News | Defibrillator Monitors | June 27, 2018

Wearable Defibrillators Effective for Children With Ventricular Heart Rhythm Disorders

Study finds wearable devices may provide reliable alternative to surgically implanted defibrillators in patients who cannot have surgically placed devices or who do not need them long term

Wearable Defibrillators Effective for Children With Ventricular Heart Rhythm Disorders

June 27, 2018 — Wearable cardioverter defibrillators may be a safe and effective alternative to surgically implanted devices in children with ventricular heart rhythm disorders that put them at risk for sudden cardiac death, according to new research. The vest-like devices that deliver electric shocks to interrupt a dangerous heart rhythm are discussed in a new study published in Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, an American Heart Association journal.

“Our results, which stem from the largest study to date among children in the United States using wearable cardioverter defibrillators, suggest that these external devices can help save the lives of children who are at the time, not good candidates for surgically implanted defibrillators because of their medical condition,” said the study’s principal investigator David Spar, M.D., assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Cincinnati and a pediatric electrophysiologist at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.

Sudden cardiac arrests in children are usually caused by heart abnormalities that the child is born with. Cardiac arrests are often triggered by an electrical malfunction that results in a rapid heartbeat that causes the heart to pump ineffectively. With its pumping action disrupted, the heart cannot pump blood to the brain, lungs and other organs, and death can occur if the heart’s rhythm is not restored or corrected.

Surgically implanted cardioverter defibrillators — the main therapy for children at high-risk for sudden cardiac death due to heart rhythm disorders, known as arrythmias — are effective in averting deaths from potentially lethal heart rhythms, but invasive surgery or prolonged hospitalization is required.

However, many young patients are not good candidates for these surgically implanted devices because they need only a temporary “bridge” to help their heart. For example, if they are waiting for a heart transplant, are a newly diagnosed heart failure patient who is recovering cardiac function or if they have an infected implanted cardioverter defibrillator, they would not be good candidates, Spar explained.

Even though wearable cardioverter defibrillators were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in pediatric patients in 2015, data about their safety and efficacy in children has remained limited. This gap in knowledge has been particularly troublesome in how effective the device would be in younger patients in treating dangerous arrhythmias. If effective, the wearable cardioverter defibrillator could avoid prolonged hospitalizations while still offering arrhythmia protection, researchers said.

The newly published results -- based on a review of clinical outcomes among all U.S. pediatric patients who wore wearable cardioverter defibrillators between 2009 and 2016 — is the first to describe appropriate therapy with a wearable cardioverter defibrillator in a pediatric population.

Of the 455 patients (average age 15) included in the analysis, eight (1.8 percent) received at least one shock treatment to interrupt a dangerous heart rhythm. Six of the eight patients in whom the device discharged received appropriate therapy for the type of heart rhythm the device is designed to detect and stop.

In the two cases of inappropriate therapy, the device misfired when it misread a signal from the patient’s heart. In all cases, the dangerous heart rhythm was successfully interrupted, normal heart rhythm restored and the patient survived.

Co-authors on the study were Nicole Bianco, Ph.D.; Timothy Knilans, M.D.; Richard, Czosek, M.D.;and Jeffrey Anderson, M.D. Disclosures are listed on the manuscript

This study did not receive outside funding.

For more information: www.circep.ahajournals.org

 

Reference

Spar D.S., Bianco N.R., Knilans T.K., et al. “The US Experience of the Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Pediatric Patients.” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, June 26, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.006163


Related Content

News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

May 18, 2024 — Boston Scientific Corporation today announced positive six-month results from the ongoing pivotal MODULAR ...

Home May 18, 2024
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

May 17, 2024 — Royal Philips, a global leader in health technology, is presenting new retrospective study results ...

Home May 17, 2024
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

May 15, 2024 — A new study demonstrated parity between a minimally invasive procedure to replace the aortic valve in the ...

Home May 15, 2024
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

May 14, 2024 — One of the most common genetic heart diseases worldwide, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) causes the ...

Home May 14, 2024
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

May 14, 2024 — An ambitious, nationwide clinical trial led by UVA Health’s Karen Johnston, MD, has provided doctors with ...

Home May 14, 2024
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

May 13, 2024 — Semaglutide reduces the need for loop diuretic use and dose, and has positive effects on symptoms ...

Home May 13, 2024
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

May 13, 2024 — Even though mortality and hospitalization rates have improved, the quality of life for those living with ...

Home May 13, 2024
Home
News | Cardiovascular Clinical Studies

May 10, 2024 — Scientists from Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University proved that Raman spectroscopy, a method by which ...

Home May 10, 2024
Home
Subscribe Now