News | Atherectomy Devices | November 07, 2019

No Difference Between Drug-coated Balloons and Plain Balloons After Laser Atherectomy

The late-breaking DCB Versus POBA After B-Laser Atherectomy Trial results presented at VIVA 2019

The AngioDynamics/Eximo Medical B-Laser represents a new atherectomy device. #VIVA2019 #VIVA #VIVA19

The AngioDynamics/Eximo Medical B-Laser atherectomy system.


November 7, 2019 — There was no difference between drug-coated balloons (DCB) vs. plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) following B-Laser atherectomy, according to late-breaking study results from the DCB Versus POBA After B-Laser Atherectomy Trial at the Vascular InterVentional Advances (VIVA) Annual Meeting. The results were presented by  John H. Rundback, M.D., director of the Interventional Institute at Holy Name Medical Center, Teaneck, N.J.

The AngioDynamics/Eximo Medical B-Laser represents a new atherectomy device utilizing a 355 nm laser with a very short pulse width to selectively ablate mixed-morphology plaque including calcification. Outcomes were compared for patients treated in the European Union CE mark and United States investigational device exemption studies with B-Laser, followed by either POBA (n = 46) or DCB angioplasty (n = 51).

Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. POBA patients had more popliteal and tibial lesions treated (77.8 and 84.2% vs. 11.1 and 15.8% in the DCB group), but other lesion characteristics were similar. There were no major procedural complications, including no embolization and no grade C–E dissections. Core lab–adjudicated duplex patency at six months was 89.5% in the POBA group and 85.2% in the DCB group. One-year clinical improvement (ankle-brachial index, Rutherford score) were the same.

These preliminary data indicate no differences in measurable short-term outcomes following B-Laser atherectomy regardless of subsequent mode of angioplasty. The characteristics of plaque modification following B-Laser atherectomy may impact outcomes and mitigate previously noted patency and clinical benefits of DCB angioplasty.

Find information on all the VIVA 2019 Late-breaking Clinical Trials


Related Content

News | Atherectomy Devices

July 28, 2022 — Northeast Scientific Inc., pioneers in reprocessing single use peripheral vascular catheters, announced ...

Home July 28, 2022
Home
News | Atherectomy Devices

March 9, 2022 — Medtronic is recalling (correcting) the TurboHawk Plus Directional Atherectomy System due to design ...

Home March 09, 2022
Home
News | Atherectomy Devices

January, 24, 2022 — Medtronic Inc. is recalling its HawkOne Directional Atherectomy System product due to the risk of ...

Home January 24, 2022
Home
News | Atherectomy Devices

January 10, 2022 — Cardiovascular Systems Inc. (CSI) is recalling the Wirion atherectomy embolic protection device ...

Home January 10, 2022
Home
News | Atherectomy Devices

July 20, 2020 – BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company) recently completed the acquisition of Straub Medical AG, a privately ...

Home July 20, 2020
Home
News | Atherectomy Devices

February 13, 2020 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued its final guidance on "Peripheral Vascular ...

Home February 13, 2020
Home
News | Atherectomy Devices

November 7, 2019 — The REVEAL FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) trial confirmed a favorable safety and ...

Home November 11, 2019
Home
Technology | Atherectomy Devices

September 13, 2019 — Rex Medical L.P. has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for ...

Home September 13, 2019
Home
News | Atherectomy Devices

July 18, 2018 — Avinger Inc. announced in June that several physicians have successfully treated over 40 patients for ...

Home July 18, 2018
Home
Technology | Atherectomy Devices

May 24, 2018 — Avinger Inc. announced that the company received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food & Drug ...

Home May 24, 2018
Home
Subscribe Now