News | February 01, 2010

Stent Makers Settle Three Patent Disputes for $1.7 Billion

February 1, 2010 – Three patent disputes between Boston Scientific Corp. and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) were settled today with Boston paying $1.7 billion.

The disputes date back to 2003 and cover Boston Scientific’s Jang patent and J&J’s Palmaz and Gray patents, all of which involve intellectual property in the cardiovascular arena.

The first dispute involved a claim by J&J that Boston Scientific’s Express, TAXUS Express and Liberté stents infringed its Palmaz and Gray patents.

The second involved a claim by Boston Scientific that J&J’s Cypher, BX Velocity and Genesis stents infringed its Jang patent.

In 2005, there were liability trials on these two matters, and both parties were found to have infringed the other’s patents. Those findings were upheld on appeal. Damage claims from these two rulings were scheduled to be decided by two jury trials slated for this month in U.S. District Court in Delaware. With the settlement deal, those trials will no longer take place.

The third dispute involved a claim by J&J that Boston Scientific’s TAXUS Liberté stent infringed its Gray patent. That matter was scheduled for trial in September, but will no longer take place.

“We have recently made a concerted effort to mitigate risk throughout the company, including litigation risk,” said Ray Elliott, president and chief executive officer of Boston Scientific. “In the past year, we have significantly reduced the volume of outstanding litigation, having now settled 17 lawsuits with J&J, as well as disputes with other competitors and the government. We believe today’s settlement – while substantial – is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders. It resolves major litigation without exposing Boston Scientific to the uncertainties of a jury trial and a potential damages award that was impossible to predict. While we still have a number of litigation matters remaining, this recent settlement has materially reduced our financial risks going forward. We will continue to manage carefully our outstanding litigation, as part of our ongoing and comprehensive effort to reduce risk. With the resolution of these matters, there are now no material judgments or jury verdicts pending against the company.”

In addition to the matters resolved in the settlement, the District Court last month found all four patents in a lawsuit brought against the company by J&J to be invalid. J&J alleged that Boston Scientific’s
PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System infringed on its Wright/Falotico patents. A trial on those patents, which was scheduled to begin Feb. 9, will not proceed.

Under the settlement, Boston Scientific will pay J&J $1 billion today and the balance on or before the first week of January 2011.

For more information: www.bostonscientific.com

Related Content

The TIDES-ACS results show us that the Optimax stent is noninferior in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to Synergy.

The presentation of the ESC late-breaker TIDES-ACS results show us that the Optimax stent is noninferior in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to Synergy.

News | Stents| November 24, 2017
November 24, 2017 – During a late-breaking session at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2017 meeting, presente
News | Stents| November 10, 2017
Cordis, a Cardinal Health company, recently unveiled a comprehensive interventional cardiology portfolio, which now...
OCT comparison between the Combo vs. Xience stents in the HARMONEE study.

OCT comparison between the Combo vs. Xience stents in the HARMONEE study.

Feature | Stents| November 08, 2017
November 8, 2017 – New results from the HARMONEE Japan/U.S.
FDA Approves COBRA REDUCE Trial of 14-Day DAPT With CeloNova Stent
News | Stents| October 27, 2017
CeloNova BioSciences Inc. announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved expansion of CeloNova's...
CeloNova Cobra Pzf stent
Technology | Stents| March 02, 2017
March 2, 2017 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared CeloNova BioSciences Inc.
OCT, intravascular imaging, stent, good stent apposition on vessel wall, TRANSFORM-OCT study

An OCT image showing good stent strut apposition against the vessel wall.

News | Stents| January 13, 2017
January 13, 2017 — Results from TRANSFORM-OCT, a prospective, randomized trial using optical coherence tomography (OC
EXCEL Trial, TCT 2016, drug-eluting stents, CABG, surgery left main heart disease, LMCAD

Gregg W. Stone, M.D., presenting the EXCEL data at TCT 2016 during a standing room only late-breaking trial session.

Feature | Stents| January 12, 2017 | Dave Fornell
The biggest news from the 2016 Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) meeting this past fall was the results
Biotronik's Osiro stent, prison IV trial

Biotronik's Osiro ultra-thin strut, sirolimus-eluting stent.

News | Stents| November 09, 2016
November 9, 2016 – Results from a randomized, multicenter trial failed to show non-inferiority of hybrid, ultra-thin
OCT stent strut coverage

OCT imaging showing neointimal tissue coverage of metallic stent struts.

News | Stents| November 07, 2016
November 7, 2016 – Results from TRANSFORM-OCT, a prospective, randomized trial using optical coherence tomography (OC
biosensors Biofreedom stent
News | Stents| November 07, 2016
November 7, 2016 – The two-year results from LEADERS FREE, the first randomized clinical trial dedicated to high blee
Overlay Init