News | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices (CRT) | September 03, 2015

Most CRT-P Patients Would Not Benefit From Addition of Defibrillator

CeRtiTuDe study findings support reducing rates of CRT-D implantation, decreasing costs and device-related complications

CeRtiTuDe cohort study, cardiac resynchronization therapy, CRT-D, CRT-P, ESC 2015

September 3, 2015 — Most patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacemaker would not benefit from the addition of a defibrillator, according to results from the CeRtiTuDe cohort study presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress.

“The choice between CRT with (CRT-D) or without (CRT-P) a defibrillator remains a contentious issue,” said Prof. Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, cardiologist at Georges Pompidou Hospital, René Descartes University in Paris, France. “No randomized clinical trial has been conducted to guide this choice.”

Patients with congestive heart failure are at high risk of dying from sudden cardiac death. Over the last decade, CRT and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have markedly improved prognosis. Guidelines do not make firm recommendations on the choice of CRT-P versus CRT-D, stating that there is insufficient evidence from randomized controlled trials to show that CRT-D would additionally improve survival compared to CRT-P. This has left room for physician discretion and resulted in wide variation in worldwide implantation rates. For instance, the proportion of CRT implantations which are CRT-D reaches more than 90 percent in the United States whereas it is lesser across Europe.

“Whether such a high rate of CRT-D use over CRT-P is justified is an important question to answer in terms of significant costs and device-related complications,” said Le Heuzey. “ICD lead failures, inappropriate shocks and risk of infection are real problems with impacts on quality of life and possibly survival. But the ideal way to answer this question, a randomized controlled trial directly comparing CRT-P to CRT-D, would have to be large, expensive and is unlikely to ever be conducted.”

The CeRtiTuDe study evaluated the characteristics of CRT-P versus CRT-D patients in a real-world scenario and analyzed to what extent CRT-P patients would have benefited from the presence of a back-up defibrillator. It was a multicenter prospective follow-up cohort study that enrolled a total of 1,705 consecutive patients implanted with a CRT (CRT-P 535; CRT-D 1 170) between 2008 and 2010 in France. Adjudication for causes of death was conducted at two years follow-up.

Patients with CRT-P compared to CRT-D (Figure 1) were older (75.9 vs 65.6 years, p<0.0001), less often male (69.5 vs 80.8 percent, p<0.0001), more symptomatic (proportion of NYHA class III/IV, 88 vs 80 percent, p=0.002), with less coronary artery disease (40.7 vs 49.3 percent, p=0.003), wider QRS (161 ± 29 vs 155 ± 26 msec, p=0.002), more atrial fibrillation (38.7 vs 22.1 percent, p<0.0001) and more comorbidities (≥ 2 comorbidities 16.9 vs 12.9 percent, p=0.04).

At two-year follow-up 270 patients had died, giving an annual overall mortality rate of 77.9 per 1,000. The crude mortality rate among CRT-P patients was double compared to CRT-D (relative risk [RR]=1.96, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]=1.51-2.66). “By cause-of-death analysis, a large proportion of the excess mortality among CRT-P subjects was related to an increase of non-sudden death,” said Le Heuzey. “This could indicate that this excess mortality is due to heart failure and non-cardiovascular events.”

He concluded: “Our findings suggest that patients selected for CRT-P in routine clinical practice would not benefit from the addition of a defibrillator. This indicates that CRT-D rates could be reduced, with consequent decreases in costs and device-related complications.”

For more information: www.escardio.org


Related Content

News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

April 20, 2023 — Researchers led by Northwestern University and the University of Texas at Austin (UT) have developed ...

Home April 20, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

April 5, 2023 — Acarix, a leader in acoustic and AI-based cardiac diagnostics, announced the release of a new study ...

Home April 05, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

March 29, 2023 — Irregular sleep patterns may play a role in the pathophysiologic development of cardiovascular disease ...

Home March 29, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

March 27, 2023 — Tenax Therapeutics, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on identifying, developing and ...

Home March 27, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

March 24, 2023 — Vaxxinity, Inc., a Cape Canaveral, FL-based company pioneering the development of a new class of ...

Home March 24, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

March 22, 2023 — Ancora Heart, Inc., a privately-held Santa Clara, CA-based company developing a completely ...

Home March 22, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

March 21, 2023 — The first platform to combine real-world cardiology data from millions of people in multiple European ...

Home March 21, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

March 13, 2023 — BioCardia, Inc., developer of cellular and cell-derived therapeutics for the treatment of ...

Home March 13, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

March 8, 2023 — A unique community-based partnership, the African American Heart Study, will be conducted to measure the ...

Home March 08, 2023
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

March 6, 2023 — A multifaceted intervention to improve prescribing practices increased the likelihood that patients with ...

Home March 06, 2023
Home
Subscribe Now