News | December 11, 2013

Federal Court Shuts Down Patent Infringement Claim Against AccessClosure

December 11, 2013 — AccessClosure Inc. announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a request by St. Jude Medical Inc. to rehear an appeal on a double patenting ruling concerning its U.S. Patent No. 7,008,439 (the “Janzen ’439 patent"), covering technologies to close holes in arteries.
 
The U.S. Court of Appeals’ decision, holding the Janzen ’439 patent invalid, supports the original jury verdict on Dec. 21, 2010 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. The U.S. Court of Appeals will send the case back to the Texarkana District Court Dec. 16, 2013, when it issues its mandate.
 
“This is an outstanding day for our company," said Gregory Casciaro, president and CEO, AccessClosure Inc. “The court’s ruling on Janzen ‘439 is an important vindication that ends years of legal distraction. The timely decision allows the AccessClosure team to finally put this dispute behind us and enter 2014 with a clear focus on developing and delivering innovative, patient-friendly closure solutions and continuing to invest in new technologies that improve both the doctor and patient experience.”
 
This week’s positive final ruling came after the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a separate ruling, requiring the company to pay $27.1 million in compensatory damages to St. Jude Medical for infringing the Fowler family of patents with products distributed prior to October 2010, when those patents expired. Once the case is returned to the Texarkana District Court, a final accounting and determination of additional damages, if any, will be determined as it relates to the Fowler patents. The significance of this week's ruling on Janzen '439 is that AccessClosure no longer faces any threat of an injunction from St. Jude Medical because the Janzen ’439 patent was held to be invalid.
 
"While we maintain that our products do not utilize St. Jude technology, we are prepared to comply with the award decision related to the Fowler patent family and put all legal proceedings behind us,” said Casciaro.
 
For more information: www.accessclosure.com

Related Content

Sponsored Content | Videos | Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)| July 25, 2017
This video case study, provided by Gore Medical, is titled "Tackling Complex Cases in Dialysis Access," by John Ross,
Merit Medical, FDA Class I recall, Prelude Short Sheath Introducer
News | Vascular Access| March 31, 2017
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it has initiated a Class I recall of the Merit Prelude Short...
Halo One Thin-Walled Guiding Sheath

The Halo One Thin-Walled Guiding Sheath.

News | Vascular Access| January 31, 2017
January 31, 2017 — Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc.
Technology | Vascular Access| January 10, 2017
January 10, 2017 — Teleflex Inc.
Vascular Solutions, Teleflex
Feature | December 07, 2016
December 7, 2016 — Teleflex Inc. and Vascular Solutions Inc.
Teleflex, AVA 2016 Congress, Association for Vascular Access
News | Vascular Access| September 20, 2016
September 20, 2016 — Teleflex Inc.
Gore, DrySeal Flex Introducer Sheath, endovascular repair, EVAR
Technology | Vascular Access| August 30, 2016
W. L. Gore & Associates Inc. (Gore) announced the commercial availability of the Gore DrySeal Flex Introducer...
Access Scientific, PowerWand XL midline catheter
Technology | Vascular Access| August 10, 2016
August 10, 2016 — Access Scientific introduced the PowerWand XL, a companion to the PowerWand All-in-One, in July.
heart attack patients, rescue PCI, transradial and transfemoral approach, Perelman School of Medicine
News | Vascular Access| January 04, 2016
January 4, 2016 — In a comparison of bleeding complications and mortality between transradial and transfemoral...
transradial access, TRI, DRAGON trial, TCT 2015, non-inferiority, transfemoral access, TFO
Feature | Radial Access| October 18, 2015
Results from a prospective randomized trial of transradial (TRI) versus transfemoral (TFO) access in patients...
Overlay Init