Feature | May 06, 2014

The National Lipid Association Addresses Safety of Statins, Provides Recommendations to Clinicians and Patients

Expert panel proposes a definition of ‘statin intolerance’

May 6, 2014 — The National Lipid Association (NLA) recently convened an expert panel to examine various aspects of statin safety and statin tolerance. Results of the symposium findings are published this month in the Journal of Clinical Lipidology, addressing six specific statin-related safety issues including the effects of statins on cognition, diabetes risk, liver function, muscle symptoms and interactions with other drugs, and statin intolerance. The paper reflects an update of a consensus report that was published by the NLA in 2006 related to the muscle, liver, renal and neurologic effects of statins.

According to Terry A. Jacobson, M.D., professor of medicine at Emory University, who chaired the NLA Statin Safety Expert Panel, “With the number of new patients now eligible to receive statin drugs under the new 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines, this will provide welcome reassurance about the safety of these agents, particularly given recent negative media reports.”

Jacobson pointed out that in starting any new drug the potential benefits must be weighed against the potential risks, and that “the initiation of statins was heavily weighted to overwhelming benefit those at increased cardiovascular risk.”

Highlights on findings from each of the statin task forces include:

  • The Statin Intolerance Task Force presents a pragmatic definition of ‘statin intolerance’ as adverse symptoms, signs and/or laboratory abnormalities attributed by the patient and/or provider to a statin and perceived by the patient to interfere with daily life activities. These include predominately muscle-related symptoms with muscle aches being the most common, but also may include other symptoms, liver enzyme increases and isolated muscle enzyme (creatine kinase) increases. These effects are generally temporally related to statin use, improve when the statin is stopped and return when the statin is restarted. The panel reaffirms that statins are safe, because mortality or permanent disability due to statin treatment is very rare. However, statin intolerance is not rare, approaching 10 to 20 percent of patients. Because statins are safe, the panel recommends that the clinician and patient should keep trying to adjust doses and type of statin in order to maintain statin therapy at some level when cardiovascular risk is high.
  • The Statin Cognition Safety Task Force acknowledges that cognitive complaints have been reported in patients being treated with statins; however, it also notes that the incidence of cognitive impairment increases with age, and a variety of other possible causes of cognitive complaints also need to be considered in statin users. The task force indicates there is no definitive evidence that statins as a class have adverse effects on cognition and do not recommend baseline cognitive assessment prior to statin initiation, but do note that the possibility of a statin effect be considered.
  • The Statin Diabetes Safety Task Force acknowledges that meta-analyses suggest a small increased risk (10 to 12 percent) for the development of diabetes with statins, and the risk may be slightly higher with high-intensity statins compared to moderate-intensity statins. It is also possible that most of this risk is confined to patients who are already at high risk for the development of diabetes such as those with the risk factors of the metabolic syndrome. Clinical trial data strongly confirms the superior benefit of statins on cardiovascular disease risk reduction in diabetes patients, and this effect outweighs the much smaller risk of new onset diabetes. The panel recommends that statin treatment should continue in patients who develop diabetes on therapy, and that enhanced lifestyle/behavioral changes be instituted to control weight, increase physical activity and improve diet quality.
  • The Statin Liver Safety Task Force confirms the 2012 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling change for statins wherein post-statin treatment monitoring of liver enzymes is not routinely required. While statins may sometimes cause mild to modest increases in liver enzymes (transaminase levels), this is not typically reflective of liver damage or dysfunction. To assist clinicians in the management of patients with elevated liver enzymes either before or while on statin therapy, the task force provides clinicians a table describing potential non-statin causes of elevated liver enzymes. Also suggested is a diagnostic and statin management algorithm, based upon the patient’s clinical presentation, and liver enzyme and bilirubin levels.
  • The Statin Muscle Safety Task Force defines “statin-associated muscle adverse events” to include myalgia (muscle aches, soreness, stiffness and/or pain) and myopathy (muscle weakness). Myositis is a term used to describe muscle inflammation and includes pain and/or tenderness, which may be accompanied by significant CK elevations. The panel acknowledges that muscle symptoms can be exacerbated by acute and chronic physical activity, that the diagnosis of myopathy (weakness) is determined primarily by physical exam findings of proximal weakness in upper and lower extremities, and that many patients initially intolerant to one statin can tolerate a different statin, possibly with alternative dosing strategies.
  • The Clinician’s Guide to Statin Drug-Drug Interactions report includes a discussion of statin metabolism, with explanations of the transporters responsible for drug handling in the intestine, liver and kidney, and how they are important in determining the plasma levels of statins. Most important, this report has tables for each of the seven statins and the potential drug interactions, with the effects on plasma concentration AUC.


For more information: www.lipidjournal.com

Related Content

Medtronic Announces Global Resolute Onyx DES One-Month DAPT Study
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| August 18, 2017
Medtronic plc announced a global randomized clinical trial that will evaluate one-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT...
Abbott Initiates XIENCE Short DAPT Clinical Trial
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| August 03, 2017
Abbott recently announced the first patient has been enrolled in a clinical study evaluating the short-term use of...
Study Discovers Anticoagulant Drugs Are Being Prescribed Against Safety Advice
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| July 25, 2017
July 25, 2017 — A study by researchers at the University of Birmingham has shown that general practitioners (GPs) are
long-duration dual anti-platelet therapy (L-DAPT) compared to short-duration dual antiplatelet (S-DAPT) after DES stent implantation
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| July 12, 2017
June 12, 2017 — Researchers have evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of long-duration dual anti-platelet ther
Sex-Specific Cardiovascular Drug Dosages Needed to Reduce Adverse Reactions in Women
News | Womens Healthcare| July 07, 2017
Sex-specific cardiovascular drug dosages are needed to reduce adverse reactions in women, according to a position paper...
Bayer Now Enrolling Patients for Global Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Study
News | Hypertension| July 05, 2017
Bayer has enrolled the first patient in a global Phase IV study assessing the clinical effects of riociguat in patients...
FDA Grants Priority Review of Xarelto sNDA for 10 mg Dose
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| June 29, 2017
Janssen Research & Development LLC announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepted for Priority...
radial access, transradial access trial using anticoagulants
News | Radial Access| June 15, 2017
June 15, 2017 — In patients undergoing t...
Cost comparison between NOACs, novel oral anticoagulants
News | Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Therapies| May 31, 2017
May 31, 2017 – The results from the first real-world, matched head-to-head study comparing all-cause healthcare costs
Data was positive from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC) Device from the EWOLUTION registry
News | Atrial Fibrillation| May 30, 2017
May 30, 2017 — Data was positive for safety and efficacy rates of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC) D
Overlay Init