News | April 20, 2009

Courts Decide on Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson Stent Patent Disputes

April 20, 2009 - Boston Scientific recently disclosed the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the District Court’s decision that Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) Bx Velocity and Cypher stents infringe Boston’s patent.

In March the Appeals Court reversed the District Court with respect to J&J’s infringement claims against the TAXUS Liberte Stent and instructed the District Court to dismiss those claims with prejudice. Boston Scientific expects to receive a favorable financial award based on the Appeals Court’s ruling, but in accordance with accounting regulations the company will wait until payment is assured before recording any related gain.

However, the Court of Appeals also affirmed the District Court’s decision that Boston Scientific’s Express, TAXUS Express and Liberte stents infringe one J&J patent. The court also affirmed that Boston Scientific’s Liberte stent infringes a second J&J patent. The company will record an accrual of $237 million ($197 million after-tax) in the first quarter for its estimated exposure on this ruling, in accordance with accounting regulations. This amount represents an estimate of the low end of the range of potential outcomes related to this matter. The range is subject to substantial estimation, including attempting to determine the possible future findings of a jury. As such, the high end of the range cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, the company said.

A damages trial on the above infringements has not been scheduled. No payments are expected to be due until 2010 or later, from either Boston Scientific or J&J.

"We were gratified the appeals court upheld the finding that the BX Velocity and Cypher stents infringe our patent,” said Jim Tobin, president and chief executive officer of Boston Scientific. "We believe this ruling has the potential to result in a significant award from J&J. More broadly, the ultimate resolution of these matters will represent a further reduction in the risk and uncertainty associated with outstanding litigation."

On March 16, the company said it had agreed to settle all outstanding litigation with Bruce N. Saffran, M.D., Ph.D, after a federal court jury in Texas found that the company’s TAXUS Express and TAXUS Liberte stents infringe Dr. Saffran’s patent. The court awarded him damages of $431 million, plus $69 million in pre-judgment interest. However, the company said the settlement calls for a $50 million payment ($43 million after-tax) in the first quarter, and Boston said it does not plan to record any additional charges in relation to this settlement.

The company also announced it will record restructuring and restructuring-related charges of $37 million ($26 million after-tax) in the first quarter associated with its previously announced plant network optimization and expense and staff reduction initiatives.

Boston Scientific also announced it will record a net gain of $63 million (on both a pre-tax and after-tax basis) in the first quarter related to the resolution of the rate of taxation on proceeds received by the Company in 2008 for one of its divested businesses.

For more information: www.bostonscientific.com

Related Content

Elixir Medical Corporation Unveils Transformational DynamX Stent Featuring Adaptive Segments that Uncage the Stented Artery
News | Stents | January 25, 2018
January 25, 2018 – Elixir Medical Corporation, a leader in the development of breakthrough adaptive remodeling techno
The TIDES-ACS results show us that the Optimax stent is noninferior in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to Synergy.

The presentation of the ESC late-breaker TIDES-ACS results show us that the Optimax stent is noninferior in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to Synergy.

News | Stents | November 24, 2017
November 24, 2017 – During a late-breaking session at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2017 meeting, presente
News | Stents | November 10, 2017
Cordis, a Cardinal Health company, recently unveiled a comprehensive interventional cardiology portfolio, which now...
OCT comparison between the Combo vs. Xience stents in the HARMONEE study.

OCT comparison between the Combo vs. Xience stents in the HARMONEE study.

Feature | Stents | November 08, 2017
November 8, 2017 – New results from the HARMONEE Japan/U.S.
FDA Approves COBRA REDUCE Trial of 14-Day DAPT With CeloNova Stent
News | Stents | October 27, 2017
CeloNova BioSciences Inc. announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved expansion of CeloNova's...
CeloNova Cobra Pzf stent
Technology | Stents | March 02, 2017
March 2, 2017 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared CeloNova BioSciences Inc.
OCT, intravascular imaging, stent, good stent apposition on vessel wall, TRANSFORM-OCT study

An OCT image showing good stent strut apposition against the vessel wall.

News | Stents | January 13, 2017
January 13, 2017 — Results from TRANSFORM-OCT, a prospective, randomized trial using optical coherence tomography (OC
EXCEL Trial, TCT 2016, drug-eluting stents, CABG, surgery left main heart disease, LMCAD

Gregg W. Stone, M.D., presenting the EXCEL data at TCT 2016 during a standing room only late-breaking trial session.

Feature | Stents | January 12, 2017 | Dave Fornell
The biggest news from the 2016 Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) meeting this past fall was the results
Biotronik's Osiro stent, prison IV trial

Biotronik's Osiro ultra-thin strut, sirolimus-eluting stent.

News | Stents | November 09, 2016
November 9, 2016 – Results from a randomized, multicenter trial failed to show non-inferiority of hybrid, ultra-thin
OCT stent strut coverage

OCT imaging showing neointimal tissue coverage of metallic stent struts.

News | Stents | November 07, 2016
November 7, 2016 – Results from TRANSFORM-OCT, a prospective, randomized trial using optical coherence tomography (OC
Overlay Init