News | FFR Technologies | May 31, 2017

Head-to-Head Study Validates Consistent Performance of Microcatheter FFR

ACIST-FFR Study at EuroPCR 2017 finds strong correlative performance of microcatheter fractional flow reserve measurement compared to standard pressure wires

Head-to-Head Study Validates Consistent Performance of Microcatheter FFR

May 31, 2017 — Acist Medical Systems Inc. announced results from the ACIST-FFR Study demonstrating the consistent and correlative performance of the Navvus MicroCatheter compared to standard pressure wire systems. ACIST-FFR (Assessment of Catheter-based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve measurement) is the largest multi-center study to compare microcatheter FFR to pressure wire FFR, as well as the only study to include multiple pressure wire comparators. The study was presented for the first time at EuroPCR 2017, May 16-19 in Paris, France.

“As the use of FFR in clinical practice continues to grow, it becomes increasingly important to understand the benefits and limitations of each type of FFR technology in regards to delivering consistent measurements and making coronary intervention procedures as efficient as possible,” said ACIST-FFR co-principal investigator William F. Fearon, M.D., Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cardiovascular Institute at Stanford University.

This prospective, multi-center study evaluated 245 patients with stable coronary artery disease at 11 U.S. centers, assessing the differences in fractional flow reserve values obtained using the Navvus MicroCatheter, to those using standard pressure wire systems. Patients’ FFR measurement was obtained by a pressure wire alone and with the microcatheter FFR over the pressure wire. All waveforms and measures were reviewed by an independent FFR core laboratory based upon pre-specified criteria for quality measurements.

Of the patients enrolled in the study, 169 had complete data meeting FFR core laboratory criteria. In these patients, an angiographic core lab used quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) to determine a mean reference vessel diameter (RVD) of 2.8mm, a mean lesion length of 15.3mm and a mean diameter stenosis of 47 percent. Unique to this study, 30 percent of cases included a RVD <2.5 mm — prior microcatheter FFR clinical studies had only included vessels with RVD ≥2.5mm.

The FFR data showed that microcatheter FFR technology offered consistent and modestly lower FFR measurements when compared to a pressure wire, with an average difference of -0.022 (95 percent CI: -0.029, -0.015). In nearly all of the cases (97 percent), the differences in FFR measurements did not impact clinical decision-making.

“The difference found between FFR measurements with a pressure wire and microcatheter tended to be influenced by RVD and lesion length; however, from a practical perspective, the clinician can just look at the microcatheter FFR itself,” said ACIST-FFR co-principal investigator and presenter Matthew Price, M.D., director, cardiac catheterization laboratory at Scripps Clinic. “The lower the Navvus FFR, the greater the bias. Since the bias is less at FFR values within the gray zone and higher, on average the clinical impact of the difference will be minimal.”

While the mean pressure drift was not different between the pressure wire and the microcatheter (0.015 vs. 0.015, p=0.44), the rate of clinically significant pressure drift was numerically higher with the pressure wire (7.4 vs. 3.5 percent, p=0.10).

“This study confirms and expands upon previous findings in a much more robust manner,” said Price. “It is encouraging to see these data further validate the diagnostic capabilities and technical merit of microcatheter FFR technology.”

Unlike standard pressure wires, the Acist RXi Rapid Exchange FFR System and Navvus Rapid Exchange FFR MicroCatheter allow physicians to use their 0.014-inch guide wire of choice throughout the procedure, addressing challenges of pressure wires, including accessibility in challenging anatomies, maintaining wire position, pressure‐measurement drift and ease of obtaining post‐intervention FFR.

For more information: www.pcronline.com

Related Content

News | Cath Lab
April 25, 2022 – NewYork-Presbyterian Hudson Valley Hospital celebrated the launch of its interventional cardiology ...
Home April 25, 2022
Home
News | Cath Lab
April 18, 2022 – Royal Philips and Oulu University Hospital (Finland) have announced a strategic 10-year partnership ...
Home April 18, 2022
Home
News | Cath Lab
February 16, 2022 – Fremont Bank Foundation recently donated $750,000 to its community partner, St. Rose Hospital ...
Home February 16, 2022
Home
News | Cath Lab
February 14, 2022 — A collaborative effort between The Valley Heart and Vascular Institute’s cardiology team ...
Home February 14, 2022
Home
Sponsored Content | Videos | Cath Lab

Advancements in analytics and data visualizations are helping to streamline operations and improve productivity at cath ...

Home January 13, 2022
Home
News | Cath Lab

January 4, 2022 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized marketing of the first laser-based device ...

Home January 04, 2022
Home
News | Cath Lab

December 14, 2021 — RSIP Vision, a medical imaging company applying advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and computer ...

Home December 14, 2021
Home
Feature | Cath Lab

November 15, 2021 — RealView Imaging Ltd. recently received FDA 510(k) clearance for its Holoscope-i holographic system ...

Home November 15, 2021
Home
News | Cath Lab

November 10, 2021 — Shockwave Medical a pioneer in the development of Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) to treat severely ...

Home November 10, 2021
Home
News | Cath Lab

November 10, 2021 — Philips Healthcare announced North American availability of new innovations in its portfolio of ...

Home November 10, 2021
Home
Subscribe Now