Feature | May 20, 2014

FDA Gathers Information on How to Regulate 3-D Printing of Medical Devices

Workshop will look at technical considerations for printing medical devices on demand

3-d pronting, 3D printing

The University of Arizona is using 3-D printing of pediatric patients chest cavities and organs to confirm if the Syncardia ventricular assist device (VAD) can fit in specific patients.

May 20, 2014 — It is possible to use 3-D printer technology to create some types of customized medical devices on demand, and some research centers are developing technology to print more complex devices like heart valves using biocompatible materials. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recognized the technology now exists to print these types of devices and is gathering information regarding technical assessments that should be considered when it will inevitably begin reviewing these types of future FDA submissions.

The FDA will host a workshop titled “Additive Manufacturing of Medical Devices: An Interactive Discussion on the Technical Considerations of 3-D Printing,” Oct. 8-9, 2014, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Silver Spring, Md. The purpose of this workshop is to provide a forum for FDA, medical device manufactures, additive manufacturing companies and academia to discuss technical challenges and solutions of 3-D printing. 

Additive manufacturing, also known as 3-D printing, is a fast- growing manufacturing technique that builds devices from computerized blueprints or models, by layering material only where it is needed as if building with interlocking bricks. Traditional methods of manufacturing remove material from larger pieces by cutting, drilling, and carving to create a final part. Through additive manufacturing designers can alter products quickly for rapid prototype iteration or produce small batches of multiple product designs in each batch. The 3- D computer models used to build each part can be created using traditional computer-aided design techniques or they can be made directly from 3-D image sources, such as computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Designers can also use a combination of techniques. Consequently, the FDA said 3-D printers can create truly anatomically matched devices or surgical guides by utilizing a patient's own medical imaging. 
 
Additive manufacturing is just beginning to enter mainstream use in medical devices. The FDA said this technology unlocks new avenues for creativity and innovation for medical device designers. For example, the FDA said it can facilitate the production of devices with intricate structures that were previously impractical or impossible. Current industry applications include using it as an alternative device production method for traditional components or as a primary method to create patient-matched devices. As the technology matures, additional capabilities may be incorporated into medical devices. 
 
FDA said it already has begun to receive submissions using additive manufacturing for both traditional and patient-matched devices, and it sees many more on the horizon. Industry forecasts project significant growth of additive manufacturing in both traditional and innovative environments by 2025.   
 
Additive manufacturing may or may not present new questions depending on its use. However, the FDA said it realizes there are technical challenges associated with the process from design to final product that need to be properly addressed in all cases to ensure patient safety and to promote innovation in a fast-moving field. Process verification and validation are especially important when devices are produced individually or in very small batches. 
 
By discussing and addressing these technical challenges through an open forum, FDA would like to foster innovation with a transparent process and shared expectations for stakeholders. Participants in the October workshop will include researchers, scientists and engineers involved with the research and development of products using additive manufacturing as one or more steps of the manufacturing process. The intent is to address scientific and technical challenges posed by additive manufacturing process, but not address specific printing technologies or medical device types. The latter will still be covered by their respective standards and guidance documents. Ideas generated during this workshop may facilitate development of new draft guidance and/or standards for additive manufacturing of medical devices. 
 
The FDA said it will include discussions on several topics, including preprinting considerations, including material chemistry, physical properties, recyclability, part reproducibility and process validation. Printing considerations will include printing process characterization, software used in the process, post-processing steps such as curing, and  additional machining. Post-printing considerations will include cleaning/excess material removal, effect of complexity on sterilization and biocompatibility, final device mechanics, design envelope and verification. 
 
For more information: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-05-19/html/2014-11513.htm?source=govdelivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
 
 

Related Content

Mandatory Public Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reporting Associated With Better Patient Outcomes
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | April 30, 2018
Mandatory public reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) results in Massachusetts was associated with...
Gecko Biomedical Receives CE Mark Approval for Setalum Sealant
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | September 19, 2017
Gecko Biomedical announced it has received CE Mark approval for its Setalum Sealant, allowing the company to market its...
ClearFlow Inc. Announces Positive U.S. Clinical Trial Results
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | September 08, 2017
September 8, 2017 — ClearFlow Inc.
Videos | Cardiovascular Surgery | July 19, 2017
This video educational session, provided in partnership with the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE), is title
Intensive Glycemic Control Program Produces Significant Per-Patient Cost Savings for CABG Surgery
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 25, 2017
A new study from Emory University observed a near-20 percent reduction in perioperative complications, a 1.2-day...
Risk of Heart Transplant Rejection Reduced by Desensitizing Patient Antibodies
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 23, 2017
The risk of heart transplant rejection can be reduced by desensitizing patient antibodies, according to research...
Scientists Show How Cells React to Injury From Open-Heart Surgery
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 04, 2017
Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute investigators have learned how cardiac muscle cells react to a certain type of injury that...
ERACS Session Highlights Need for Standardized Best Practices in Cardiac Surgery
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 02, 2017
The recently formed group Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) hosted an organizing session in Boston on...
ClearFlow Receives Frost & Sullivan New Product Innovation Award for PleuraFlow Technology
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 01, 2017
ClearFlow Inc. has received the prestigious 2017 Global Frost & Sullivan Award for New Product Innovation. The...
Edwards Intuity Elite sutureless aortic valve, first implants in Connecticut, WCHN, Western Connecticut Health Network
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | February 16, 2017
Western Connecticut Health Network (WCHN) cardiothoracic surgeons Cary Passik, M.D., and Robert Gallagher, M.D., were...
Overlay Init