News | Pacemakers | May 24, 2018

Permanent Pacing Effective for Older Patients With Syncope and Bifascicular Block

Study finds significant advantages with permanent pacing versus an implantable cardiac monitor for particular patient group

Permanent Pacing Effective for Older Patients With Syncope and Bifascicular Block

May 24, 2018 — Syncope with bifascicular block may be caused by intermittent complete heart block, but competing diagnoses may coexist. A new study tested whether a strategy of empiric permanent pacing (PM) reduces major adverse events more effectively than acting on the results of an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). Results of the study were presented at Heart Rhythm 2018, the 39th annual scientific sessions of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), May 9-12 in Boston.

In a multinational, randomized, pragmatic trial, 56 subjects under 50 years old with bifascicular block, preserved left ventricular function, and less than or equal to one syncope in the preceding year, received PM and 59 received an ICM. The primary outcome measure was a composite of Major Adverse Study-Related Events (MASRE), comprised of death, syncope, symptomatic bradycardia, asymptomatic actionable bradycardia and device complications.

The PM and ICM groups were similar in age, sex, lifetime syncopes, syncope in prior year, duration of symptoms, no prodrome and baseline systolic BP. Forty patients had left bundle branch block and 75 had right bundle branch block and a left hemiblock. Patients were followed for a median 30 months, and 21 exited the study — eight patients died, six withdrew consent after 2 years, four withdrew due to cancer and three due to dementia.

PM effectively prevented the primary outcome with end study MASRE-free survivals in PM (63 percent) and ICM (22 percent) group (p<0.001). The proportions of patients with syncope were similar in PM and ICM groups (27 vs 31 percent, p=0.50, Wilcoxon). Fully 35 out of 59 ICM patients (59 percent) crossed over to PM. There were five pacemaker complications requiring reintervention.

The researchers concluded that permanent pacing compared to ICM is a preferred strategy in elderly patients with few but recent syncopal spells and bifascicular block. This is driven by the high proportion of mildly symptomatic bradycardias detected on ICMs leading to pacemaker insertion.

For more information: www.hrssessions.org

Read more about HRS 2018 late-breaking studies


Additional Content

News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

Nov. 1, 2026 – Abbott has announced the 30-day results from the TECTONIC Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Intravascular ...

Home November 03, 2026
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

Oct. 27, 2026 — Atrium Therapeutics, developer of RNA therapeutics targeted to the heart, has announced that the first ...

Home October 30, 2026
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

Oct. 1, 2026 — W. L. Gore & Associates’ medical business (Gore) has announced the first patient enrollment in the IBE ...

Home October 01, 2026
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

Aug. 31, 2026 — Amgen has announced new findings showing Repatha (evolocumab) reduced the risk of death in high-risk ...

Home September 02, 2026
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

Aug. 20, 2026 — A new study found that nearly 8 out of 10 young adult participants, average age 23 years, had ...

Home August 21, 2026
Home
Subscribe Now