Feature | April 06, 2011

Promus Element Comparable to Leading Drug-Eluting Stent

April 6, 2011 – One-year results from the pivotal PLATINUM Workhorse trial were presented at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) Scientific Session in New Orleans. The trial compared the safety and effectiveness of Boston Scientific’s Promus Element everolimus-eluting platinum chromium (PtCr) coronary stent to the Promus everolimus-eluting coronary stent.

The trial demonstrated the clinical non-inferiority of the Promus Element in comparison to the Promus in treating de novo coronary artery lesions, while showing a procedural benefit of reduced rates of unplanned (bail-out or emergency) stenting.

Results were presented by Gregg W. Stone, M.D., professor of medicine and director of research and education at the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital and global principal investigator of the trial. Results were also published concurrently in the online version of the Journal of American College of Cardiology (JACC) and will be available in the April 19 print edition.

"The Promus Element platinum chromium stent met the primary non-inferiority endpoint of target lesion failure at one year compared to the Promus stent, while demonstrating excellent safety and effectiveness with low rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and revascularization," Stone said. "The remarkably low rates of stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularization at one year confirm the successful transfer of the favorable outcomes associated with everolimus to the novel platinum chromium stent design."

The primary endpoint of non-inferiority for the Promus Element stent compared to the Promus stent was met with a 12-month target lesion failure (TLF) rate in the per protocol population of 3.4 percent versus 2.9 percent, respectively (pNI=0.001). No statistically significant differences in TLF components were observed between the two stents. In the intention-to-treat population, TLF (3.5 percent vs. 3.2 percent, p=0.72), cardiac death related to the target vessel (0.8 percent vs. 0.4 percent, p=0.51), myocardial infarction (MI) related to the target vessel (0.8 percent vs. 1.6 percent, p=0.14) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR, 1.9 percent vs. 1.9 percent, p=0.96) were all similar. Low rates of target vessel revascularization (TVR, 2.7 percent vs. 2.9 percent, p=0.83) and stent thrombosis (ARC definite/probable, 0.4 percent vs. 0.4 percent, p=0.99) were also observed at 12 months for the Promus Element and Promus stents.

Both stents achieved high rates of technical success (99.4 percent for Promus Element vs. 98.8 percent for Promus, p=0.14) indicating successful delivery and deployment of the stent to the target vessel. The Promus Element achieved a significant reduction in unplanned (bail-out or emergency) stenting (5.9 vs. 9.8 percent, p=0.004), including a significantly lower rate of inadequate lesion coverage (1.4 vs. 3.4 percent, p=0.01). These clinical observations are consistent with the results of comparative bench and animal studies, which have demonstrated the enhanced visibility of the Promus Element relative to the Promus.

The Promus Element received CE mark approval and was launched in Europe and other international markets in 2009. It features a PtCr alloy and new stent design to offer greater strength, enhanced deliverability and good visibility. The thin-strut stent is designed for improved conformability, minimal recoil and uniform lesion coverage and drug distribution. The advanced low-profile delivery system facilitates precise delivery of the stent across challenging lesions.

The PLATINUM clinical program is evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Promus Element stent in five multi-center studies totaling more than 1,800 patients, including single-arm studies evaluating small vessels, long lesions, pharmacokinetics, and quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound data. PLATINUM Workhorse is a global, randomized, pivotal controlled trial designed to support U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Promus Element. The trial enrolled 1,530 patients with up to two de novo lesions at 132 sites worldwide, and completed enrollment in September 2009.

For more information: www.bostonscientific.com

Related Content

Edwards Lifesciences Centera self expanding transcatheter (TAVR) valve
News | Heart Valve Technology| May 24, 2017
May 24, 2017 — Late-breaking data presented at EuroPCR 2017 demonstrating excellent clinical outcomes for...
3-D Echo Image Analysis With Philips' HeartModel A.I. is Accurate and Reproducible
News | Cardiovascular Ultrasound| May 24, 2017
May 24, 2017 — Philips recently announced the results from a global study indicating that automated...
Heart Failure Mortality Inversely Related to Wealth of Country
News | Heart Failure| May 24, 2017
Death in patients with heart failure is inversely related to the wealth of the country they live in, according to late...
Shockwave Medical Announces CE Mark for Coronary Lithoplasty System and Activities at EuroPCR 2017
News | Cath Lab| May 23, 2017
Shockwave Medical announced last week CE Mark for the company’s Coronary Lithoplasty System for the treatment of...
New Paper Highlights Success of Advanced Treatments in Complex Aortic Aneurysm Repair
News | Endovascular Aortic Repair| May 23, 2017
Significant success has been achieved in treating complex proximal aneurysms using a combination of fenestrated and...
Risk of Heart Transplant Rejection Reduced by Desensitizing Patient Antibodies
News | Cardiovascular Surgery| May 23, 2017
The risk of heart transplant rejection can be reduced by desensitizing patient antibodies, according to research...
News | Heart Failure| May 22, 2017
Serelaxin failed to meet the primary endpoints of the phase 3 RELAX-AHF-2 trial, according to late-breaking results...
Consumers Warned About Accuracy of Heart Rate Apps in New Study
News | Mobile Devices| May 22, 2017
May 22, 2017 — Consumers are being warned about the accuracy of heart rate apps after a study found huge variability
Overlay Init