News | Stroke | April 04, 2022

Researchers Examine Impact of Robotic Assistance Level in the Upper Limb Rehabilitation of Stroke Survivors

Researchers randomly allocated selected patients into two groups, one receiving maximally guided robotic therapy and the other self-guided minimally assisted robotic exercises

A stroke patient performing upper limb robotic therapy

A stroke patient performing upper limb robotic therapy with tailor-made assistance from a robotic device with feedback displayed on the screen. Credit: Takashi Takebayashi , Osaka Prefecture University


April 4, 2022 – Researches at the Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Human Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University in Japan conducted exploratory research which was aimed to examine the impact of robotic assistance level in the upper limb rehabilitation of stroke survivors. Upper limb motor recovery is always a big challenge for rehabilitation professionals and also for the patient. In the past, there were so many theories proposed by many pioneers in stroke management, however many of them failed and currently functional rehabilitation is proved most effective in upper limb rehabilitation as it emphasizes meaningful task-specific training and practice-based learning.

Advances in technology like robotics have made the therapist work easier, by assisting patients in doing guided limb movements and practicing the same with more repetition. However, there is a contradicting opinion regarding the level of assistance that is ideal for a better prognosis. This is evident when Takashi Takebayashi and colleague mentions that “robotic therapy can produce better upper extremity recovery compared to conventional rehabilitation remains unclear”

To answer this controversy a retrospective sub-analysis of a previous study was conducted.  Takashi Takebayashi and colleagues selected an experimental study performed with 60 participants who were selected from 715 stroke patients of a wide age range using specific selection criteria, from six rehabilitation hospitals in Japan, during November 2008 to April 2010. The researchers randomly allocated the selected patients into two groups, one receiving maximally guided robotic therapy and the other self-guided minimally assisted robotic exercises. In addition to collecting a detailed history of individual patients, performance-based impairment; upper limb motor functions and temporal performance of upper limb were also measured using standard outcome measures before and after 6 weeks of intervention.

Past research has suggested that maximal assistance using robotics may hamper the voluntary efforts generated by the patients and hence the assistance level should be within a tailor-made limit. As this claim is also contradicted by a few researchers, Takashi Takebayashi and colleagues wanted to solve the puzzle. So, they categorized the patients into high robotic assistance and little robotic assistance, based on the amount of external support and guidance offered by the robot.

Both the groups underwent intervention for 6 weeks period and for avoiding bias a specialized person, who was blinded to the study, was used to conduct all the outcome parameters. The subjects were divided into many clusters among which the severity of stroke manifestation was the predominant one. The subjects were divided into mild to moderate groups and moderate to severe groups to understand whether there was a difference in the contribution of robotics among them.

The findings in their study demonstrated that the intervention group comprising stroke survivors with severe-to-moderate stroke severity (FMA < 30) showed significantly better improvement in UE function and performance than the control group with the same severity. Interestingly, the stroke survivors with moderate-to-mild stroke severity (FMA ≥ 30) in the control group showed significantly better improvement using the same outcome tools compared to the intervention group.

The researchers quoted from the study results that “to maximize the improvements of the affected UE function in sub-acute stroke survivors, the robotic assistance may need to be increased in patients with severe-to-moderate paralysis and decreased in patients with moderate-to-mild paralysis, to improve the performance of voluntary movements as much as possible”. Hence the research highlighted that selecting the level of intensity and assistance level offered by robotics is highly technical and professional, and hence using robotics needs more expertise and patient assessment. The researchers also bring to light the varied results produced by the end-effector and exoskeleton-type robotics, however, the researcher employed the end-effector type of robotics for his research and have produced this novel result.

The researchers draw support from previous studies that have stated that robotics can enhance the activation of the sensorimotor cortex during the intervention period and thereby improve motor performance significantly. The authors hypothesise that the changes that have happened among the participants might be because of the Hebbian plasticity. Having said this the researcher also advises future results to concentrate on proving the same using more objective tools like functional magnetic resonance imaging using larger samples.

To summarise the researchers have clearly stated that “An optimal amount of robotic assistance was found to be a key to maximize improvement in post-stroke UE paralysis”

The article “Impact of the robotic‑assistance level on upper extremity function in stroke patients receiving adjunct robotic rehabilitation: sub‑analysis of a randomized clinical trial” was published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-00986-9

For more information: https://www.osakafu-u.ac.jp/en/

Related stroke content:

A Virtual Way to Rehab From a Stroke

Delayed Clot Removal Still Improves Quality of Life Post-Stroke

Survivors of Childhood Cancer Have High-Risk of Recurrent Stroke


Related Content

News | Stroke

July 9, 2025 — InspireMD, Inc., developer of the CGuard Prime carotid stent system for the prevention of stroke ...

Home July 09, 2025
Home
News | Stroke

May 28, 2025 — Siemens Healthineers has introduced the first mobile stroke unit (MSU) featuring the Somatom On.site head ...

Home May 28, 2025
Home
News | Stroke

May 21, 2025 — RapidAI recently announced new study findings that show RapidAI’s clinically deep algorithms deliver ...

Home May 21, 2025
Home
News | Stroke

April 17, 2025 — Adults younger than 50 years of age had more than double the risk of having a stroke from migraine or ...

Home April 17, 2025
Home
News | Stroke

On April 9, 2025, the world’s first multisector advocacy movement dedicated to stroke — the Global Stroke Action ...

Home April 15, 2025
Home
News | Stroke

March 3, 2025 — Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, recently announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ...

Home March 04, 2025
Home
News | Stroke

Feb. 6, 2025 — New findings from the DiVERT Stroke clinical study showed women spent less time in the hospital, saw ...

Home February 07, 2025
Home
News | Stroke

Feb. 5, 2025 — Removing a clot blocking a medium- or small-sized artery in the brain mechanically is a safe treatment ...

Home February 07, 2025
Home
News | Stroke

Jan. 29, 2025 — Researchers at Ochsner Health, led by Hernan Bazan, MD, DFSVS, FACS, have developed a predictive model ...

Home January 30, 2025
Home
News | Stroke

Nov. 16, 2024 Anthos Therapeutics, Inc.recently presented new data at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific ...

Home November 18, 2024
Home
Subscribe Now