News | April 22, 2009

HRS Reiterates Positive Correlation Between EP Certification, Improved ICD Outcomes

April 22, 2009 – In response to the article “Association of Physician Certification and Outcomes Among Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator,” published in the April 22 issue of the JAMA, the Heart Rhythm Society reiterates its position on the positive correlation between electrophysiology certification and improved outcomes following ICD implantation.

The study used cases submitted to the ICD Registry, which was created by the Heart Rhythm Society and the American College of Cardiology Foundation to collect detailed information on ICD implantations to assess and improve the care of patients receiving ICDs for primary prevention therapy.

The authors compared patient outcomes based on the certification status of the implanting physician: electrophysiologist, non-electrophysiologist cardiologist, thoracic surgeon and other specialists. Overall implantations by a non-electrophysiologist were associated with a higher risk of procedural complications compared to ICDs implanted by an electrophysiologist. Patients of non-electrophysiologists were also less likely to receive a CRT-D device when indicated compared to patients of electrophysiologists.

“This important study confirms the Society’s position that trained and experienced electrophysiologists are best equipped to provide optimal care for patients who need life-saving ICD or CRT-D therapy,” said N.A. Mark Estes, president of the Heart Rhythm Society. “Specialized training enables physicians to not only implant devices with a lower risk of procedural complications, but also select the most appropriate device-based therapy for each patient.”

The analysis also examined the geographic distribution of ICD implants, and found that the majority of ICD implants performed by nonelectrophysiologists took place at or relatively near hospitals in which an electrophysiologist also implanted ICDs.

The Heart Rhythm Society strongly recommends that all physicians and credentialing bodies follow the training guidance found in the ACC/ACP/AHA/HRS Recommendations for Training in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine Core Cardiology Training (COCATS) 3: Task Force 6 Training in Specialized Electrophysiology, Cardiac Pacing, and Arrhythmia Management.

For more information:,

Related Content

Boston Scientific Launches Resonate Devices With HeartLogic Heart Failure Diagnostic
Technology | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)| September 27, 2017
September 27, 2017 — Boston Scientific recently launched the Resonate family of...
Abbott Secures FDA Approval for MRI Compatibility on Ellipse ICD
Technology | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)| September 22, 2017
Abbott announced U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional labeling for...
Predictive Models May Help Determine Which Patients Benefit From ICDs
News | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)| July 06, 2017
Two predictive models may help cardiologists decide which patients would most benefit from an implantable cardioverter...
Videos | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)| June 01, 2017
Lucas Boersma, M.D., Ph.D., FESC, St.
The Unify ICD is one of the SJM devices in an FDA warning letter
Feature | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)| April 14, 2017 | Dave Fornell
April 14, 2017 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent a warning letter to Abbott/St.
ICDs, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, University of Alabama at Birmingham study, Circulation
News | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)| January 18, 2017
A new study published in Circulation has found there is a 23 percent risk in reduction of all-cause mortality in non-...
ICDs, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, survival rate, elderly patients, JACC study
News | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)| January 17, 2017
Of patients over age 65 who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) after surviving sudden cardiac...
Overlay Init