Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor

Dave Fornell, Editor DAIC

Blog | Dave Fornell, DAIC Editor | Cardiovascular Business| July 09, 2014

Drawing the Line When Evaluating Cost vs. Benefit

A big fly in the ointment for widespread adoption of many new technologies is cost. In today’s cost-conscience environment of healthcare reform, there needs to be a clear, quantifiable return of investment (ROI). This is especially true for new medical technologies that are competing with a long-established standard of care, where the new technology must show either a cost-benefit over the older technology, or must show a big improvement in patient outcomes to justify the added expense. With a device that shows only an incremental increase in benefit, say a 1-2 percent or less improvement over existing technology, the question may become one of economics rather than device effectiveness.

This is not only a question for physicians, as it applies to vendors developing these products as well. One of the biggest examples of this is the case of drug-eluting stents. During the last decade, key stent vendors were in an arms race to build a better device and capture a large share of the then lucrative coronary stent market. This included extremely expensive, blockbuster clinical trials, massive R&D efforts, and lawsuits and countersuits to try to slow down the competition. However, this came to a halt with the SPIRIT IV trial results in 2010, which proved the Abbott Xience stent was the best in the market for patient outcomes and beat out the long-time market leader, the Boston Scientific Taxus stent.  

However, the victory only just edged out Taxus. Stent thrombosis improvements were measured in fractions of less than 1 percent, and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization improvements were less than a 2.6 percentage-point absolute reduction. The data proving that Abbott was the top performer by only a small margin came at a staggering cost of nearly a billion dollars and several years of data collection. Few vendors are willing to shell out that sort of cash today to conduct similar sized trials that will be powered with enough patients to show only small incremental improvements.  

In reality, all the drug-eluting stents on the U.S. market today are good devices and all have similar patient outcomes. This has led to stents becoming commodity items, where lower pricing can often trump slightly better trial data. This is why the Xience stent does not master the entire stent market and why competitors remain in the game. 

I shared some additional thoughts on things to consider when looking at new devices and software in the article The Basics for Evaluating New Technology in the July-August issue of DAIC.

 

Related Content on the Basics of Evaluating New Technology

Four Key Themes Emerging in the Medical Technology Market

Don’t Overlook the Simple Questions When Purchasing New Technology

Drawing the Line When Evaluating Cost vs. Benefit

Related Content

FDA Releases New Report Assessing Quality, Safety and Effectiveness of Medical Device Servicing
News | Cardiovascular Business | June 07, 2018
A new report from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discusses the continued quality, safety and effectiveness...
DAIC Editor Dave Fornell won the 2018 AZBEE national silver award for best blog for "The Future of Cardiology: 17 Technologies to Watch. DAIC magazine - diagnostic and interventional cardiology magazine.
News | Cardiovascular Business | May 14, 2018
May 14, 2018 — Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology (DAIC) magazine was honored with a ...
FDA Announces New Medical Device Safety Action Plan
News | Cardiovascular Business | April 25, 2018
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a new Medical Device Safety Action Plan outlining how the agency...
DAIC Wins Two 2018 Regional Azbee Awards for Editorial Excellence
Feature | Cardiovascular Business | April 20, 2018
Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology was honored with a pair of Azbee Awards for editorial excellence at the 2018...
DAIC Editor Dave Fornell displays the 2018 Neal Award for Best Use of Social Media
News | Cardiovascular Business | April 05, 2018
April 5, 2018 — Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology (DAIC) magazine received the 2018 Jesse H.
Veritas Capital Acquiring Three Software Units from GE Healthcare
News | Cardiovascular Business | April 02, 2018
GE Healthcare announced the sale of its Value-Based Care Division — including its software assets for Enterprise...
The annual Azbee Awards are hosted by the American Society of Business Publication Editors (ASBPE) to recognize editorial and design excellence in the business, trade and specialty press. Dave Fornell won blog award for DAIC
News | Cardiovascular Business | March 08, 2018
Scranton Gillette Communications’ Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology (DAIC) was recently named a 2018
Fysicon announced its acquisition by Canon Medical Systems Corporation.
News | Cardiovascular Business | March 08, 2018
Fysicon announced its acquisition by Canon Medical Systems Corporation. Linda Elberse, CEO of Fysicon, stated: "Being...
ACC 2018 Cardiovascular Summit Teaches Cardiology Best Practices
News | Cardiovascular Business | February 28, 2018
The American College of Cardiology’s Cardiovascular Summit will begin on Thursday, Feb. 22, 2018, bringing together...
FDA Releases Final Rule on Data Acceptance from Medical Device Clinical Investigations
News | Cardiovascular Business | February 21, 2018
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued the final rule on “Human Subject Protection; Acceptance of Data from...
Overlay Init