Feature | Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) | February 02, 2021 | By Dave Fornell, Editor

Boston Scientific Recalls Emblem S-ICD After 26 Serious Injuries and One Death

The subcutaneous electrode can fracture and will make the ICD inoperable

Figure 1: Picture of the Emblem S-ICD Subcutaneous Electrode with an arrow showing where separation usually happens (distal to the proximal sense ring).

Figure 1: Picture of the Emblem S-ICD Subcutaneous Electrode with an arrow showing where separation usually happens (distal to the proximal sense ring).


February 2, 2020 — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has identified a recent recall of the Boston Scientific Emblem S-ICD subcutaneous electrode as a Class I recall.

Boston Scientific is recalling the subcutaneous-ICD systems electrode because of increased risk of fractures in the area distal to the proximal sense ring, shown in Figure 1. If the device fractures during use, it could become unable to deliver therapy to slow very fast heartbeats from cardiac arrest (tachycardia). The FDA said a failed device may cause serious adverse events, include injury or death if cardiac arrest cannot be treated. The FDA said there is also risk for additional surgery to replace failed device leads.

The FDA said there have been 27 complaints about this device issue, and 26 reports of serious injuries. One death was also reported.

Read the FDA's Feb. 2, 2021 recall notice

The Model 3501 electrode is part of the Boston Scientific S-ICD System. The device is an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). It is innovative because it is the first ICD system that does not use leads that run through large veins from the surgically implanted device into the heart. Instead, a lead is implanted just under the skin along the sternum in a minimally invasive procedure. 

The recall includes all 19,919 devices manufactured from March 2016 and November 2020, and distributed between June 2017 to November 2020.

Boston Scientific recommends replacing any electrode that is shown to have breaks with signs like artifacts, high impedance alert, or based on X-ray imaging. The company said routine replacement of an electrode without evidence of breaking is not recommended. 

The company said it wants all explanted devices returned to Boston Scientific for evaluation. 

Recommendations for Patients With Recalled Emblem S-ICD Systems

On Dec. 2, 2020, Boston Scientific sent an important medical device advisory letter to all affected customers with recommendations for prompt identification of devices at risk for electrode body fracture. 

Read the Boston Scientific recall letter.

Recommendations were offered to help physicians and patients evaluate the risks of using affected devices compared to replacing them. Care for recalled devices at risk for failure were provided:

   • Enroll and monitor patients through Latitude remote monitoring to detect any alerts or artifacts on the devices in between office device checks.
   
   • Ask patients to do weekly remote checks.

   • Perform a system follow-up every three months by remote or in-office checks.

   • Assess sensing performance in-clinic if any of the following is observed:
       - Non-physiologic, mechanical artifacts
       - If artifacts are found, this may be a sign of an electrode body fracture.
       - High electrode impedance alerts.

   • Capture all sensing vectors that may indicate onset of electrode body fracture such as:
      - Cardiac signals on the S-ECGs of the primary and secondary sensing vector that look nearly identical
      - Flatline S-ECGs in the alternate sensing vector

   • Review stored devices for artifacts, as this may be a sign of potential electrode body fracture.

  • Perform a chest radiography of the entire electrode length if there is a suspicion of a break.
      - In the absence of any indications of electrode fracture, surveillance X-rays are not recommended.

   • Demonstrate the device beeper to the patient during the next office visit.
       – For patients not monitored by Latitude, repeat the beeper demonstration following any MRI scan, as strong magnetic fields may cause permanent loss of beeper volume
       – Remind all patients to quickly contact their physician if beeping tones are heard from their device or if a shock is delivered.

   • Evaluate the risk for life-threatening harm due to an electrode body fracture. This is greatest for patients who:
      – Have a history of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias such as secondary prevention
      – Are unable to be reliably followed remotely or in person every three months
      – Are not monitored via LATITUDE and are unable to hear beeping tones

   • Replace any electrode that is shown to have breaks with signs like artifacts, high impedance alert, or X-ray results.

Customers who have questions about the notification should contact their local sales representative or the Boston Scientific Technical Services team by phone at (800)-CARDIAC (227-3422) or by emailing [email protected]

 

Related S-ICD Content:

VIDEO: How to Install a Subcutaneous ICD System

VIDEO: Top New EP Technologies at Heart Rhythm Society 2020 — Interview with Andrew D. Krahn, M.D.

UNTOUCHED Trial Data Underscores Safety And Efficacy Of Boston Scientific S-ICD System

Head-to-head Comparison Shows Subcutaneous ICDs Safer Than Transvenous Defibrillators 

The Future of Cardiac Rhythm Management Device Technology

New Technology and Market Challenges Facing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Emblem Subcutaneous ICD Safe and Effective for Majority of Patients

VIDEO: Overview of Subcutaneous ICD Technology — Interview with Lucas Boersma, M.D.
 


Related Content

Feature | EP Lab | By Vijay Kundekar

Arrhythmias can be described as irregular heart rhythms that are brought on by numerous factors, including heart damage ...

Home August 23, 2022
Home
News | EP Lab

May 24, 2022 — Attune Medical, a pioneering medical device company with a technology platform based on temperature ...

Home May 24, 2022
Home
News | EP Lab

May 4, 2022 — CathVision, a medical technology company developing innovative electrophysiology solutions designed to ...

Home May 04, 2022
Home
News | EP Lab

April 27, 2022 – CathVision, a medical technology company developing innovative electrophysiology solutions designed to ...

Home April 27, 2022
Home
News | EP Lab

Royal Philips, a global leader in health technology, announced late-breaking results of a large-scale, real-world ...

Home April 12, 2022
Home
News | EP Lab

January 14, 2022 — Medtronic has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Affera Inc., a Boston area-based ...

Home January 14, 2022
Home
News | EP Lab

January 13, 2022 — Abbott received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for the EnSite X EP System with ...

Home January 13, 2022
Home
News | EP Lab

January 7, 2022 — Khaldoun Tarakji, M.D., M.P.H., associate section head of cardiac electrophysiology at the Heart ...

Home January 07, 2022
Home
News | EP Lab

January 5, 2022 — Stereotaxis announced a recent publication in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine titled “Atrial ...

Home January 05, 2022
Home
Feature | EP Lab

Children’s Hospital Los Angeles cardiologist Michael Silka, M.D., helped to pioneer the development of indications for ...

Home December 07, 2021
Home
Subscribe Now