulants alone as compared to using antiplatelet drugs alongside oral anticoagulants for managing TAVR complication risks in these patients. Anticoagulants work by interfering with proteins involved in the formation of blood clots, while antiplatelet drugs prevent platelets, a type of blood cell, from clumping together.

“The rates of complications for TAVR — especially complications related to bleeding — remain high,” said Vincent Nijenhuis, M.D., from the cardiology department at St. Antonius Hospital in Nieuwegein, Netherlands, and the study’s lead author. “This study helps physicians to better understand the risks of adding antiplatelet therapy to oral anticoagulants—namely, that doing so leads to more bleeding without reducing the rate of ischemic events. I think once physicians are aware of this, they will not treat patients undergoing TAVR so aggressively, leading to better outcomes.”

Both bleeding and clotting-related complications (such as stroke and heart attack) can be life threatening, especially among patients undergoing TAVR, who are generally older, have multiple comorbid conditions and are frailer than those who undergo open heart valve replacement. In focusing on patients with atrial fibrillation, who typically take oral anticoagulants for many years, the trial sought to address how best to balance the risk of clots against the increased risk of bleeding that comes with any anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.

Researchers enrolled 313 patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing TAVR at 17 sites in four European countries. Half were assigned to take oral anticoagulants alone and half took the antiplatelet drug clopidogrel for three months after TAVR in addition to oral anticoagulants.

At 12 months, those taking oral anticoagulants alone were significantly less likely to suffer bleeding complications than those who took oral anticoagulants plus clopidogrel, meeting the trial’s prespecified composite primary endpoint. The first component of the composite primary endpoint, all bleeding as  assessed with the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) definition, occurred in 21.7 percent of those receiving only oral anticoagulants and 34.6 percent of those receiving clopidogrel. The second component, nonprocedural bleeding as assessed with the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria, occurred in 21.7 percent of those receiving only oral anticoagulants and 34 percent of those receiving clopidogrel. This reflects a 43 percent reduction in the rate of bleeding complications among those taking oral anticoagulants alone.

In a secondary analysis, patients taking oral anticoagulants alone did not show an increased risk of clotting-related complications, meeting the trial’s prespecified secondary endpoint for non-inferiority. A composite of cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke and heart attack occurred in 13.4 percent of those receivingonly oral anticoagulants and 17.3 percent of those receiving clopidogrel, while a composite of those outcomes plus non-procedural bleeding occurred in 31.2 percent of patients receiving only oral anticoagulants and 45.5 percent of patients receiving clopidogrel.

“The results suggest it would be beneficial to not give clopidogrel — in fact, it’s safer because it does not lead to as many bleeding events,” Nijenhuis said.

The study is limited by its open label design, which means patients and doctors were aware of which patients had been randomized to receive clopidogrel versus oral anticoagulants alone, although outcomes were adjudicated by independent evaluators who were blinded to patients’ treatment status. In addition, Nijenhuis said that the study’s findings are only applicable to patients with atrial fibrillation. The researchers are assessing antiplatelet management in patients without atrial fibrillation in a separate cohort of the ongoing POPular TAVI study. Other studies are underway to assess other types of anticoagulation medications such as direct oral anticoagulants.

This study was simultaneously published online in the New England Journal of Medicine at the time of presentation. The trial was funded by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development


Find more news from ACC 2020.



1. Vincent J. Nijenhuis, M.D., Jorn Brouwer, M.D., Ronak Delewi, et al. Anticoagulation with or without Clopidogrel after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation. NEJM. Published online March 29, 2020. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915152.

Related Content

Feature | ACC | By Dave Fornell, Editor

Here are the top 10 takeaways from the late-breaking studies on cardiovascular technologies presented at the 2021 ...

Home June 08, 2021
Feature | ACC | Dave Fornell, Editor

The latest cardiology practice-changing scientific breakthrough, late-breaking study presentations have been announced ...

Home May 18, 2021
Feature | ACC

February 22, 2021 — The American College of Cardiology (ACC) moved its meeting from March to May 2021 in hopes that ...

Home February 22, 2021
News | ACC | By Dave Fornell, Editor

UPDATE Feb 22, 2021 — ACC Abandons In-person Meeting and Goes Entirely Virtual for 2021 Due to COVID February 9, 2021 — ...

Home February 09, 2021
Feature | ACC | Dave Fornell, Editor

Here is the list of American College of Cardiology (ACC) practice-changing late-breaking study presentations at the ACC ...

Home April 09, 2020
Feature | ACC | Dave Fornell, Editor

March 9, 2020 — Less than week after the American College of Cardiology (ACC) said it would push ahead with holding its ...

Home March 09, 2020
News | ACC

October 8, 2019 — Douglas Drachman, M.D., FACC, has been selected as the next vice chair of the American College of ...

Home October 08, 2019
Feature | ACC | Greg Freiherr, Contributing Editor

The fingerprints of value-added medicine were all over products and works-in-progress on the exhibit floor of the annual ...

Home March 27, 2019
Feature | ACC

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) released a list of the latest practice-changing presentations at the ACC.19 ...

Home March 19, 2019
Feature | ACC | Dave Fornell

There were several notable presentations of new data on cardiovascular technologies at the recent 2018 American College ...

Home March 27, 2018
Subscribe Now