News | August 12, 2009

FDA Medical Device, Radiological Health Regulator Resigns

Daniel Schultz, M.D., director of the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health

August 12, 2009 - The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) top medical-device regulator, Daniel Schultz, M.D., director of the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health, announced his resignation.

While Dr. Schultz said it was a mutual agreement with FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, the decision followed internal dissent over device-approval decisions that the regulator's critics said were too friendly to industry.

Dr. Schultz has worked at the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health for 15 years and led it for the past five years. However, concerns over Dr. Schultz’s decisions surfaced two years ago when Sen. Chuck Grassley (R- Iowa) held hearings on Dr. Schultz's approval of a nerve stimulation device to treat depression, irrespective of objections from multiple FDA doctors. The senator again opened an investigation into a knee-surgery device made by ReGen Biologics Inc., also approved by Dr. Schultz despite numerous objections from FDA scientists and reviewers.

A year ago, the House Energy and Commerce Committee launched an investigation into allegations by at least eight FDA scientists that agency managers coerced those in the medical device division into approving products despite serious safety and effectiveness concerns.

The investigation was prompted by a letter released publicly from “a large group of scientists and physicians” within the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), dated Oct. 14, 2008, said Committee Chair John Dingell (D-Mich.) and Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chair Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) According to the statement, the letter describes CDRH managers that have “corrupted and interfered with the scientific review of medical devices.”

The statement went on to say that the committee has been “provided with compelling evidence to support the charges that senior managers within CDRH ‘ordered, intimidated and coerced FDA experts to modify their scientific reviews, conclusions and recommendations in violation of the law.'”

The scientists claim that they were threatened with removal or negative performance reviews if they did not modify their scientific data to obscure unscientific clinical and technical data submitted by device companies and legal violations, including a lack of informed consent from study participants.

For more information: www.fda.gov

Related Content

ASNC and SNMMI Release Joint Document on Diagnosis, Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
News | Cardiac Imaging| August 18, 2017
August 18, 2017 — The American Society of...
Houston Methodist Hospital Enters Multi-Year Technology and Research Agreement With Siemens Healthineers
News | Cardiac Imaging| August 17, 2017
Houston Methodist Hospital and Siemens Healthineers have entered into a multi-year agreement to bring cutting-edge...
CDN to Integrate Advanced Cardiac Imaging Tools From DiA Imaging Analysis
Technology | August 10, 2017
August 10, 2017 — CDN recently announced a new partnership agreement with DiA Imaging Analysis Ltd., makers of next-g
Four Blue Cross Blue Shield Companies Issue Positive Medical Policies on HeartFlow FFRct Analysis
News | FFR Catheters| August 09, 2017
HeartFlow Inc. announced that four Blue Cross Blue Shield companies have each issued a positive medical policy for the...
Left Atrial Pressure Monitor from Vectorious Medical Technologies Offers New Hope for Heart Failure Patients

On of the top stories in July was the introduction of a left atrial pressure monitor from Vectorious Medical Technologies to prevent heart failure patient hospitalizations or readmissions. Read the article"Left Atrial Pressure Monitor Offers New Hope for Heart Failure Patients."

Feature | August 01, 2017 | Dave Fornell
Aug.
Philips released a new version of its iFR system that displays FFR readings as an overlay on live angiographic, angiogram images.

Philips released a new version of its iFR system that displays hemodynamic pressure drop points in an overlay on live angiographic images, matching up the iFR readings with corresponding lesions. The system is supposed to speed diagnostic decision making and help guide percutaneous revascularization procedures. 

Feature | FFR Catheters| July 31, 2017 | Dave Fornell
The gold standard for assessing the hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions to determine if they should be revas
New PET-CT Scan Improves Detection in Rare Cardiac Condition
News | PET-CT| July 25, 2017
Using a new imaging technique that can diagnose cardiac sarcoidosis much more accurately than traditional tests,...
Sponsored Content | Videos | CT Angiography (CTA)| July 21, 2017
DAIC and ITN Editor Dave Fornell discusses some of the most innovative new computed tomography (CT) technology and tr
Cardiac CT scan showing plaque and calcification in the coronary arteries, from a Toshiba CT scanner
News | Business| July 19, 2017
July 19, 2017 — The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) created a reimbursement fee chart for cardia
Overlay Init