News | Venous Therapies | October 31, 2019

IVUS Better Than Venography to Identify Venous Stent Landing Zones

Comparison between intravascular ultrasound and angiography in iliac vein stenting 

A comparison of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) vs. angiography found a significant mismatch and showed the benefits of IVUS in venous interventions.

A comparison of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) vs. angiography found a significant mismatch and showed the benefits of IVUS in venous interventions.


October 31, 2019 – In a large series of iliac vein stent cases, a blinded comparison found intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) superior to venography in determining the proper location of treatment zones. This is reported in the November 2019 edition of the Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders.[1] 

Researchers from The RANE Center, St. Dominic’s Memorial Hospital, Jackson, Miss., performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of 155 limbs treated for chronic iliac vein occlusion between 2013 and 2015.

“Adequate assessment of the location and degree of stenosis and delineation of venous anatomy for optimal landing zones are key elements in the success of interventions to treat chronic obstructions of the deep venous system,” noted lead author Myriam Montminy, M.D., MSc, FRCSC.

“While venography is more accessible and less expensive to perform than IVUS, an increasing number of studies demonstrate that IVUS is significantly more sensitive than venography in identifying stenotic lesions in the iliac-caval segments,” Montminy explained. “Our study aimed to take this one step further by comparing these modalities in identifying the key parameters required to guide stent placement.”

Key demographics of this series included:

   • Age, years, mean (SD) - 59 (13)
   • Male -30%
   • Left leg - 61%
   • Post-thrombotic - 72%
   • Non-thrombotic - 28%

In the study, led by senior investigator Seshadri Raju, M.D., FACS, all of the cases utilized both venography and IVUS.  Comparisons between the modalities were made in a blinded fashion.

With regards to evaluation of the main venous stenosis, venography (compared with IVUS):

   • Failed to identify the stenosis in 19% of cases
   • Underestimated the degree of stenosis
   • Failed to locate accurately the stenosis in 68% of cases
 
Further, in identifying the location of the iliac-caval confluence (the proximal landing zone), venography correlated with IVUS in 15% of cases, wherein IVUS revealed the confluence to be higher in 74% of cases (mean of one vertebral height higher).

Lastly, with regards to the distal landing zone, venography correlated with IVUS in 26% of cases, wherein IVUS located the optimal site lower in 64% of cases.

“This study highlights that venography compared to IVUS is likely to be deficient in all three areas of concern in venous stenting cases – location of the maximal stenosis as well as the optimal proximal and distal landing zones,” Montminy added.

Venography is still a desirable adjunct in iliac vein stenting as it provides a panoramic view of the pathologic process, including collaterals, she said. “Additionally, IVUS may miss or provide only a partial image of certain lesions situated at the hypogastric-iliac and iliac-caval confluences due to the absence of a centering mechanism.”

While it is currently unknown if the superiority of IVUS in identifying key parameters essential for iliac vein stenting translates into improved clinical outcomes, the results of this study further defines the complementary roles venography and IVUS play in this growing area of vascular intervention.

This research article is open source and free to the public until Dec. 31 at vsweb.org/JVSVL-IVUS.

Reference:

1. Myriam L. Montminy, James D. Thomasson, Guillermo J. Tanaka, et al. A comparison between intravascular ultrasound and venography in identifying key parameters essential for iliac vein stenting. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. November 2019,  Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 801–807. 
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.015. 


Related Content

News | Cardiovascular Surgery

April 21, 2023 — A Michigan Medicine study finds that Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients with a common ...

Home April 21, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Surgery

March 24, 2023 — The American College of Surgeons (ACS), with the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS), has launched a new ...

Home March 24, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Surgery

March 15, 2023 — Researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Marnix E. Heersink School of Medicine published ...

Home March 15, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Surgery

February 7, 2023 — A scientific session devoted to identifying and closing gaps in health care took place January 21 ...

Home February 07, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Surgery

January 31, 2023 — Serotonin can impact the mitral valve of the heart and potentially accelerate a cardiac condition ...

Home January 31, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Surgery

December 30, 2022 — Azmi Atiya, MD, an established and highly respected cardiothoracic surgeon in the San Fernando ...

Home December 30, 2022
Home
News | Cardiovascular Surgery

December 21, 2022 — The Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai is again expanding its geographic reach and surgical ...

Home December 21, 2022
Home
News | Cardiovascular Surgery

October 24, 2022 The Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai has selected leading vascular surgeon Donald Baril, MD, as ...

Home October 24, 2022
Home
News | Cardiovascular Surgery

October 17, 2022 — Allegheny Health Network’s (AHN) Cardiovascular Institute announced the expansion of its nationally ...

Home October 17, 2022
Home
News | Cardiovascular Surgery

September 7, 2022 — Nuwellis, Inc., a commercial-stage company focused on transforming the lives of people with fluid ...

Home September 07, 2022
Home
Subscribe Now