Feature | December 04, 2013

Data Shows Mitral Valve Replacement Possibly More Effective Than Mitral Valve Repair

Study may impact practice guidelines for mitral valve surgery for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation

heart valve repair clinical trial study cardiovascular surgery mitral
December 4, 2013 — The Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN), whose Data and Clinical Coordinating Center is at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, is reporting evidence on whether or not there is any significant difference between the two current surgical approaches to treat patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation: mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement.
 
The findings, presented Nov. 18 at the American Heart Association’s (AHA’S) Scientific Sessions 2013 and published simultaneously by the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), report similar clinical outcomes one-year following mitral valve surgery for both surgical approaches. Although patient clinical outcomes were similar, mitral valve replacement was shown to be more durable than repair.
 
"While the medical community has traditionally gravitated towards valve repair as a preferred treatment option, the evidence in this study does not suggest that mitral valve repair is superior," said Michael Acker, M.D., chief, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, director, Penn Medicine Heart and Vascular Center, and lead author of the study. "Further patient follow-up is needed to confirm the findings of this trial, but we believe these results should be very helpful for cardiologists and surgeons in choosing an appropriate approach for this growing patient population."
 
“Ischemic mitral regurgitation is an important public health problem affecting as many as two million Americans. Our study is the first definitive clinical trial to address the relative merits of mitral valve repair versus mitral valve replacement surgery in patients suffering from severe ischemic mitral regurgitation,” said Annetine Gelijns, Ph.D., professor and chair, department of health evidence and policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, corresponding author for the NEJM study and principal investigator for the Data and Clinical Coordinating Center based at Mount Sinai for the NIH-sponsored Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN), which conducted the clinical trial study.
 
If not surgically corrected, ischemic mitral regurgitation has been reported to potentially have a one-year mortality risk as high as 40 percent. Currently, practice guidelines recommend valve repair or replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. However, lack of evidence has led to uncertainty and variation in surgical practice, although surgeons’ use of repair has increased over time.
 
Previous research has shown mitral valve repair has lower operative mortality and complications, while mitral valve replacement may provide better long-term correction of mitral regurgitation.
 
“These results may impact the surgical care of patients experiencing severe ischemic mitral regurgitation and offer the strongest evidence to date to inform future surgical practice guidelines,” said Michael Parides, Ph.D., professor of biostatistics, department of health evidence and policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and principal statistician, CTSN.
 
The multicenter, randomized clinical trial included 22 clinical centers in North America randomizing 251 patients. It evaluated the safety and effectiveness of mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement in patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. Comparative effectiveness was based on the degree of left ventricular remodeling, mortality, adverse events, recurrent mitral regurgitation, hospitalizations, and quality of life one year after surgery. 
 
“While our study results clearly demonstrate that patient outcomes with replacement and repair are similar one-year after surgery, our ongoing patient follow-up is extremely important, as it will reveal any consequences for patients whose mitral regurgitation has recurred,” said Alan Moskowitz, M.D., professor and vice chair, department of health evidence and policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and study co-author.
 
As principal investigator for CTSN’s Data and Clinical Coordinating Center based at Mount Sinai, Gelijns previously received financial compensation as a consultant for InHealth’s Research Council, a not-for-profit agency which has supported some of the study-related analyses.
 
This study was presented as the Late-Breaking Clinical Trial (Abstract 19636): Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Is it Better to Repair or Replace the Valve? It was also presented at the 2013 Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA) by by researchers at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. A total of 22 centers conducted the study.
 
For more information: www.mountsinai.org

Related Content

common adult CT examinations, computed tomography, diagnostic reference levels, DRLs, radiation dose, achievable dose, AD
News | Radiation Dose Management| February 23, 2017
Using data from the world’s largest computed tomography (CT) dose index registry, researchers have established national...
News | Cardiac Diagnostics| February 17, 2017
Levels of a protein in the blood associated with heart disease are also linked to early-stage brain damage, according...
Edwards Intuity Elite sutureless aortic valve, first implants in Connecticut, WCHN, Western Connecticut Health Network
News | Cardiovascular Surgery| February 16, 2017
Western Connecticut Health Network (WCHN) cardiothoracic surgeons Cary Passik, M.D., and Robert Gallagher, M.D., were...
Mercator MedSystems, DANCE trial data, ISET, LINC, Bullfrog Micro-Infusion Device
News | Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)| February 15, 2017
Mercator MedSystems announced that the national co-principal investigators of the company’s DANCE trial each presented...
heart team, hybird OR, structural heart team

The heart team approach was first used on a large scale in the CoreValve and Sapien TAVR trials and helped lead to excellent outcomes in high-risk patients.

Feature | Hybrid OR| February 15, 2017 | Dave Fornell
In the current era of healthcare reform and the push toward evidence-based medicine to both lower costs and improve p
Xarelto, rivaroxaban, COMPASS study, ends early,
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| February 09, 2017
February 9, 2017 — Janssen Research & Development LLC (Janssen) announced that the Phase 3 COMPASS trial is stopp
Medtronic, IDE approval, IN.PACT Admiral drug-coated balloon, DCB, end-stage renal disease
News | Drug-Eluting Balloons| February 08, 2017
Medtronic plc announced receipt of an investigational device exemption (IDE) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration...
CSI, LIBERTY 360 Study, ISET 2017, six-month data, lower extremity PAD
News | Atherectomy Devices| February 08, 2017
February 8, 2017 — Cardiovascular Systems (CSI) presented six-month data from its LIBERTY 360° post-market study in a
Penn Medicine, heart failure causes, YAP and TAZ proteins, Journal of Clinical Investigation study
News | Heart Failure| February 07, 2017
February 7, 2017 — Of the more than 700,000 Americans who suffer a heart attack each year, about a quarter go on to d
Avinger, VISION Study, two-year outcomes, LINC, Lumivascular technology, Pantheris, OCT-guided atherectomy
News | Atherectomy Devices| February 03, 2017
Avinger Inc. recently announced positive two-year clinical data from the pivotal VISION study of the company’s...
Overlay Init