Feature | August 07, 2014

Cardiology Departments in U.S. Hospitals Still Working to Find Ideal Image and Information Systems

August 7, 2014 — A newly released study by IMV Medical Information Division shows cardiology departments in U.S. hospitals are moving beyond separate cardiovascular image management systems (cardiac picture archiving and communications systems [CPACS]) and information systems (CVIS), with an eye to the improved efficiency provided by integration with other capabilities such as radiology PACS, other departmental IT systems and the hospital’s EMR (electronic medical records) system.

The dual objectives of integrating cardiac PACS and CVIS information into one cohesive system while integrating with the hospital’s EMR system are reflected in the respondents’ ratings of their departmental priorities. Based on average ratings, the top two priorities rated are to “manage the integration of cardiovascular IT (CV-IT) systems with EMR” and “align CV-IT systems with workflow practices.”

“U.S. hospitals have made progress in integrating cardiology images with non-image data over the past four years,” said Lorna Young, senior director of market research at IMV. “Cardiologists need patient images to be integrated with related non-image patient information and structured reporting to improve diagnostic efficiency."

IMV’s study shows U.S hospitals are at various degrees of implementation along this path. More than three-quarters of the surveyed hospitals (77 percent) indicated they have both cardiac PACS and CVIS. An additional 17 percent have one system or the other, while only 6 percent of the hospitals have no formal implementation of either system. Of the sites that have both systems, nearly half indicated their cardiac PACS and CVIS are fully integrated, while the rest have not yet fully integrated these two systems.

While the evolution in the use of CV-IT systems has progressed, it is clear that the respondents do not feel their journey on the cardiology information continuum is complete. When asked where they felt their current implementation of cardiac PACS/CVIS is relative to their ideal, only 33 percent of the respondents reported they were more than three-quarters of the way to their ideal system. Continued investment in CV-IT systems is proceeding, with two-thirds of the sites planning to upgrade or implement a new or replacement cardiac PACS and/or CVIS over the next three years.

Despite their acknowledgement that the ideal architecture includes integration with the EMR or electronic health record (EHR) system, respondents feel their ideal CV-IT solution should not necessarily be integrated by their EMR/EHR vendor because of cardiology’s priority of aligning its CV-IT system with its workflow practices. In fact, a higher proportion of all the respondents are more likely to favor their current cardiac PACS or CVIS vendor, or even their radiology PACS vendor, to be the integrator for their ideal CV-IT solution than the EMR/EHR vendor. Having an enterprise-wide archive solution that is developed for cardiology, radiology and other hospital departments also is part of the vision.

IMV’s report identifies trends in the installed base market share of cardiac PACS, CVIS, radiology PACS and EMR/EHR vendors; respondent satisfaction with their cardiac PACS/CVIS; and vendors being considered for future implementations of their cardiovascular information technology over the next few years. Vendors covered in this report include Agfa, Allscripts, Carestream, Cerner, CPSI, DR Systems, Epic, GE, Fujifilm, Lumedx, McKesson, Meditech, Merge, Philips and Siemens.

In other report findings, cardiac catheterization and echocardiography images and structured reporting form the backbone of the ideal integrated cardiac PACS and CVIS, with either or both modalities specified by all the respondents. About half of the current CPACS users also mentioned that they currently have access to intravascular ultrasound, interventional radiology/angiography, and vascular ultrasound images from their cardiac PACS.

Of the survey respondents who have both radiology PACS and cardiac PACS, the top two components that are integrated/interfaced are the data archive infrastructure and a common patient-centric database.

The top three functional capabilities sought are critical results reporting, additional/enhanced structured reporting and mobile access (capability to view images on portable devices), which were preferred by half of the respondents.

IMV's new report, the "2014 Cardiology Information Continuum: Present Access and Future Integration Strategies for Cardiovascular Information Technology," is based on responses from 194 department administrators who are cardiac PACS decision-makers, including cardiovascular services administrators, IT and management information systems directors, cardiac PACS managers, and radiology administrators in U.S. hospitals that have at least one cardiac cath lab installed.

For more information: www.imvinfo.com

Related Content

Philips, IntelliSpace Enterprise Edition, enterprise imaging, HIMSS17, RSNA 2017
Technology | Enterprise Imaging| February 21, 2017
Philips recently announced the introduction of IntelliSpace Enterprise Edition at the 2017 Healthcare Information and...
Logicalis Healthcare Solutions, top five cybersecurity issues, CIOs, chief information officers, HIMSS17
News | Electronic Medical Records (EMR)| February 10, 2017
February 10, 2017 — With the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society’s annual meeting (HIMSS17) schedul
ecg management systems, GE Muse

The latest version of GE’s Muse ECG management system allows integration with other vendors’ ECG, stress testing and Holter monitoring systems.

Feature | ECG Management Systems| January 30, 2017 | Dave Fornell
The movement from paper electrocardiogram (ECG) review to electronic ECG management systems in the past decade has he
Lumedx, CVIS, Baylor Scott & White Health, BHVH, Texas
News | Cardiac PACS| January 17, 2017
Lumedx Corp. recently announced that it has implemented Phase 1 of a long-term, multiphase cardiovascular information...
Lumedx, CVIS, PACS, Marshall Medical Centers, live, Alabama
News | Cardiac PACS| January 09, 2017
Lumedx Corp. announced at the end of November that two Marshall Medical Centers hospitals have gone live with the first...
Hunterdon Medical Center, McKesson, CVIS, cardiovascular information systems, cardiac PACS

The cardiology department at Hunterdon Medical Center in Flemington, N.J., wanted to eliminate cumbersome paper files and centralize access to patient records using a new, full-featured cardiovascular information system (CVIS).

Sponsored Content | Case Study | Cardiac PACS| December 28, 2016
Hunterdon Medical Center, a tertiary care center in Flemington, N.J., was looking to update its current cardiovascula
Sponsored Content | Videos | Artificial Intelligence| December 19, 2016
Mark Michalski, M.D., director of the Center for Clinical Data Science at Massachusetts General Hospital, explains th
Sectra PACS, Cardiology Module, ProMedica, RSNA 2016
Technology | Cardiac PACS| December 05, 2016
Sectra announced that nonprofit healthcare system ProMedica is adding the Sectra Cardiology Module into its existing...
ScImage, DIN-PACS contract, Department of Defense medical centers, DoD, RSNA 2016
News | Cardiac PACS| November 21, 2016
ScImage Inc. announced it has secured orders for cardiovascular imaging systems (CVIS) at six Department of Defense (...
Philips, TCT 2016, image guidance technologies, iFR, HeartNavigator
News | Cath Lab| October 26, 2016
Philips recently announced its latest image guidance solutions to be featured at the 2016 Transcatheter Cardiovascular...
Overlay Init