Feature | July 09, 2014

Drawing the Line When Evaluating Cost vs. Benefit

A big fly in the ointment for widespread adoption of many new technologies is cost. In today’s cost-conscience environment of healthcare reform, there needs to be a clear, quantifiable return of investment (ROI). This is especially true for new medical technologies that are competing with a long-established standard of care, where the new technology must show either a cost-benefit over the older technology, or must show a big improvement in patient outcomes to justify the added expense. With a device that shows only an incremental increase in benefit, say a 1-2 percent or less improvement over existing technology, the question may become one of economics rather than device effectiveness.

This is not only a question for physicians, as it applies to vendors developing these products as well. One of the biggest examples of this is the case of drug-eluting stents. During the last decade, key stent vendors were in an arms race to build a better device and capture a large share of the then lucrative coronary stent market. This included extremely expensive, blockbuster clinical trials, massive R&D efforts, and lawsuits and countersuits to try to slow down the competition. However, this came to a halt with the SPIRIT IV trial results in 2010, which proved the Abbott Xience stent was the best in the market for patient outcomes and beat out the long-time market leader, the Boston Scientific Taxus stent.  

However, the victory only just edged out Taxus. Stent thrombosis improvements were measured in fractions of less than 1 percent, and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization improvements were less than a 2.6 percentage-point absolute reduction. The data proving that Abbott was the top performer by only a small margin came at a staggering cost of nearly a billion dollars and several years of data collection. Few vendors are willing to shell out that sort of cash today to conduct similar sized trials that will be powered with enough patients to show only small incremental improvements.  

In reality, all the drug-eluting stents on the U.S. market today are good devices and all have similar patient outcomes. This has led to stents becoming commodity items, where lower pricing can often trump slightly better trial data. This is why the Xience stent does not master the entire stent market and why competitors remain in the game. 

I shared some additional thoughts on things to consider when looking at new devices and software in the article The Basics for Evaluating New Technology in the July-August issue of DAIC.

Related Content

First Pennsylvania Patient Treated in LEADERS FREE II Trial of BioFreedom Drug-Coated Stent
News | Stents Drug Eluting| May 12, 2017
PinnacleHealth CardioVascular Institute enrolled the first patient in Pennsylvania in a trial assessing the safety and...
Resolute Onyx DES, drug eluting stent, medtronic, gains FDA approval
Technology | Stents Drug Eluting| May 01, 2017
May 1, 2017 — The U.S.
Sponsored Content | Videos | Stents Drug Eluting| May 01, 2017
This video, provided by Medtronic, demonstrates the Resolute Onyx coronary stent.
Tryton Medical, Side Branch Stent, first U.S. commercial case, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center
News | Stents Bifurcation| March 31, 2017
Tryton Medical Inc. recently announced that the first U.S. commercial case using the Tryton Side Branch Stent was...
Sponsored Content | Videos | Stents Bioresorbable| March 30, 2017
Stephen Ellis, M.D., professor of medicine and director of interventional cardiology at Cleveland Clinic, discusses t
Gore Tigris Vascular Stent, Health Canada approval, PAD, peripheral artery disease
News | Stents Peripheral| March 16, 2017
W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. recently announced the Health Canada approval of the Gore Tigris Vascular Stent, a...
Sponsored Content | Videos | Stents Bifurcation| March 06, 2017
This video, provided by Tryton, demonstrates the implantation of the Tryton Side Branch Stent.
tryton side branch stent, dedicated coronary side branch stent

The Tryton Side Branch Stent is deployed in the side branch artery using a standard single wire balloon-expandable stent delivery system. A conventional drug eluting stent is then placed in the main vessel.

Technology | Stents Bifurcation| March 06, 2017
March 6, 2017 – The U.S.
Biosensors, BioFreedom drug-coated stent, LEADERS FREE II IDE trial, first patient, U.S. pivotal study
News | Stents Drug Eluting| March 03, 2017
Biosensors International Group Ltd. announced in February enrollment of the first patient in LEADERS FREE II, its new...
Overlay Init