Feature | July 17, 2009| Dave Fornell

Remote Monitoring of Implantable Devices is the Future

There has been a growing trend in electrophysiology toward remote, home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, pacemakers and implantable cardiac monitors. These systems were displayed prominently on the show floor and discussed in several sessions in May at Heart Rhythm 2009 in Boston.

“Every cardiac monitoring device should have remote monitoring capability,” said Niraj Varma, M.D., Ph.D., FRCP, Center for Electrical Therapies in the Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart and Vascular Institute at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, during presentations at HRS. “It delivers clinically relevant information.”

He argued remote monitoring helps improve work efficiency, reduces loads on clinics, improves adherence to scheduled follow-ups, and enables early detection of more severe cardiac problems.
ICDs were introduced in 1989, and today more than 2 million patients have them implanted, Dr. Varma said. However, as this number grows each year with new patients being implanted and those already with them living longer, the number of patient follow-ups to monitor these devices is staggering.
“It’s a burden on the patient… not only in terms of distance and time, but the need to take off work,” Dr, Varma said. He said getting time off work is sometimes a problem, or the distances involved are great, so appointments are often missed, along with any opportunity for early detection of potential problems.
In 2001 Biotronik was the first company with an FDA-approved remote monitoring system, Home Monitoring, said Dominic A. Theuns, Ph.D., MSC, FACC, department of clinical electrophysiology Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, during HRS. He said Medtronic followed in 2005 with CareLink, Boston Scientific in 2006 with Latitude, and St. Jude in 2007 with House Call.

In 2006 the Heart Rhythm Society made a call to manufacturers to create home monitoring systems so the devices could be used as an early detection system of looming cardiac problems. Many of the new cardiac rhythm devices released in the past couple years have met this criteria.

Since these remote monitoring systems have been implemented, Dr. Varma said the adherence to regular monitoring has improved greatly with patients using remote monitoring-capable implants. He said triggers can be set for events that automatically send an update on the patient’s condition to the physician’s office using the remote monitoring transmission system. These triggers can include settings that are out of range, delivered shocks, or other parameters set by the doctor.

Dr. Varma said remote monitoring is also ideal for watching patients with questionable hardware following recalls. He pointed to the recall of the Sprint Fidelis lead, where patients can be monitored remotely to watch for problems, instead of the more expensive option of having the patient go through another procedure to install new leads.

While remote monitoring eases the burden of follow-ups on patients and clinics and allows for improved patient care, it also enables clinics to charge for more frequent checkups. Dr. Varma points out the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare (CMS) allows for reimbursement of remote monitoring services, which can be billed once every 90 days.

Dr. Theuns agreed remote monitoring has benefits, but he also argued the technology is not at the level of sophistication some manufacturers would lead EP physicians to believe. He said it will likely be years before ideal remote monitoring systems are developed. He points out some CRT and ICD devices, and the majority of pacemakers, do not have remote monitoring capabilities. Patients still need to be next to their Web-enabled transmitter to make a connection to send a report, so if an event happens away from home, it is not automatically reported.

He also pointed to technologies that are said to enhance the early warning capability of implantable devices, but have limited predictive value. Medtronic’s OptiVol technology is touted as a solution on implantable devices to detect heart failure, which coupled with a remote monitoring system sounds like an ideal solution to keep an eye on patients with signs of heart failure. However, Dr. Theuns said its predictive value is actually not very that great. He said it only detects about a third of the heart failure cases, because it only detects one type of symptom.

Despite some drawbacks, progress continues. At HRS Dr. Varma also announced data from a study using Biotronik’s Home Monitoring system for early detection of all arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmia and ventricular fibrillation. He said it took less than three days to detect these problems, versus more than 30 days using conventional office follow-ups.

Related Content

Biotronik, ProMRI Configurator tool, MR-conditional cardiac devices, ProMRI SystemCheck
Technology | Implantable Cardiac Monitor (ICM)| February 14, 2017
Biotronik has developed an online tool that streamlines the workflow for physicians selecting the right magnetic...
Abbott, St. Jude Medical, FDA approval, MR-conditional labeling, Assurity pacemaker, Tendril pacing lead
Technology | February 02, 2017
Abbott announced U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional labeling for...
NCDR, ACC, JACC, American College of Cardiology, national trends, heart disease treatments, trends in cardiovascular care
News | Cath Lab| January 23, 2017
January 23, 2017 — Over 93 percent of heart attack patients are receiving stents within the guideline-recommended thr
Biotronik, BioMonitor 2 implantable cardiac monitor, BioInsight clinical study, first patients enrolled
News | Implantable Cardiac Monitor (ICM)| January 20, 2017
Biotronik has enrolled the first patients in the BioInsight clinical study evaluating the safety and feasibility of...
ICDs, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, University of Alabama at Birmingham study, Circulation
News | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD)| January 18, 2017
A new study published in Circulation has found there is a 23 percent risk in reduction of all-cause mortality in non-...
LindaCare, expansion, remote patient monitoring, CIEDs, cardiac implantable electronic devices, United States
News | Remote Monitoring| January 18, 2017
LindaCare announced that it will open a new customer support facility in Connecticut to support growing interest in...
ICDs, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, survival rate, elderly patients, JACC study
News | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD)| January 17, 2017
Of patients over age 65 who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) after surviving sudden cardiac...
smartphone apps, cardiovascular health, Stanford University study, patient self-reporting, population health
News | Population Health| January 04, 2017
In a study published online by JAMA Cardiology, researchers from Stanford University assessed the feasibility of...
cybersecurity of ICDs, cyber security of medical devices

The FDA has concerns about the cybersecurity of implantable medical devices with wireless connections for patient monitoring or adjustments to how the device functions. Changing the function of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) using wireless access to the device could present a major patient safety issue.

News | Information Technology| December 29, 2016 | Dave Fornell
As wearable and implantable patient monitoring or therapy devices become more sophisticated with advanced wireless co
Overlay Init