News | Heart Valve Technology | November 01, 2017

TAVR Cost-Effective Compared With SAVR in Intermediate-Risk Aortic Stenosis Patients

Results from PARTNER 2A and SAPIEN 3 cost-effectiveness studies show higher cost of TAVR valve offset by reductions in length of stay and in-hospital complications

TAVR Cost-Effective Compared With SAVR in Intermediate-Risk Aortic Stenosis Patients

November 1, 2017 — Analysis of the PARTNER 2A trial and the SAPIEN-3 Intermediate Risk registry found transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to be highly cost-effective compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in intermediate surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis.

Findings were reported at the 29th annual Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific symposium, sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (CRF), Oct. 29-Nov. 2 in Denver.

Researchers led by David J. Cohen, M.D., Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Mo., used data from the PARTNER 2A randomized trial and the SAPIEN-3 Intermediate Risk registry to perform a formal, patient-level economic analysis comparing TAVR using either the Sapien XT valve (XT-TAVR) or the Sapien-3 valve (S3-TAVR) with SAVR. The comparison between XT-TAVR and SAVR was based upon randomized assignment within PARTNER 2A; the comparison between S3-TAVR and SAVR was not randomized. Procedural costs were assessed based on measured resource utilization and all other costs were assessed by linking trial data with Medicare claims for the index hospitalization and follow-up period or by piecewise regression models for the remaining patients.

PARTNER 2A

In the trial, XT-TAVR led to significant reductions in procedure duration compared with SAVR (102±46 vs. 236±83, P<0.001) and hospital length of stay (6.4±5.5 vs. 10.9±7.6, P<0.001). Although procedural costs were $22,083 higher with XT-TAVR than SAVR (reflecting the higher cost of the transcatheter valve), most of this higher cost was offset by reduced costs related to length of stay and in-hospital complications such that total costs for the index hospitalization were only ~$2,900 higher with TAVR ($61,433 vs. $58,545; P=0.014). Over the following 24 months, follow-up costs were substantially lower with XT-TAVR (by $9,303 per patient) such that total medical care costs were lower with TAVR than SAVR at two-year follow-up ($107,716 vs. $114,132, P=0.014). When the trial results were projected over a lifetime horizon, XT-TAVR was projected to result in both cost savings of $7,949 and greater quality adjusted life expectancy (by 0.15 years).

SAPIEN 3

When performance of S3-TAVR in the S3i registry was compared with SAVR within PARTNER 2A, the reductions in procedure duration (84±38 vs. 236±83, P<0.001) and length of stay (4.6±5.7 vs. 10.9±7.6, P<0.001) were even greater than in the randomized trial. As a result, despite the higher cost of the transcatheter valve, total costs for the index hospitalization were lower with S3-TAVR than SAVR ($54,256 vs. $58,410, P=0.014). Over the first year of follow-up, S3-TAVR resulted in additional cost savings of nearly $11,000/patient.  When these in-trial results (including improved survival at two years) were projected over a lifetime horizon, S3 TAVR was projected to yield lifetime cost savings of $9,692 per patient and a significant gain in quality adjusted life-years (0.27 years) — an economically dominant strategy.

“For patients with severe aortic stenosis and intermediate surgical risk similar to those enrolled in the PARTNER 2 trial, these results demonstrating substantial cost savings and improved quality-adjusted life expectancy, indicate that transcatheter aortic valve replacement should be considered the preferred strategy based on both clinical and economic considerations,” said Cohen, who is director of cardiovascular research at Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute.

The PARTNER 2A and SAPIEN 3 Cost-effectiveness Trial was funded by Edwards Lifesciences. Cohen reported receiving research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular, as well as consulting income from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic.

For more information: www.tctconference.com

Related Content

TCT Announces 2017 Late-breaking Clinical Trial Presentations

Sapien 3 Valve Demonstrates Significant Cost Savings Over Surgery In Intermediate-Risk Patients

TAVR Equal to Surgery in Intermediate-Risk Patients

Related Content

Michigan Hospital Improves Post-CABG Outcomes Using Proactive Amiodarone Protocol
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | October 23, 2019
Proactive administration of amiodarone to patients recovering from a common heart surgery shows promise in preventing...
Gore Block Grant Supports SVS Quality Programs
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | October 17, 2019
W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. will support a new Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) initiative to advance patient...
Heart and Lung Surgery Patients May Be at High Risk for Opioid Dependence

Image courtesy of the American Heart Association

News | Cardiovascular Surgery | August 22, 2019
The amount of opioids prescribed for patients after heart and lung surgery has a direct relationship with the risk for...
Keck School of Medicine Promotes Patient Diversity in Cardiac Surgery Clinical Trials
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | July 26, 2019
A highly competitive $4.5 million grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Heart, Lung and Blood...
Google Doodle Celebrates Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Pioneer René Favaloro
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | July 12, 2019 | Jeff Zagoudis, Associate Editor
Internet search engine giant Google unveiled a new Doodle on its homepage Friday, July 12, celebrating the life and...
Open Heart Surgery Outperforms Stents in Patients With Multivessel Disease
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | May 03, 2019
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery may be the best treatment option for most patients with more than one...
SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System Cleared for Pediatric and Small Donor Hearts
Technology | Cardiovascular Surgery | February 01, 2019
Paragonix Technologies Inc. recently received clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a design...
Transplanting Pig Hearts Into Humans One Step Closer. A pig heart, shown here, is very similar in size and anatomy to a human heart. For this reason, pigs are used extensively in pre-clinical animal testing for new implantable cardiovascular devices. If pig hearts could be used for human transplantation, it would greatly alleviate shortages of donor human hearts.

A pig heart, shown here, is very similar in size and anatomy to a human heart. For this reason, pigs are used extensively in pre-clinical animal testing for new implantable cardiovascular devices. If pig hearts could be used for human transplantation, it would greatly alleviate shortages of donor human hearts.

News | Cardiovascular Surgery | December 11, 2018
The scientific journal Nature recently published an article from Munich University Hospital which describes the long-...
Bilateral Artery Use Does Not Improve 10-Year CABG Outcomes
News | Cardiovascular Surgery | September 06, 2018
While it is firmly established that the use of one internal thoracic artery can improve life expectancy in coronary...
Overlay Init